Cofense Triage vs. Splunk Enterprise Security

The tool is very helpful in improving Phishing detection capabilities as it streamlines the process of analyzing user reports a lot. Besides it has a built-in mechanism of rating reporters(end-users) based on their historical performance. Downside - tool requires continuous resource investment to deliver best result. Tool is not helping too much in improving user-education, because automated response process is not immediate and is prone to errors

Incentivized

Well-Suited Scenarios:

Real-Time Threat Response: ES excels in swiftly detecting and responding to security threats through data correlation.

Compliance Management: ES streamlines compliance with detailed logs and reports, ideal for regulated industries.

User Behavior Analytics: Effective in monitoring user and entity behavior, particularly for insider threat detection.

Large-Scale Environments: Valuable for organizations with diverse data sources and high volumes of data.

Incident Investigation: ES aids in post-incident analysis, reconstructing events to understand root causes.

Less Appropriate Scenarios:

Smaller Organizations: For simpler setups, ES may be complex and costly.

Static Environments: In low-risk settings, ES's advanced features may be unnecessary.

Limited Resources: Tight budgets or sparse IT resources may hinder effective ES use.

Lack of In-House Expertise: Without security experts, optimizing ES can be challenging.

Budget Constraints: ES may be cost-prohibitive for budget-conscious organizations, prompting consideration of more affordable alternatives.

Incentivized

• Separating links and attachments contained in the email, and checking to see if they are known malicious.
• Clustering like emails to save time when responding.
• Providing risks scores with each cluster to give an estimate on which clusters should be addressed first.

Incentivized

• Its best feature is its user interface, which is easy to navigate and understand. All you need is a little tutorial on how to use the Splunk query language and you're done.
• Logs can be easily uploaded or shared across multiple platforms and display a highly insightful graphical representations of data using graphs, tables, and many other formats.

Incentivized

• YARA rules, while the functionality is fantastic I've found that the documentation can be a bit confusing. Although, that might just be my personal experience.
• Rare glitches make the send notification button unusable. This can be remediated by navigating to a different report, but [it] is a bit of a pain in the moment.
• I would like to see a dark mode get added as well, but that's obviously a tertiary concern.

Incentivized

• To identify User Behaviour analysis is lacking component which we get in Splunk UBA.
• The documentation part is hard to work on because if the new user tries to learn ES then the documentation is not user-friendly.
• ES must ass more Knowledge objects by default to make security-related aspects more reliable and enhance the details.

Incentivized

Cofense is stable and provides easy to use solution to aid the investigation of emails as well as managing simulated phishing campaigns.

Incentivized

We are very happy with Splunk and would advise anyone to take a serious look at it. It might look pricey but the rewards Splunk offers seem endless.

Incentivized

The interface is easy and intuitive.

Incentivized

You definitely need to learn how to use Splunk to get the most of the tool. There are many courses available for free to get up to speed on the usability of the tool but it's not that simple. It will take time to digest all the data and to understand how to query for what you are looking for.

Incentivized

We've experienced zero downtime.

Incentivized

I'm not an ES user, but, in my implementation I usually try to prevent all service stops to guarantee High availability to the final customers.

Incentivized

No slowness seen.

Incentivized

ES requires a very performant infrastructure: if it has it's performant, otherwise not. I had situation with a very performant infrastructure and I didn't notized that it was a distributed architecture, it seemed that there ware few data on my PC, othewise I experienced less performant infrastructures with less performaces.

Incentivized

It's good when it's responsive, but I've had times where I had to wait quite a while for a response. But these are typically the exceptions rather than the rule. When you do get a response it is always well-informed and appropriate. I would say they've been trending better over time with this.

Incentivized

Training was through, relevant and easy to follow.

Incentivized

I experienced only on-line training, but the trainers were very professional and competent. Maybe it could be more useful if they also have an experience in projects because sometimes they didn't have a real project experience to communicate to the students. Anyway, it was very interesting and I learned many thing that's very difficoult (or maybe impossible!) to have by myself, aven if I have more than 10 years of Splunk activity experience.

Incentivized

It was very interesting and I learned many thing that's very difficoult (or maybe impossible!) to have by myself. The only problem was that, when I worked with the Splunk Professional Services, I found some difference between the training contents and the information from PS. In addition is required a long experience on Splunk Enterprise for the data ingestion part, in other words I'm able to work with ES because I'm worling on Splunk since 11 years, otherwise I'd some problem.

Incentivized

It's a fantatic product and it was very useful the presence of Splunk Professional Services for the Design Phase and the final Health Check.

Incentivized

The other product had a lot of fails on the auto-processing and did not integrate well with our current environment. One issue had to do with the way it sends the submissions to its processing engine—our email gateway configuration would have blocked this traffic. I also did not like the user interface.

Incentivized

LogRhythm is good for a team comprising mostly non-technical IT users. Unlike Splunk, it has a GUI log search and a good ticketing system. Splunk is better than Logrhythm for me as it provides me with the ultimate flexibility to write custom queries. Scalyr is a good tool and quite frankly lot faster than Splunk. However, I prefer Splunk because of its better Dashboards and panel customization abilities. Elastic is another amazing tool. It is hard to choose between the two especially because both have different sets of logs on them. I use both. Elastic for internal server logs, Splunk for everything else.

Incentivized

We've experienced zero downtime

Incentivized

We have on prem splunk and it’s mostly east to setup, but we have issues keeping data separated between customer splunk deployments while at the same time only having to look at one SIEM to address events in every environment

Incentivized

• The biggest impact has been the time saved.
• My company had nothing of this sort previously and we were stuck trying to make use of free resources and doing things very manually. Triage was a huge life saver in this area.
• The ability to quickly respond to several users at once has been a great help.

Incentivized

• We have a 100% success rate on all our ES implementations due to the amazing documentation and Splunk enablement on the subject.
• Our Splunk ES business has grown 100% YoY for the last 3 years.
• In terms of long term management and maintenance, ES has been highly stable and predictable, reducing our overhead on costly services team for ad hoc maintenance work.