Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager vs. MagicPixel

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Commanders Act offers Enterprise Tag Manager, a product designed to handle website tags - and also SDKs in a single SDK container - through a management interface without the need for technical expertise.N/A
MagicPixel
Score 7.7 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
MagicPixel's server side tag management solution allows users to manage both web and mobile app tagging from the same console. MagicPixel helps marketers in healthcare and insurance sectors to comply with HIPAA guidelines by protecting sensitive PII of users. Users can enable consent-driven data…N/A
Pricing
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag ManagerMagicPixel
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag ManagerMagicPixel
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag ManagerMagicPixel
Considered Both Products
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager

No answer on this topic

MagicPixel
Chose MagicPixel
I only briefly had an experience with Hitask but the biggest tale away for me was that MagicPixel a better user interface and user experience. This was really important to me because the more user friendly the tool is, theoretically we are spending less time using the tool but …
Features
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag ManagerMagicPixel
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager
7.0
Ratings
13% below category average
MagicPixel
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Tag Management
Comparison of Tag Management features of Product A and Product B
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager
7.0
Ratings
12% below category average
MagicPixel
7.2
Ratings
9% below category average
Tag library9.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Tag variable mapping7.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Ease of writing custom tags8.00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Rules-driven tag execution8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Tag performance monitoring3.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Page load times00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Data Management & Integrity
Comparison of Data Management & Integrity features of Product A and Product B
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag Manager
6.0
Ratings
28% below category average
MagicPixel
-
Ratings
Event tracking4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Universal data layer8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated error checking6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag ManagerMagicPixel
Small Businesses
Google Tag Manager
Google Tag Manager
Score 8.8 out of 10
Google Tag Manager
Google Tag Manager
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Google Tag Manager
Google Tag Manager
Score 8.8 out of 10
Google Tag Manager
Google Tag Manager
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Score 8.2 out of 10
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag ManagerMagicPixel
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Commanders Act Enterprise Tag ManagerMagicPixel
Likelihood to Recommend
If you need a single place where you can handle all the third party pixels, this is a well-suited platform. As well as if you want to keep the deployment independent from all other (and more complex) deployments driven by IT. If you need a pixel to be fired not just when the page loads, but based on user actions, you should use the events and that's pretty complex to handle.
Read full review
Magic Pixel has worked really well between teams - the ability for anyone on our team from marketing to IT to channel leads can update and implement and track, enabling for better integration and more efficiency
Read full review
Pros
  • Creating new pixels is very easy, as well as organizing all of them, handling prioritization between different partners' pixels.
  • Defining the perimeters and constraints where the pixels need to be fired is a breeze.
  • Deploying the container and keeping track of all the modification is very well done.
  • The configuration of the deduplication rule is pretty flexible.
Read full review
  • Multi-integrated tracking approach
  • Tag analytics
  • Lighthouse integration for Sitespeed + page experience monitoring.
  • Live debugging
Read full review
Cons
  • Reports. Tag Commander lacks in term of reports of what's happening. There is an additional module called Attribution Management System that gives you a lot of insights, but more basic reports to understand what has been fired will be useful.
  • Support. Tag Commander support is very low responsive. It took several days to have the first feedback and generally, it takes a lot of emails to get what you need.
  • Deduplication engine flexibility. The engine is there and it works pretty well, until you have a slightly different need. In that case you need to implement something custom in terms of implementation, reports, etc. A more flexible approach would be useful.
Read full review
  • Pre built integrations are great, but the variety could be better.
  • Page loading times can be a bottle neck.
  • Tag suggestions are not always relevant.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Overall, usability is high and fairly intuitive
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
We haven't had any issues with support!
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
I only briefly had an experience with Hitask but the biggest tale away for me was that MagicPixel a better user interface and user experience. This was really important to me because the more user friendly the tool is, theoretically we are spending less time using the tool but reaping an equitable value.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It let us deploy new pixels/fixes to pixels independently from the IT deployment process.
  • It let us easily turn on/off and sort the pixel execution based on partners' priority, assuring better data tracking for more important partners.
  • It provides out of the box pixel implementation for tons of partners, but really often we need to rewrite the pixel from scratch as they're not up to date.
Read full review
  • Improved multi-integrative approach for less dev time implementing tags.
  • Easier testing of tags meant less down-time for misbehaving tags.
  • More mobile growth due to better tracking.
Read full review
ScreenShots