TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Concrete CMS

    Score9.2 out of 10
    N/AConcrete CMS (formerly Concrete5) is a free and open source, PHP built content management system for content on the web and also for intranets. It is optimized to support the creation of online magazines and newspapers.N/A

    Drupal

    Score6.9 out of 10
    N/ADrupal is a free, open-source content management system written in PHP that competes primarily with Joomla and Plone. The standard release of Drupal, known as Drupal core, contains basic features such as account and menu management, RSS feeds, page layout customization, and system administration.N/A
    Pricing
    Concrete CMSDrupal
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Concrete CMSDrupal
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Concrete CMSDrupal
    Considered Both Products
    Portland Labs
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Concrete5 is much easier to use than Drupal and has more functionality set up out of the box with just enough add-ons to get the job done. I have used both WordPress and Drupal, and this sits between them. Concrete5 is not quite as easy as WordPress but much easier than Drupal …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Concrete5 is easier to use than Drupal or Joomla, and beats them in terms of features. WordPress gives Concrete5 a run for its money as far as extension and theme availability, as well as user base and support availability. But Concrete5 beats WordPress hands down with features …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    I believe WordPress and Drupal to be superior products. But Concrete5 holds its own against them. I selected Concrete5 for real estate and marketing firms for the ease of use and updating. The drop and drag editor is hard to beat.
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    We did not select Concrete5 as we inherited it. If selecting again, we would use WordPress, Drupal or another CMS to meet our needs.
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    While more mature CMS technologies like Drupal and Joomla offer a more expanded function set, Concrete5 represents by far the lowest learning curve that I've seen in CMS, so it's great for the end user or non-technical designer, and more approachable than these other CMS …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    My initial test was to time how long it took to create a very basic site from scratch with no prior knowledge. Concrete CMS won decisively. Over time, I've worked on projects that use other systems, and the challenges I encounter always affirm my choice to stay with Concrete …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Concrete5 was far easier to use than alternatives--which is very important when handling support issues for clients. As a developer, the architecture makes it easier to extend the core functions elegantly without overwriting core code. Although a few other CMS platforms have …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    If your web team is tired of dealing with CMS training issues, you need to consider Concrete5. If your technical team and host are tired of dealing with website security issues, you need to consider Concrete5. If you're pulling your hair out over frequent update patches …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Concrete5 is by far the easiest for the end user. The user who edits the website can do so with very little training and not just with regards to the content. New pages and functions are easy to create and install. SEOand contact form functions are built in as standard.
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    I adopted Concrete5 after an end-user trial. With a variety of well known and lesser known CMS (including the above) in their fresh install state, I asked a group of users to register an account and then add a page with some text and an image on it. Concrete5 came out top by a …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Concrete5 is superior in most usecases to all other commonly used CMS platforms. The only thing where Joomla is outpreforming it is bulk editing. WordPress needs at least 20 plugins to do what Concrete5 does out of the box.
    Programming C5 templates and custom views is a dream, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Concrete5's UI is a bit more dated compared to WordPress, and the ecosystem for plugins is smaller. But out of the box, Concrete5 does more with its clean code than WordPress does. WordPress's UI and large plugin/community around it is its biggest strength as a product, not the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Concrete5 is probably the most user friendly for clients. I selected Concrete5 mostly because I found out about it and didn't really believe its capabilities and had to try it out. It pretty much is what a non-tech savvy person would want in a CMS for content management.
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    WordPress has a very confusing unintuitive admin section for the user to use while Concrete5 was much more intuitive and effective for people not use to working with a CMS solution. Components are selectable by areas you create in the page template and allows a user to quickly …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Personally I feel that WordPress is overly complicated and not as efficient as Concrete5. For example, Wordpress is a blogging platform hacked into a CMS, where Concrete5 is almost like a foundation with a CMS component. Concrete5 is very similar to Drupal just without the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Concrete5 absolutely shines in comparison. While there are areas where one system may perform a specific task better than Concrete5, when it comes to the whole package Concrete5 can't be beat.
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    I tried WordPress back when it was @ 2.5 or so. It was very blog oriented.
    Have used CMS Made Simple. I liked it but it got to be outdated.
    Drupal has a higher learning curve and would take a lo more training and time to implement.
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    I often use Perch for smaller site builds because it is simpler, lighter, and faster than Concrete5. Perch has become more and more capable and along the way is taking over some of the medium-size sites I build.
    WordPress was designed for blogs, and its ubiquity has made it a …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Comparing Concrete5 to Drupal and Joomla are easy. Joomla has a steep learning curve, and Concrete5 does not, this means if I have to teach a client to use a CMS, Concrete5 will be a much smoother process. Drupal also tends to have a bit of a learning curve, but beyond that …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    I find significant advantages over these other products. As a designer, I appreciate not having to design within a rigid structure, or shoehorn a design into particular format. As a developer, the security, useability and developer support from the core Concrete5 developers and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Before discovering Concrete5 I installed and looked at Drupal and Joomla. I never completely built a site using either one. I found there to be too steep of a learning curve for the end user. I've used WordPress to edit content on other sites although I've never built a site …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Concrete5 is the least contrived CMS I've ever run across. It's easily the quickest to theme and get up and running whereas Wordpress or Drupal could take months to get a Theme made Concrete5 can get one in a week. There's no reason to re-invent the wheel with loops and the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Concrete5 compares very well to other content management systems such as Wordpress, Drupal, Expression Engine and Joomla. Concrete5 seems to have the easiest learning curve from development standpoint and much easier to use for the end user.
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    Comparatively Concrete5 is sleek and sophisticated to most other CMS's. It's ease of use is similar to Joomla! however far exceeds the admin interface where as I find Joomla! to be complex for the average developer and mostly average content provider. The add-on's and modules …
    Incentivized
    Chose Concrete CMS
    I was overall pleased with the UI and the clarity of the development process. The upgrade process is a breeze, the CMS is light, powerful, and the community forum is great. Job is simply done with great results.
    Incentivized
    Drupal.org
    Chose Drupal
    Drupal can be more complex to learn, but it offers a much wider range of applications. Drupal’s front and backend can be customized from design to functionality to allow for a wide range of uses. If someone wants to create something more complex than a simple site or blog, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    Drupal has the best community and support system of any other CMS that I have used. Drupal is more flexible from A-Z including installation, building and customizing the CMS. The only other (free) CMS that is close, in my opinion, is Dot Net Nuke.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Concrete CMSDrupal
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Concrete CMS and Drupal
    Feature
    Concrete CMS
    9.5
    38 Ratings
    Drupal
    2.0
    66 Ratings
    Role-based user permissions9.538 Ratings2.066 Ratings
    Platform & Infrastructure
    Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Concrete CMS and Drupal
    Feature
    Concrete CMS
    9.7
    33 Ratings
    Drupal
    7.7
    63 Ratings
    API9.731 Ratings9.358 Ratings
    Internationalization / multi-language9.730 Ratings6.054 Ratings
    Web Content Creation
    Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Concrete CMS and Drupal
    Feature
    Concrete CMS
    8.4
    42 Ratings
    Drupal
    5.3
    69 Ratings
    WYSIWYG editor9.342 Ratings1.062 Ratings
    Code quality / cleanliness10.037 Ratings9.366 Ratings
    Admin section10.040 Ratings3.069 Ratings
    Page templates10.040 Ratings4.068 Ratings
    Library of website themes4.238 Ratings3.059 Ratings
    Mobile optimization / responsive design9.739 Ratings10.063 Ratings
    Publishing workflow7.737 Ratings9.367 Ratings
    Form generator6.639 Ratings3.064 Ratings
    Web Content Management
    Comparison of Web Content Management features of Concrete CMS and Drupal
    Feature
    Concrete CMS
    6.9
    40 Ratings
    Drupal
    5.0
    68 Ratings
    Content taxonomy8.939 Ratings10.063 Ratings
    SEO support9.039 Ratings1.063 Ratings
    Bulk management6.039 Ratings10.059 Ratings
    Availability / breadth of extensions5.439 Ratings2.062 Ratings
    Community / comment management5.439 Ratings2.062 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Concrete CMSDrupal
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.2
    (59 ratings)
    2.0
    (78 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (22 ratings)
    8.2
    (18 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (12 ratings)
    3.0
    (10 ratings)
    Availability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.7
    (3 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.9
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    5.0
    (4 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.8
    (6 ratings)
    5.1
    (4 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)