Cone Proposal-to-Payment vs. RFP360

Cone Proposal-to-Payment

RFP360

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Cone Proposal-to-Payment	Score 0.0 out of 10	N/A	Cone Proposal-to-Payment is a platform that simplifies the process of selling and collecting money. For professional services and startups, it is used in proposal management. With its unified workflow, Cone automates proposals, e-Sign, invoicing, and payment collections. It allows users to create interactive web proposals and receive e-signatures. The platform generates invoices for signed proposals. It takes care of the Account Receivables process with automation, integrating with accounting…	$0
RFP360	Score 9.0 out of 10	N/A	RFP360, from Responsive (formerly RFPIO) is used by organizations to request information, respond to requests and connect, aiming to make the RFP and proposal process more efficient, effective, collaborative, consistent and repeatable for everyone.	N/A

Pricing

Cone Proposal-to-Payment

RFP360

Editions & Modules

Cone Proposal-to-Payment: $0

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Cone Proposal-to-Payment	RFP360
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes	Yes

Entry-level Setup Fee

Optional

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

Pricing is based on use case and client requirements.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Cone Proposal-to-Payment	RFP360

Features

Cone Proposal-to-Payment

RFP360

Proposal Creation & Organization

Comparison of Proposal Creation & Organization features of Product A and Product B
	Cone Proposal-to-Payment - Ratings	RFP360 9.0 5 Ratings 12% above category average
Proposal templates	00 Ratings	8.24 Ratings
Proposal content library updates	00 Ratings	9.25 Ratings
Guided proposal creation	00 Ratings	8.74 Ratings
Searchable proposal database	00 Ratings	9.85 Ratings

Proposal Collaboration & Workflow

Comparison of Proposal Collaboration & Workflow features of Product A and Product B
	Cone Proposal-to-Payment - Ratings	RFP360 9.5 5 Ratings 16% above category average
RFP management & response	00 Ratings	9.85 Ratings
Proposal collaboration & approval	00 Ratings	9.65 Ratings
User permissions/proposal editing controls	00 Ratings	9.54 Ratings
Sales proposal workflow	00 Ratings	9.33 Ratings
Proposal automation user interface	00 Ratings	9.33 Ratings

Proposal Delivery

Comparison of Proposal Delivery features of Product A and Product B
	Cone Proposal-to-Payment - Ratings	RFP360 9.7 3 Ratings 18% above category average
Proposal content tracking	00 Ratings	9.73 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Cone Proposal-to-Payment	RFP360
Small Businesses	QuoteWerks Score 9.4 out of 10	QuoteWerks Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	QuoteWerks Score 9.4 out of 10	QuoteWerks Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises	Conga CPQ Score 8.5 out of 10	Conga CPQ Score 8.5 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Cone Proposal-to-Payment	RFP360
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Cone Proposal-to-Payment	RFP360
Likelihood to Recommend	Cone No answers on this topic	Responsive (formerly RFPIO) In my opinion, RFP360 is well suited for any mid-to-large-scale RFP/Search project. It is probably overkill for smaller, less extensive projects, and time required for setup might outweigh any potential efficiencies. Incentivized Rick Harris Principal Read full review
Pros	Cone No answers on this topic	Responsive (formerly RFPIO) Sleek, modern design Fast to use Efficient CSM team walking you through steps Upload past RFPs to pick and pull Incentivized Francesco Gioeli Enterprise Account Executive Read full review
Cons	Cone No answers on this topic	Responsive (formerly RFPIO) Handle PowerPoint Templates Detect duplicates before saved Nothing else Incentivized Lawrence Kaiser Vice President of Marketing and Communications Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	Cone No answers on this topic	Responsive (formerly RFPIO) This tool has been fantastic as we have revamped our RFP process. We are much faster and far more efficient.Our win rate is up, but I am not 100% sure this is the cause, but I love to see it. The customer support and training are also fantastic. Thumbs up! Incentivized Lawrence Kaiser Vice President of Marketing and Communications Read full review
Usability	Cone No answers on this topic	Responsive (formerly RFPIO) Very easy to navigate and use. Very intuitive user interface Incentivized Lawrence Kaiser Vice President of Marketing and Communications Read full review
Support Rating	Cone No answers on this topic	Responsive (formerly RFPIO) Excellent support during the training process. Since we were onboarded, we have not had too many questions, but when we did, they were answered promptly and thoroughly. We have been very satisfied. Incentivized Lawrence Kaiser Vice President of Marketing and Communications Read full review
Implementation Rating	Cone No answers on this topic	Responsive (formerly RFPIO) onboarding and training were great Incentivized Lawrence Kaiser Vice President of Marketing and Communications Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Cone No answers on this topic	Responsive (formerly RFPIO) I was not involved in the process of selecting RFP360 for our firm, so I am largely unfamiliar with competitors. I am, however, quite pleased with RFP360 as a user, and am confident that my colleagues who were responsible for making the decision were thorough and discerning. Incentivized Rick Harris Principal Read full review
Return on Investment	Cone No answers on this topic	Responsive (formerly RFPIO) Quicker RFP turnaround time leads to money saved. Better RFP responses lead to more closed business. Better team alignment lead leads to high efficiency. Incentivized Josh Davis Enterprise Sales Engineer Read full review
ScreenShots	Cone Proposal-to-Payment Screenshots	RFP360 Screenshots