CONTENTdm vs. NetX

CONTENTdm

CONTENTdm

5 Reviews and Ratings

NetX

NetX

2 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
CONTENTdm	Score 6.2 out of 10	N/A	CONTENTdm is a DAM for libraries, from OCLC headquartered in Dublin, Ohio.	N/A
NetX	Score 10.0 out of 10	N/A	NetX, NetXposure, Inc headquartered in Portland, offers their eponymous Digital Asset Management platform, boasting an onboarding team has more than a decade of experience in DAM, which allows them to tailor NetX to meet specific needs and timeline, and the ability to make future changes to a team's workflows.	N/A

Pricing

CONTENTdm

NetX

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
CONTENTdm	NetX
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	CONTENTdm	NetX
Considered Both Products	CONTENTdm Lori Atkins University Archivist of South Texas Archives Chose CONTENTdm We selected CONTENTdm because it had a good reputation, was used by many institutions, provided a good product, and supplied feedback and monthly reports. We are wondering about DPLA and if that will be the next evolution or platform. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose CONTENTdm We are evaluating Hydra, Islandora Incentivized Helpful?	NetX No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
	CONTENTdm	NetX
Small Businesses	CoSchedule Marketing Suite Score 10.0 out of 10	CoSchedule Marketing Suite Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	CoSchedule Marketing Suite Score 10.0 out of 10	CoSchedule Marketing Suite Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises	MediaValet Score 9.1 out of 10	MediaValet Score 9.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	CONTENTdm	NetX
Likelihood to Recommend	7.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	CONTENTdm	NetX
Likelihood to Recommend	Good if one does not have a lot of IT support such as our smaller university. Incentivized Lori Atkins University Archivist of South Texas Archives Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	Constant URLs User interface is good Run by OCLC, not likely to disappear Incentivized Lori Atkins University Archivist of South Texas Archives Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	As a digital asset management system, one would expect the capability of managing preservation, which CONTENTdm lacks. Lack of batch updating and other advanced metadata management capabilities. The usage statistics does not work, and the company is not planning to fix it, at least based the interaction with tech support staff. Customers were referred to use Google Analytics. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	We are evaluating Hydra, Islandora Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	It helped us to get started with our digital collections projects at a relatively low cost. As our needs grew, it became apparent that we needed something more powerful, and that provides better workflows and better statistics and is able to handle the whole life cycle of digitation projects. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots