Contentsquare vs. Convert Experiences

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Contentsquare
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Contentsquare is a digital experience analytics cloud designed to help companies understand hidden customer behaviors, and use those insights to drive more successful experiences. It includes functionality from the former Clicktale heatmap, session recording, and A/B testing tool and now boasts a suite of customer journey analytic capabilities.N/A
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Convert Experiences is an experimentation platform that offers features and support to run A/B tests across multiple growth channels. Its enterprise-ready advanced features include full stack experimentation, multi-page testing, post-segmentation, sequential testing, targeting with 40+ filters, triggering tests based on data in other apps (data sources), dynamic triggers, complex goal tracking, and a secure API. It includes 90+ out-of-the box integrations in a…
$299
per month 100k tested users per month
Pricing
ContentsquareConvert Experiences
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Growth
$299
per month 100k tested users per month
Pro
$5988
per year 3M tested users available upfront
Enterprise
Pricing available on request
From 1M tested users/mo (billed annually)
Enterprise
Pricing available on request
From 1M tested users/mo (billed annually)
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ContentsquareConvert Experiences
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details1. Annual contract or monthly payments available (40% discount for annual pricing). 2. Pricing is not feature dependent. Some features like integrations, goals, Live Logs are necessary to test successfully. This is why Convert caps by unique tested users - basically visitors who have been bucketed to see a variation and are unique to that variation. As a result the app tested users are always </= the site's net traffic.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ContentsquareConvert Experiences
Considered Both Products
Contentsquare
Chose Contentsquare
ContentSquare [(Clicktale)] is going deeper on UX understanding than traditional web analytics tools. You can truly understand how a page is used (where users click or even miss click, on which part of the page they are spending most of their time, if some links are clicked but …
Chose Contentsquare
ClickTale is now a step ahead of the competition since it delivers insights based on pre-defined business KPIs and customer journeys that we have set up. We can also segment our traffic and easily sift through the many recordings finding the ones that match our lookup criteria. …
Chose Contentsquare
The only other website analytical tool I have used is Google Analytics. They both have some overlap but Google Analytics is much more broad, while ClickTale focuses on what it does and provides tools and analysis to work within its area of expertise. When used together, more …
Chose Contentsquare
We used CrazyEgg prior to ClickTale. CrazyEgg is simpler to use and much less expensive, but you get what you pay for. ClickTale gives us more capabilities that we desired. If you are a small start up with few people dedicated to the web, go with CrazyEgg. If you are a larger …
Chose Contentsquare
Google in-page analytics- while it does many of the things Clicktale does and for free, it lacks the full featured offering that Clicktale provides. Mouse Recordings alone are worth it. They allow our new designers to watch and learn from real customers, then create solutions …
Chose Contentsquare
Tealeaf was way too expensive for us. ClickTale was a much more economical solution that still provides enterprise level service and quality!
Convert Experiences
Chose Convert Experiences
Three words: value for money. In a due diligence comparison, Convert Experiences came up more than twice less expensive than the nearest competitor, while offering more product features, better performance and a quick response time with support/sales agents that actually …
Chose Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences sits in a niche of great products, against which it competes very well and remains held in high regard as it achieves pretty much everything that the bigger platforms put on the table but in a more cost-effective model. The reason we initially chose …
Chose Convert Experiences
Convert has the best JS code editor for advanced users (and developers). It doesn't have as great integration with GA as Google Optimize, but it also doesn't have a limit to 5 tests at one time. It's also much easier to use than Optimizely.
Chose Convert Experiences
Although not as robust as Adobe Target, Convert fills the niche with solid functionality at a great price. Comparable to Optimizely and far above Google Optimize.
Chose Convert Experiences
Although VWO is slightly cheaper it flickers quite a bit, hence why I originally looked into alternative software to use for A/B testing. VWO also has other features that could be useful, but they can be found in tools you may already be using, like Hotjar. Also, their support …
Chose Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences has a better UI, better reporting and is a faster platform.
Chose Convert Experiences
Convert was selected based on price point, feature set, and UI/UX. All three are very friendly to new testers and small to mid-market size companies. Their UI and tool workflow is the best out of all of the non-enterprise solutions that I have tried. There is some small room …
Chose Convert Experiences
There were a number of other tools I used. Specifically though: they expose the DMP features that some other companies price into oblivion and enterprise levels (if the other tools have them at all!)

I feel like I've gushed a lot about the DMP and power user features of Convert …
Chose Convert Experiences
Convert is better vs. Optimizely and VWO for the following reasons:
  • Better pricing
  • Faster App - easier and quicker to create tests, less clunky but just as powerful as the others
Chose Convert Experiences
The biggest point for Convert Experiences is definitely the price and the completeness of their packages. Their Magento plugin makes it great for running tests on ecommerce stores. One thing that's missing for me is deeper insights into revenue (something optimizely does …
Chose Convert Experiences
Convert works similar to Optimizely, but at a more competitive rate.
Chose Convert Experiences
Visual Website Optimizer's feature set is not as well suited to advanced experiments (it doesn't seem to allow direct editing of variation code). Optimizely is expensive and their agency plan requires a 12 month minimum contract. Support is not as great. Optimizely also does …
Chose Convert Experiences
While Optimizely is an amazing A/B testing tool, Convert has almost the exact same offerings but at a much lower cost. The customer and technical support are excellent as well, and Dennis's insights and strategy calls are very helpful.
Chose Convert Experiences
Visual Website Optimizer costs too much and misses a lot of transactions due to third-party cookies. Optimizely flat out refused to support Shopify. They withdrew their app from the marketplace in 2014.
Features
ContentsquareConvert Experiences
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Convert Experiences
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
9.7
Ratings
3% above category average
Convert Experiences
9.4
Ratings
11% above category average
Heatmap tool8.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Click analytics10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Scroll maps10.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Conversion tracking10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Goal tracking10.00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Session Recording and Replay10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
User Segmentation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Form fill analysis00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Test reporting00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Results segmentation00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
CSV export00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
-
Ratings
Convert Experiences
9.4
Ratings
13% above category average
a/b experiment testing00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Split URL testing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Multivariate testing00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Mobile app testing00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Test significance00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Advanced code editor00 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Page surveys00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Visitor recordings00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Preview mode00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Test duration calculator00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Experiment scheduler00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Client-side tests00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Server-side tests00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
-
Ratings
Convert Experiences
9.9
Ratings
15% above category average
Standard visitor segmentation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Traffic allocation control00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Website personalization00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ContentsquareConvert Experiences
Small Businesses
Smartlook
Smartlook
Score 8.2 out of 10
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Score 7.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Metric
Quantum Metric
Score 8.0 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Quantum Metric
Quantum Metric
Score 8.0 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ContentsquareConvert Experiences
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.5
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ContentsquareConvert Experiences
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited to businesses with a full time web analyst that will be using the tools to create actionable reports that drive action in the company. It is less appropriate where companies are just looking for some new tools and it will be forgotten soon after implementation. If a website is critical to your business and you have dedicated resources or consultants to help you understand the data, then it is invaluable. I love it.
Read full review
Definitely well suited for budget conscious companies that want a solid array of functionality but without having to pay an exorbitant amount. Great for marketing and analytics team members that need the ability to get in and set up tests w/o dev assistance. But, functionality is there for developers to get in and set up more complicated tests.
Read full review
Pros
  • The qualitative aspects of user experience are very well captured by ClickTale. We can get solid actionable insights through the various dashboards which track mouse movements, clicks, scrolls, etc.
  • The visual conversion funnels give a very good high level view of landing page performance and how they work together.
  • The video recordings are especially helpful. The user behavior captured is especially helpful in making decisions about user interface - form fields, call to actions, etc.
Read full review
  • The platform is good value for money, comparing its features and prices to some of the bigger players.
  • The tool is very flexible and can be used for simpler tests right through to much more challenging and rewarding testing but does require a more thorough knowledge of the platform.
  • Their support team is always available and always responsive, not resting until resolutions are met.
Read full review
Cons
  • Looking at isolated recordings without creating a segment, we still have to use the old interface
  • User interface has been massively improved but there are a few nags here and there that still need to be addressed
  • Mobile and desktop should be shown side by side and not separately
Read full review
  • The only thing I'm really missing is segmentation during or after testing of the results by device, new users etc., within the results page. Targeting of users based on segments is obviously possible.
  • There are a few inconsistencies in their user interface that I would have liked to see differently. This could be personal taste though.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
For small companies with limited user testing budgets, ClickTale serves as a useful user testing tool. When I cannot get the funds for in depth user testing, I always know that I have a baseline of information I can rely on
Read full review
Couldn't live without this, no other tool does precisely what we need them to do
Read full review
Usability
I had some issues interacting with viewing recordings of a specific page by many users but my impression was that this was going to be fixed.
Read full review
To use the platform in the context of developing enhanced tests that stretch the platform there is as with most things a learning curve. However, if you're a casual user or have standard experiments that you wish to run you would be easily able to hit the ground running.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I use support only in very emergency cases. The support hasn't been very helpful and suggests the problem is on my site
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ContentSquare [(Clicktale)] is going deeper on UX understanding than traditional web analytics tools. You can truly understand how a page is used (where users click or even miss click, on which part of the page they are spending most of their time, if some links are clicked but bad positioned on the page...), and that's a thing you can't really measure trough a traditional web analytics tool.
Read full review
Convert was selected based on price point, feature set, and UI/UX. All three are very friendly to new testers and small to mid-market size companies. Their UI and tool workflow is the best out of all of the non-enterprise solutions that I have tried. There is some small room for improvement, but that only really affects power users or tests that require significant coding/development work to execute.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • I learned how effective some of our image carousels were. How only 10% of a page visitors were being exposed to only the first slide. People were scrolling down or leaving the page without ever being exposed to 90% of the content. Once I provided this input to stakeholders it was an easy sell to redesign this aspect of the page.
  • I used the mouse-move heat map to analyze user interaction with the footer. Showing stakeholders the before and after redesign heat maps did wonders for improving my credibility as an usability analyst.
  • We used Clicktale to help analyze our 404 error page effectiveness. Our redesign gave us a 14% lower bounce rate on our redesigned 404 error page. Stakeholders appreciated a quantitative measure to gauge the success of that project.
Read full review
  • Using Convert has allowed us to make quick decisions on site edits and price changes. Seeing and sharing quick results makes our operations much more profitable.
  • Connecting the tests with Shopify has produced very valuable and timely results that we can act upon as soon as we see statistically significant results.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Convert Experiences Screenshots

Screenshot of the conditions that can be stacked to build complex goals that can track (almost) any visitor action to determine the test outcome.Screenshot of granular targeting so only the right people view variations. 40+ conditions included.Screenshot of the API that brings Convert's capabilities to a testing ecosystem.Screenshot of experiment reports that can be shared with stakeholders and on social media.Screenshot of several advanced test types that are available, including multipage (funnel) experiments.Screenshot of full-stack experimentation that can be used to run tests anywhere that Convert code can be deployed.