Contentsquare vs. GTmetrix

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Contentsquare
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Contentsquare is a digital experience analytics cloud designed to help companies understand hidden customer behaviors, and use those insights to drive more successful experiences. It includes functionality from the former Clicktale heatmap, session recording, and A/B testing tool and now boasts a suite of customer journey analytic capabilities.N/A
GTmetrix
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
Gtmetrix is an analytics tool focused on determining website performance with features like page load speed details, video capture, and the ability to test from multiple regions around the world.
$10.67
per month
Pricing
ContentsquareGTmetrix
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Solo
$10.67
per month
Starter
$21.25
per month
Growth
$42.50
per month
Basic
Free
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ContentsquareGTmetrix
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ContentsquareGTmetrix
Considered Both Products
Contentsquare
Chose Contentsquare
ContentSquare [(Clicktale)] is going deeper on UX understanding than traditional web analytics tools. You can truly understand how a page is used (where users click or even miss click, on which part of the page they are spending most of their time, if some links are clicked but …
Chose Contentsquare
ClickTale is now a step ahead of the competition since it delivers insights based on pre-defined business KPIs and customer journeys that we have set up. We can also segment our traffic and easily sift through the many recordings finding the ones that match our lookup criteria. …
Chose Contentsquare
The only other website analytical tool I have used is Google Analytics. They both have some overlap but Google Analytics is much more broad, while ClickTale focuses on what it does and provides tools and analysis to work within its area of expertise. When used together, more …
Chose Contentsquare
We used CrazyEgg prior to ClickTale. CrazyEgg is simpler to use and much less expensive, but you get what you pay for. ClickTale gives us more capabilities that we desired. If you are a small start up with few people dedicated to the web, go with CrazyEgg. If you are a larger …
Chose Contentsquare
Google in-page analytics- while it does many of the things Clicktale does and for free, it lacks the full featured offering that Clicktale provides. Mouse Recordings alone are worth it. They allow our new designers to watch and learn from real customers, then create solutions …
Chose Contentsquare
Tealeaf was way too expensive for us. ClickTale was a much more economical solution that still provides enterprise level service and quality!
GTmetrix
Chose GTmetrix
Given we are doing the work to improve in Google to a large degree - the Google product is essential. But GTMetrix may use their info as well as other independent stuff to be a little better. I appreciate the way GTMetrix provides the info - cleaner and clearer and thus quicker …
Chose GTmetrix
Compared to the products I have listed PageSpeed Insights is probably the closest to what GTMetrix does and many times those 2 tabs are open side by side. SEMrush is a full SEO platform and though it can do much of what GTmetrix does it is also quite expensive and does a lot …
Chose GTmetrix
The data visualization aspect of GTmetrix is better than the competition. It uses letters A, B, and C to help rate speed and performance. It shows the time, size of the page, and uses colors as well. Green is fast, orange and red are slow (poor).
There are also articles …
Chose GTmetrix
GTmetrix gathers data from both Google PageSpeed and YSlow at same time, so we're using it more often than Google's alternative.
On the other hand, Google PageSpeed offers neat features like download optimized images, scripts and CSS (which GTmetrix don't), so it could be a …
Features
ContentsquareGTmetrix
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
GTmetrix
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
9.7
Ratings
3% above category average
GTmetrix
10.0
Ratings
17% above category average
Heatmap tool8.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Click analytics10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Scroll maps10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Conversion tracking10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Goal tracking10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Session Recording and Replay10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
User Segmentation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Form fill analysis00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Test reporting00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Results segmentation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
CSV export00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
-
Ratings
GTmetrix
9.4
Ratings
14% above category average
a/b experiment testing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Split URL testing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Multivariate testing00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Mobile app testing00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Test significance00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Advanced code editor00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Page surveys00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Visitor recordings00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Preview mode00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Test duration calculator00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Experiment scheduler00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Client-side tests00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Server-side tests00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
-
Ratings
GTmetrix
10.0
Ratings
16% above category average
Standard visitor segmentation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Website personalization00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ContentsquareGTmetrix
Small Businesses
Smartlook
Smartlook
Score 8.2 out of 10
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Metric
Quantum Metric
Score 8.0 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Quantum Metric
Quantum Metric
Score 8.0 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ContentsquareGTmetrix
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
4.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ContentsquareGTmetrix
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited to businesses with a full time web analyst that will be using the tools to create actionable reports that drive action in the company. It is less appropriate where companies are just looking for some new tools and it will be forgotten soon after implementation. If a website is critical to your business and you have dedicated resources or consultants to help you understand the data, then it is invaluable. I love it.
Read full review
GTmetrix is very well suited for small organizations or startups that do not have sufficient technical staff for site optimization. GTmetrix also comes with the free version, which allows users to use their service for free for up to three websites, which is a good option. However, this might not be the best option for a large organization that works in different technical domains and have a good number of technical staff.
Read full review
Pros
  • The qualitative aspects of user experience are very well captured by ClickTale. We can get solid actionable insights through the various dashboards which track mouse movements, clicks, scrolls, etc.
  • The visual conversion funnels give a very good high level view of landing page performance and how they work together.
  • The video recordings are especially helpful. The user behavior captured is especially helpful in making decisions about user interface - form fields, call to actions, etc.
Read full review
  • Really complete report of performance issues.
  • Get reports from PageSpeed and YSlow at same time.
  • Gives a score from each separate tool, also displays loading time, page size and total requests very easily.
Read full review
Cons
  • Looking at isolated recordings without creating a segment, we still have to use the old interface
  • User interface has been massively improved but there are a few nags here and there that still need to be addressed
  • Mobile and desktop should be shown side by side and not separately
Read full review
  • They might consider improving their checking process speed, it often takes a huge time to display the performance report. This is even longer for non-logged-in users.
  • Previously two different options of Google's Pagespeeds and Yahoo's lighthouse were shown in the report section, now only combined report is shown. I personally like the two reports from different sources.
  • Non-tech savvy persons might not find it so easy to use.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
For small companies with limited user testing budgets, ClickTale serves as a useful user testing tool. When I cannot get the funds for in depth user testing, I always know that I have a baseline of information I can rely on
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
I had some issues interacting with viewing recordings of a specific page by many users but my impression was that this was going to be fixed.
Read full review
It's easy to use fast, data is easy to read and take aways are great too.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I have never had the need to use GTmetrix support. Therefore, there is really no way for me to give a grade here. However, if you are on a paid plan my guess and it is a guess, is that their support is as good as the tool is. There are a lot more features in the paid plans, reporting. monitoring etc. I could see where support could come into play as these features are added to the account
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ContentSquare [(Clicktale)] is going deeper on UX understanding than traditional web analytics tools. You can truly understand how a page is used (where users click or even miss click, on which part of the page they are spending most of their time, if some links are clicked but bad positioned on the page...), and that's a thing you can't really measure trough a traditional web analytics tool.
Read full review
Given we are doing the work to improve in Google to a large degree - the Google product is essential. But GTMetrix may use their info as well as other independent stuff to be a little better. I appreciate the way GTMetrix provides the info - cleaner and clearer and thus quicker to address.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • I learned how effective some of our image carousels were. How only 10% of a page visitors were being exposed to only the first slide. People were scrolling down or leaving the page without ever being exposed to 90% of the content. Once I provided this input to stakeholders it was an easy sell to redesign this aspect of the page.
  • I used the mouse-move heat map to analyze user interaction with the footer. Showing stakeholders the before and after redesign heat maps did wonders for improving my credibility as an usability analyst.
  • We used Clicktale to help analyze our 404 error page effectiveness. Our redesign gave us a 14% lower bounce rate on our redesigned 404 error page. Stakeholders appreciated a quantitative measure to gauge the success of that project.
Read full review
  • A great free tool that is does what it is meant to do very well.
  • Due to its simplicity and speed it is highly efficient.
Read full review
ScreenShots