Contentsquare vs. Request Metrics

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Contentsquare
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Contentsquare is a digital experience analytics cloud designed to help companies understand hidden customer behaviors, and use those insights to drive more successful experiences. It includes functionality from the former Clicktale heatmap, session recording, and A/B testing tool and now boasts a suite of customer journey analytic capabilities.N/A
Request Metrics
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Realtime website performance tests generated from real user experience on a website. Request Metrics gathers performance data from actual users, rather than a synthetic tests. Request Metrics is website performance monitoring, simplified for small high performance teams. There is no complicated query languages to learn or theoretical metrics to understand. The service provides reports that help keep a website running fast, and customers…
$37
per month
Pricing
ContentsquareRequest Metrics
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Essentials
$37
per month
Professional
$96
per month
Custom
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ContentsquareRequest Metrics
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ContentsquareRequest Metrics
Features
ContentsquareRequest Metrics
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
8.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Request Metrics
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
9.7
Ratings
3% above category average
Request Metrics
-
Ratings
Heatmap tool8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Click analytics10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scroll maps10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Conversion tracking10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Goal tracking10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Session Recording and Replay10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
User Segmentation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Contentsquare
-
Ratings
Request Metrics
9.0
Ratings
16% above category average
Application monitoring00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Threshold alerts00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Application performance management console00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
User Ratings
ContentsquareRequest Metrics
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ContentsquareRequest Metrics
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited to businesses with a full time web analyst that will be using the tools to create actionable reports that drive action in the company. It is less appropriate where companies are just looking for some new tools and it will be forgotten soon after implementation. If a website is critical to your business and you have dedicated resources or consultants to help you understand the data, then it is invaluable. I love it.
Read full review
Request Metrics is great for small web development teams that want to make fast web applications. It was quick for us to get started and we could use the reports right away without having to read through documentation. If you just need to get some performance metrics, Request Metrics is perfect. It would not be so good for a larger team or a complex backend application as it is pretty limited in what it can measure.
Read full review
Pros
  • The qualitative aspects of user experience are very well captured by ClickTale. We can get solid actionable insights through the various dashboards which track mouse movements, clicks, scrolls, etc.
  • The visual conversion funnels give a very good high level view of landing page performance and how they work together.
  • The video recordings are especially helpful. The user behavior captured is especially helpful in making decisions about user interface - form fields, call to actions, etc.
Read full review
  • Performance charts are really simple and easy for us to understand what is happening
  • It was easy to get started and doesn't need administration or training
  • It's affordable for our team
  • It's fast
Read full review
Cons
  • Looking at isolated recordings without creating a segment, we still have to use the old interface
  • User interface has been massively improved but there are a few nags here and there that still need to be addressed
  • Mobile and desktop should be shown side by side and not separately
Read full review
  • I wish that it could also do uptime checking of the site
  • There is not enough detail to drill into individual users
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
For small companies with limited user testing budgets, ClickTale serves as a useful user testing tool. When I cannot get the funds for in depth user testing, I always know that I have a baseline of information I can rely on
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
I had some issues interacting with viewing recordings of a specific page by many users but my impression was that this was going to be fixed.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
ContentSquare [(Clicktale)] is going deeper on UX understanding than traditional web analytics tools. You can truly understand how a page is used (where users click or even miss click, on which part of the page they are spending most of their time, if some links are clicked but bad positioned on the page...), and that's a thing you can't really measure trough a traditional web analytics tool.
Read full review
We also consider Speedcurve and Calibre for monitoring. Speedcurve was really nice, but the reports were slow. We had to wait a lot to get information. It was also out of our budget and would require extra justification to use it. Calibre was also nice, but the numbers were based on synthetic rather than real user performance. We felt that this wasn't as helpful for us.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • I learned how effective some of our image carousels were. How only 10% of a page visitors were being exposed to only the first slide. People were scrolling down or leaving the page without ever being exposed to 90% of the content. Once I provided this input to stakeholders it was an easy sell to redesign this aspect of the page.
  • I used the mouse-move heat map to analyze user interaction with the footer. Showing stakeholders the before and after redesign heat maps did wonders for improving my credibility as an usability analyst.
  • We used Clicktale to help analyze our 404 error page effectiveness. Our redesign gave us a 14% lower bounce rate on our redesigned 404 error page. Stakeholders appreciated a quantitative measure to gauge the success of that project.
Read full review
  • The launch of our project dashboard was much smoother and more successful because we could fix problems earlier
  • It fit without our existing operations budget
Read full review
ScreenShots

Request Metrics Screenshots

Screenshot of an illustration of how Request Metrics tracks Core Web VitalsScreenshot of an example of a few website performance tracking reportsScreenshot of load sequences available for debuggingScreenshot of problem drill downScreenshot of SEO monitoring