Contentstack headquartered in San Francisco offers an API-first headless CMS. From desktops to smart phones, from kiosks to smart watches, from billboards to jumbotrons, from dashboards to VR headsets – content is delivered with the push of a button and optimized for every screen, device and channel.
N/A
Hygraph
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Hygraph (previously GraphCMS) is a native GraphQL Headless Content Management System (CMS) and now evolved as a Federated Content Platform, enabling teams across the world to unify, structure, enrich and distribute content from anywhere to anywhere.
$299
per month
Pricing
Contentstack
Hygraph
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Professional
$299
per month per project
Scale
$899
per month per project
Enterprise
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Contentstack
Hygraph
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
35% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Contentstack
Hygraph
Features
Contentstack
Hygraph
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
7.4
11 Ratings
9% below category average
Hygraph
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions
7.411 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
7.5
10 Ratings
1% below category average
Hygraph
-
Ratings
API
8.19 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
6.98 Ratings
00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
8.1
12 Ratings
5% above category average
Hygraph
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG editor
8.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Admin section
7.712 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page templates
7.68 Ratings
00 Ratings
Library of website themes
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
6.69 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publishing workflow
6.910 Ratings
00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack
6.4
12 Ratings
14% below category average
Hygraph
-
Ratings
Content taxonomy
7.210 Ratings
00 Ratings
SEO support
6.410 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bulk management
5.79 Ratings
00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions
6.58 Ratings
00 Ratings
Community / comment management
6.16 Ratings
00 Ratings
Hybrid CMS
Comparison of Hybrid CMS features of Product A and Product B
Contentstack has flexible functionality which opens up a lot of possibilities for businesses with proactive web development teams to create their own website builder app to compete with 3rd party agencies. This is especially useful in a large enterprise where non-technical teams often turn to expensive outside agencies which cost more in the long run than an up-front investment into an in-house application.
I would recommend GraphCMS to anyone who is also using Gatsby to build their website. If not, I would recommend them to consider GraphCMS but also consider other options. GraphCMS is a tool in which you are responsible to make the most out of it, but sometimes this requires more time and knowledge than a normal engineer may be able to handle. But with more time and attention, the reward of off-lifting content creation from the developers is a huge time saver in the long run.
In my opinion it's not very intuitive. I've found its difficult to understand how to best structure entries, especially if they are related
In my experience, entries can get difficult to understand if weren't the creator. It would be helpful to have some meta data around the entry itself and the fields within them in my opinion.
Integration with an A/B testing platform would be nice.
GraphCMS is very expensive at the enterprise level.
GraphCMS requires deep knowledge of the system and requires lots of time to be efficient with it (especially around creating specific data patterns/relationships).
Multiple times a day, the system will give us errors when attempting to save something but the errors are unclear as to what went wrong (can be irritating).
They have an in-app chat with their support team, who is always quick to respond and provide helpful answers. I've never walked away from an interaction without my issue being solved quickly and easily. They're also very communicative over email and are sure to follow up after any changes are made to ensure we're seeing the desired result. They are always very professional and easy to work with.
Contentstack has better international hosting support then Contentful and we found the presales and sales support people were MUCH more responsive than Contentful. The Sitecore sales process was very very slow and overly complex. We felt Sitecore had many features that were not valuable and the cost to benefit ratio was much lower compared to ContentStack
We picked GraphCMS since it used Graph API and easily integrated it into our Gatsby website. It was also cheap (free) and easy to test out the product, making it easier to prove to our company we should pay for the product in the long run. Lastly, it seems to have a bunch of support from other developers which makes us confident will be around for a while (and we won't need to replace it anytime soon). Note: I also looked at Directus and DatoCMS but these were not options within TrustRadius