Contractor Foreman vs. InEight

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Contractor Foreman
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Contractor Foreman is an online construction management software for contractors and boasts users among contractors in more than 75 countries.
$588
per year
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
InEight's modular project controls software connects complex project data to improve visibility and delivery in capital construction.N/A
Pricing
Contractor ForemanInEight
Editions & Modules
Basic
$588
per year
Standard
$948
per year
Plus
$1,497
per year
Pro
$1,990
per year
Unlimited
$2,988
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Contractor ForemanInEight
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPlans are based on features and licenses needed. Plus, Pro, and Unlimited plans include a 100-day money back guarantee.InEight offers a modular, integrated project controls platform. Because the InEight platform covers the entire construction lifecycle, customers purchase the software based on their specific needs – purchasing stand-alone products, a bundle of products, or the entire platform. As a result, the pricing will vary depending on the specific product, number of users and length of contract. Once InEight has identified the highest impact areas, they offer potential customers a custom proposal. The options they consider include: Per user pricing: typically annual subscriptions. Revenue-based: using a percentage of the customer’s revenue. Project-based: software use dedicated to a specific project or program of work.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Contractor ForemanInEight
Considered Both Products
Contractor Foreman
Chose Contractor Foreman
Combines everything into one software. CRM, Estimating, Project Management, Job Costing all in one. We prefer to train people on one software rather than several. When everyone is using the same program it's easier for team collaboration. It also eliminates the excuse the I …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Monday.com was limited and I noticed myself integrating other programs rather than just using Monday.com I used Zoho at a sales company and it was fine for that. One of my friends uses Zoho for HVAC and I liked the Contractor Foreman interface better.
Chose Contractor Foreman
Based on the on my previous experience Contractor Foreman rates right along side the other cost saving systems I have used. It does not compare well to the higher end systems based on everything else that the more expensive systems can do. I think it is right in line with the …
Chose Contractor Foreman
D-tools has a nicer UI but is very specific to the CI industry. Since we moved into the solar business primarily it no longer met our needs.
Chose Contractor Foreman
Way easier to use and learn for new employees joining the business.
Chose Contractor Foreman
I used Projul and Buildium when I was primarily managing rental properties rather than full home builds. Projul was great for estimating and invoicing, while Buildium served its purpose well at the time. Now, as a small construction company, Contractor Foreman provides …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Had all of the pieces we were looking for in one place. Ease of use between mobile & desktop devices. Competitive price. Additionally, their responsiveness through email has been quick and accommodating. I love
Chose Contractor Foreman
Contractor Foreman offered the most services for the best price. Lots of the other software options I have looked into were missing features such as a mobile app or accounting integrations and some were extremely expensive wanting a percentage of overall revenue.
Chose Contractor Foreman
Contractor Foreman: Much more affordable, making it a better fit for small to mid-sized contractors.
Procore: High cost, often requiring enterprise-level budgets, making it overkill for our 33-person company.
Chose Contractor Foreman
It all comes down to the number of features that Contractor Foreman packs into their software for the price they charge. I think it stacks up against Procore but for a small fraction of the cost. They offer more features geared to the commercial GC then other software …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Contractor Foreman is committed to not only update their software consistently, but they also are committed to adding new features as their clients request them. If there is a feature that they do not have, there probably is a plan to implement it in the near future. Our …
Chose Contractor Foreman
There's just no comparing these two. I'm actually going to suggest we keep CE to my boss, and here's why: Clearestimates is perfect for what I just described. You have a little job that you just BOOM it's done? Put it into Clearestimates. That system does not care at all if you …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Buildertrend, Procore and CoConstruct
Chose Contractor Foreman
Contractor Foreman is much easier to use than the other softwares demo'd. Ultimately we got stuck while exploring other softwares and found them a bit difficult to navigate. Contractor Foreman was also available at a fraction of the cost. While the other big name competitors …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Contractor Foreman has Far better pricing.
Contractor Foreman also offered a pricing guarantee (i am not sure of that is still the case).
There are a few features that the top tier subscriptions of the others offer that Contractor Foreman is lacking: specifically a "selections" …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Pricing is the big one, they both offer similar products, Construction Foreman is affordable and Procore is outrageously expensive.
Chose Contractor Foreman
All of these programs are a good fit for somebody, but what we liked about Contractor Foreman is the ease of use and that they listen to the needs we have and work to add them or fix them. The program can look a little intimidating at first but once you get it setup the way you …
InEight
Chose InEight
I've used SAP for more than 10 years before my current job in this company. The best thing in SAP, is exactly what I have commented before, it's a single one tool, that does all what InEight do.
Here at CCC, we have COINS for cost management, and I don't know exactly if InEight …
Chose InEight
InEight seems to be an improvement on SAP BPC, though I haven't used SAP BPC for invoice processing, But in terms of planning, forecasting, budgeting and variance analysis. InEight has an edge because it is mor user friendly and the data you get is more streamlined and fit for …
Chose InEight
InEight has been the first product that I have used and I wouldn't change it. Coming up from a hand to staff it has made my job easier to perform. Easier to keep track of quantities, hours, production being made throughout the project and makes it easier to access work plans …
Chose InEight
The two items that set InEight apart was the estimating module with the ability to track cost to the exact estimate line item and the ability to export manhours to payroll. The other software's were either lacking or deficient in these items.
Chose InEight
InEight Estimate integrated with SAP much easier and the overall GUI was much nicer. easy decision
Chose InEight
Both Sage Estimating and InEight programs have their unique capabilities. Sage Estimating is much more configured for use in detailed construction, the majority of which are for non-nuclear projects. InEight has so many more capabilities, especially in creating our own …
Chose InEight
We've evaluated the project controls functions, but they aren't as functional as InEight Estimate
Chose InEight
InEight is perfect for our work in Heavy Civil construction. Some of the other products are designed for different workflows and industries. We chose InEight specifically because it was related to the construction industry. Procore is incredibly comprehensive, and we just don't …
Chose InEight
InEight provides the tools that my business needs and its programs are geared troward the industry.
Chose InEight
We looked at HCSS and Bid 2 Win but chose Ineight due to the fact that it seemed more user friendly, plus I had used it at a former company when it was available from the Grantlun Corporation and was very familiar with it in its ease of use and reliability.
Chose InEight
No others were evaluated at this time
Chose InEight
heavy bid is okay for bid item work and has a few things in the quote folder screen that are nice and user friendly but the ability to tag is not as useful.
Chose InEight
InEight is more robust than the other services I have used. I think it does a better job of rolling up a massive amount of individual user data into one complete project progress report. I like that most of our clients also use it, which makes collaboration easier. I think it …
Chose InEight
InEight exceeded our expectations from [the] capability to cost. This product selection was a no-brainer for our department.
Chose InEight
Ecosys is used for project management reporting while InEight is used for document management.
Chose InEight
InEight is cheaper than both. It is more functional than Aconex, but not iTWO. InEight's GUI needs the most work to improve.
Chose InEight
I would prefer Aconex but the cost is too high. The overall layout and feel of Aconex are modern compared to InEight.
Chose InEight
  1. Allows you to save all file types to a document, easily identify which formats you do and don’t have and manage which formats you issue.
  2. Great bulk functionality. Manage multiple projects and large volume of documentation easily with less staff.
Chose InEight
As an issuing tool, InEight's TeamBinder is on par with Aconex. Solidworks EPDM creation of review workflows and revision numbering is better placed with handling multiple versions of the same document with the ability to revert to older versions if required. InEight's support …
Chose InEight
I have used Aconnex and have found InEight to be more flexible and works in partnership with us to provide the best solution.
Chose InEight
InEight has superior functionality over all of these systems.
Features
Contractor ForemanInEight
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
InEight
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Employment history5.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Organizational charting7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Organization and location management8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
6.5
Ratings
16% below category average
InEight
-
Ratings
Pay calculation6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors6.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment4.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct deposit files8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.5
Ratings
4% above category average
InEight
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
6.6
Ratings
14% below category average
InEight
7.0
Ratings
8% below category average
Dashboards6.80 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Standard reports6.60 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Custom reports6.60 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Data exportability6.60 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.1
Ratings
6% below category average
InEight
6.9
Ratings
9% below category average
Plan distribution & viewing6.90 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing6.50 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists6.80 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Photo documentation6.80 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Jobsite reports6.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Document sharing6.80 Ratings5.70 Ratings
RFI tools8.90 Ratings4.80 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals6.80 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Mobile app6.50 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Submittal design and management6.70 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Checklists6.90 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Meeting Minutes8.10 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Specifications7.40 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Change orders6.90 Ratings5.90 Ratings
As-built drawings00 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
6.9
Ratings
15% below category average
InEight
8.3
Ratings
4% above category average
Takeoff tools7.50 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Job costing6.80 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Cost databases6.70 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Cost calculator6.70 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Bid creation6.70 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Contractor ForemanInEight
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Revit
Revit
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Revit
Revit
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Contractor ForemanInEight
Likelihood to Recommend
6.9
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.8
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Contractor ForemanInEight
Likelihood to Recommend
Contractor Foreman has been a great tool for managing a variety of projects, from home remodels to large-scale builds. It works especially well for keeping everything organized in one place, whether it’s estimates, schedules, or job costs.
One scenario where it’s been really useful is in managing multiple jobs at once. With several remodels and new construction projects happening at the same time, having a centralized system to track progress, store documents, and communicate with subcontractors has helped keep everything on schedule. It’s also great for estimating—being able to quickly generate and send professional proposals has made bidding much more efficient.
It’s especially well-suited for projects that require a lot of moving parts, like tracking permits and compliance documents. For larger jobs, like school construction, it helps ensure that all approvals, budgets, and schedules stay on track without getting lost in a mess of paperwork.
Where it’s less ideal is for smaller, one-off jobs where a full project management system might be overkill. If it’s just a quick repair or a simple remodel, sometimes it’s easier to just handle things manually. The mobile app could also be a bit more intuitive for on-site use, especially for field updates and quick changes.
Overall, it’s a strong tool for contractors managing multiple projects, budgets, and teams. It keeps things organized and saves time, especially on jobs that require detailed tracking and coordination.
Read full review
Compared to other Estimating software I have used, InEight has superior capabilities and features. The ability to use a line item or an assembly to create an estimate is an outstanding feature of the program. The ability to create crew rates and use them in the estimate is a handy feature, especially when estimating construction projects.
Read full review
Pros
  • The service is top notch. You would be hard pressed to find other options with this kind of service.
  • The ability to have your project flow through the modules makes it a breeze to use.
  • Being able to track time as well is a key feature.
Read full review
  • Tracking labor and equipment hours to specific estimated scope line items
  • Creating detailed work breakdown structures within Estimate and using that same structure to apply cost to during the job
  • Creating custom data blocks in control to track progress and create forecasts
Read full review
Cons
  • We already heard from CF that they might implement this, but a Gantt chart available while in the estimating tab, before you submit the project
  • If you don't do things juuuusssst so, sometimes the system doesn't update or rejects what you're doing. It can be picky.
  • You have to constantly refresh using their provided button. Fixes a lot of issues and becomes second nature, but a little annoying at first.
Read full review
  • We do not use the search engine since it was last modified. It is no longer user friendly.
  • We used to like the way we could change the position of line items. The function has been changed to where it is not user friendly anymore.
  • The "Save" and "Delete" options are right next to each other. I have been after Ineight to change these for a long time but they have not.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Eliminated the need for our team to log into multiple systems to do their jobs which aligns to our Lean approach
Read full review
Some features with InEight's TeamBinder are worthy of single use, however the review feature and subsequent revision and version numbering could be improved. We will be aiming to roll out the package to encompass our internal documentation in the near future and will be in a better position to judge the usability after that point in time.
Read full review
Usability
Mostly great, especially for the price. The features appear to have definitely been designed by a team with a depth of construction specific experience. I also highly rate the usability because of the vast vast amount of customizability inherent in the system. It appears that almost all forms and features are customabizable on the company level and even specific to different individual users.
Read full review
I would give it an 8 out of 10 because the software can be a bit cumbersome to new users. It also takes a long time to set up the library and input all of your companies needs so that the software will provide the level of service required to estimate projects. However, once the software is set up it is a powerful tool. We only use a portion of what the software is capable of delivering
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Availability was good, FUNCTIONAL availability was more spotty
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Many times we had issues that turned out to be errors and bugs. At first, we would be told forcefully that there were no bugs, then we would document them, and we would get an acknowledgement but no apology for essentially either gaslighting us or being ignorant of their system
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Absolutely top notch! They were always there to help and immediately. Very happy with the communication they provided and the knowledge they had of their product. I would venture to say that they are one of the best in terms of support in their space.
Read full review
Every time I have contacted support, they have gotten back to [me] quickly and with a few solutions. I like that they seem to be US-based, so there is no language barrier when I try to communicate my problem. For the few times, they did not have a solution ready, they told me they would respond later after further research, and they actually followed up! Better than most support I have used in the past with other software.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Implementation was moderately difficult, it's the functionality and execution that are seriously lacking
Read full review
Since the original inception, I have been required to overhaul the system so that it is more user friendly and combines both aspects of our business, documentation and drawings. Being able to control revision and version numbering has been a key struggle that only staff training has been able to mark this as complete.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I used Projul and Buildium when I was primarily managing rental properties rather than full home builds. Projul was great for estimating and invoicing, while Buildium served its purpose well at the time. Now, as a small construction company, Contractor Foreman provides everything we need in one platform, making project management much more efficient.
Read full review
I've used SAP for more than 10 years before my current job in this company. The best thing in SAP, is exactly what I have commented before, it's a single one tool, that does all what InEight do. Here at CCC, we have COINS for cost management, and I don't know exactly if InEight would be able to do whatever that COINS does, but what I'm trying to say is that, for systems, as much less external communication, better. InEight is covering a great portion on planning, we will see schedule and estimate, it will definitely improve, so, waiting on that to see.
Read full review
Scalability
We had just 2 users
Read full review
InEight is a good system that has scaled nicely as the company has grown. the tools are still readily available and applicable for our larger scope of work. It has kept up with the growth of the company very nicely
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Cost Savings. Integration with QuickBooks and Bills improved financial control. 0-15% cost savings per project.
  • Time Savings: Streamlined project management led to a 20-30% reduction in administrative time, boosting on-site productivity, and with project tracking a 15-20% reduction in project delays.
  • Enhanced Collaboration: Centralized documentation and real-time updates improved team communication, increasing collaboration by 5-10%.
  • Overall, CF has provided a 10-15% return on investment annually through increased efficiency and cost control.
Read full review
  • We have gone from an $6.5M per year company to over $10M per year since integrating InEight in 2018
  • Job costing has really helped us to understand where the money is going and how to manage it better.
  • Being able to compare different estimates has sped up the estimation process and allowed us to be more competitive.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Contractor Foreman Screenshots

Screenshot of The client portal that lets customers to stay in the loop and know what is going on during all phases of the project.Screenshot of The custom dashboard which allows users to see the data that matters most to them.Screenshot of Stats that keep users informed to help them make use of data.Screenshot of The lead manager, that helps close deals without letting leads fall through the cracks.Screenshot of the Files & Photos screen, where making up plans can be done with Contractor Foreman.Screenshot of Time Cards, that display who is where and what they are doing.

InEight Screenshots

Screenshot of InEight Estimate’s Benchmarking feature, which allows users to compare high, low, and average costs, as well as productivity rates from past projects, to visually assess whether current estimates fall within a realistic range. With historical performance data at their fingertips, estimators can bid more strategically and deliver more reliable, data-driven estimates.Screenshot of InEight Estimate’s CBS Register, which provides a user-specific view of an estimate, allowing users to create unlimited WBS structures and custom rollups. With parametric cost item assemblies, estimators can generate more accurate, reliable, and data-driven estimates.Screenshot of InEight Document’s Dashboard, that delivers a centralized, visual view of project information across all modules. Interactive dashboard tiles make it easy to track document activity and maintain visibility into project performance.Screenshot of InEight Document’s Gallery, which offers a comprehensive visual library of all project-related files—including drawings, photos, and documents—so teams can quickly access and manage the content they need from one intuitive location.Screenshot of InEight Schedule’s Risk Management feature, which enables project teams to evaluate schedules through a risk-adjusted lens. By visualizing scenarios with varying confidence levels, teams can anticipate potential impacts and plan with greater certainty.Screenshot of InEight Change’s PCO Summary dashboard that delivers a visual summary of all potential change orders. This helps project teams evaluate impacts, track approvals, and manage changes proactively for better cost and scope control.