Contractor Foreman is an online construction management software for contractors and boasts users among contractors in more than 75 countries.
$588
per year
ProofHub
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
ProofHub is a SaaS based project management software from ProofHub LLC in Walnut, CA. It is an online project management and collaboration tool that comes with integrated Group chat, quick Discussions on projects, Workflows and boards, Project reports, among other features. Document (e.g. Excel, Powerpoint) uploading and sharing is supported, along with an integrated an Online proofing tool to aid in image and document review. ProofHub aims to enable teams to collaborate and…
$45
per month (billed annually) unlimited users
Pricing
Contractor Foreman
ProofHub
Editions & Modules
Basic
$588
per year
Standard
$948
per year
Plus
$1,497
per year
Pro
$1,990
per year
Unlimited
$2,988
per year
Essential
$45
per month (billed annually) unlimited users
Ultimate Control
$89
per month (billed annually) unlimited users
Large Team
$279
per month (billed annually) unlimited users
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Contractor Foreman
ProofHub
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Plans are based on features and licenses needed. Plus, Pro, and Unlimited plans include a 100-day money back guarantee.
Combines everything into one software. CRM, Estimating, Project Management, Job Costing all in one. We prefer to train people on one software rather than several. When everyone is using the same program it's easier for team collaboration. It also eliminates the excuse the I …
Monday.com was limited and I noticed myself integrating other programs rather than just using Monday.com I used Zoho at a sales company and it was fine for that. One of my friends uses Zoho for HVAC and I liked the Contractor Foreman interface better.
Based on the on my previous experience Contractor Foreman rates right along side the other cost saving systems I have used. It does not compare well to the higher end systems based on everything else that the more expensive systems can do. I think it is right in line with the …
I used Projul and Buildium when I was primarily managing rental properties rather than full home builds. Projul was great for estimating and invoicing, while Buildium served its purpose well at the time. Now, as a small construction company, Contractor Foreman provides …
Had all of the pieces we were looking for in one place. Ease
of use between mobile & desktop devices. Competitive price. Additionally,
their responsiveness through email has been quick and accommodating. I love
Contractor Foreman offered the most services for the best price. Lots of the other software options I have looked into were missing features such as a mobile app or accounting integrations and some were extremely expensive wanting a percentage of overall revenue.
Contractor Foreman: Much more affordable, making it a better fit for small to mid-sized contractors. Procore: High cost, often requiring enterprise-level budgets, making it overkill for our 33-person company.
It all comes down to the number of features that Contractor Foreman packs into their software for the price they charge. I think it stacks up against Procore but for a small fraction of the cost. They offer more features geared to the commercial GC then other software …
Contractor Foreman is committed to not only update their software consistently, but they also are committed to adding new features as their clients request them. If there is a feature that they do not have, there probably is a plan to implement it in the near future. Our …
There's just no comparing these two. I'm actually going to suggest we keep CE to my boss, and here's why: Clearestimates is perfect for what I just described. You have a little job that you just BOOM it's done? Put it into Clearestimates. That system does not care at all if you …
Contractor Foreman is much easier to use than the other softwares demo'd. Ultimately we got stuck while exploring other softwares and found them a bit difficult to navigate. Contractor Foreman was also available at a fraction of the cost. While the other big name competitors …
Contractor Foreman has Far better pricing. Contractor Foreman also offered a pricing guarantee (i am not sure of that is still the case). There are a few features that the top tier subscriptions of the others offer that Contractor Foreman is lacking: specifically a "selections" …
All of these programs are a good fit for somebody, but what we liked about Contractor Foreman is the ease of use and that they listen to the needs we have and work to add them or fix them. The program can look a little intimidating at first but once you get it setup the way you …
Unfortunately ProofHub did not compare very well. The pricing model is fantastic and I think the approach the software takes to creative project management isn't necessarily bad, it's just others do it better. For example, Wrike has very powerful and easy-to-manage form …
ProofHub helps me in collaborating easily with my clients. Everybody is so well connected to each other, that you just don’t have to spend extra bucks on one more tool or application to make things happen.
We used Basecamp in the past, but we did encounter some problems while working with it. But these concerns have been better addressed in ProofHub. It has a simple interface which is so easy to operate and this was not the case in Basecamp. ProofHub lets us quickly chat with our …
Features
Contractor Foreman
ProofHub
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
ProofHub
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employment history
5.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
6.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
7.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organizational charting
7.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organization and location management
8.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
6.5
Ratings
16% below category average
ProofHub
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
6.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
6.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
4.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
6.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
6.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.5
Ratings
4% above category average
ProofHub
-
Ratings
Tracking of all physical assets
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
6.8
Ratings
11% below category average
ProofHub
-
Ratings
Dashboards
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data exportability
6.70 Ratings
00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.2
Ratings
5% below category average
ProofHub
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
6.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Photo documentation
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Jobsite reports
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document sharing
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
RFI tools
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app
6.60 Ratings
00 Ratings
Submittal design and management
6.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Checklists
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
8.10 Ratings
00 Ratings
Specifications
7.40 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change orders
7.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.0
Ratings
13% below category average
ProofHub
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools
7.50 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job costing
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost databases
6.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost calculator
6.80 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bid creation
6.90 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
-
Ratings
ProofHub
10.0
Ratings
27% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Email integration
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
10.00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman has been a great tool for managing a variety of projects, from home remodels to large-scale builds. It works especially well for keeping everything organized in one place, whether it’s estimates, schedules, or job costs. One scenario where it’s been really useful is in managing multiple jobs at once. With several remodels and new construction projects happening at the same time, having a centralized system to track progress, store documents, and communicate with subcontractors has helped keep everything on schedule. It’s also great for estimating—being able to quickly generate and send professional proposals has made bidding much more efficient. It’s especially well-suited for projects that require a lot of moving parts, like tracking permits and compliance documents. For larger jobs, like school construction, it helps ensure that all approvals, budgets, and schedules stay on track without getting lost in a mess of paperwork. Where it’s less ideal is for smaller, one-off jobs where a full project management system might be overkill. If it’s just a quick repair or a simple remodel, sometimes it’s easier to just handle things manually. The mobile app could also be a bit more intuitive for on-site use, especially for field updates and quick changes. Overall, it’s a strong tool for contractors managing multiple projects, budgets, and teams. It keeps things organized and saves time, especially on jobs that require detailed tracking and coordination.
For small teams or a freelancer needing to receive work via forms and submit assets for simple yes/no approvals, it may be a great fit. It was just too lacking in the forms and proofing department for what we needed. There was also a lot of workarounds we were going to have to implement to try and achieve our desired workflow.
There are times when we have to make a website for a particular client. And this would involve not only the design, but also the content that would be reflected on the website. For this there has to be complete sync between the design and copywriting department. Earlier, this lead to a lot of goofups due to non-availability of one central medium for collaboration. But now with Proofhub, there’s one place for all people, files, docs and designs related to any active project.
Well, we are insatiable users, and keep wanting more and more. However, the team at Proofhub itself is always up on breaking the norms and bringing something new every now and then. So, that goes without saying that they would keep re-inventing and improving things with time.
I would surely renew it, as with Proofhub work has become much simpler and easier. Tasks are done faster, files, docs and designs are shared easily and feedback is received as and when required, directly on the file itself
Mostly great, especially for the price. The features appear to have definitely been designed by a team with a depth of construction specific experience. I also highly rate the usability because of the vast vast amount of customizability inherent in the system. It appears that almost all forms and features are customabizable on the company level and even specific to different individual users.
Many times we had issues that turned out to be errors and bugs. At first, we would be told forcefully that there were no bugs, then we would document them, and we would get an acknowledgement but no apology for essentially either gaslighting us or being ignorant of their system
Absolutely top notch! They were always there to help and immediately. Very happy with the communication they provided and the knowledge they had of their product. I would venture to say that they are one of the best in terms of support in their space.
Great support website and had reps follow up multiple times in our trial process. Getting started was very straightforward and adding people is easy too.
I used Projul and Buildium when I was primarily managing rental properties rather than full home builds. Projul was great for estimating and invoicing, while Buildium served its purpose well at the time. Now, as a small construction company, Contractor Foreman provides everything we need in one platform, making project management much more efficient.
We used Basecamp in the past, but we did encounter some problems while working with it. But these concerns have been better addressed in ProofHub. It has a simple interface which is so easy to operate and this was not the case in Basecamp. ProofHub lets us quickly chat with our team members over various work matters through its inbuilt chat feature and resolve them fast while Basecamp provides this feature through a third-party tool which added to our expenses and it was not a very convenient affair. ProofHub has got an inbuilt proofing tool which allows us to get quality feedback over designs instantly saving our time and costs, whereas Basecamp enables proofing through a third party tool which again was not convenient for us. ProofHub’s casper mode feature helps us to protect privacy and secrecy over confidential issues but Basecamp lacks such an important feature. So ProofHub has more to offer and better too in comparison to Basecamp. (answer to Describe how ProofHub stacks up against them and why you selected ProofHub.
Cost Savings. Integration with QuickBooks and Bills improved financial control. 0-15% cost savings per project.
Time Savings: Streamlined project management led to a 20-30% reduction in administrative time, boosting on-site productivity, and with project tracking a 15-20% reduction in project delays.
Enhanced Collaboration: Centralized documentation and real-time updates improved team communication, increasing collaboration by 5-10%.
Overall, CF has provided a 10-15% return on investment annually through increased efficiency and cost control.
Proofing: We have everything from press releases, social media posts, brochures, ads, etc. that have to be proofed. It has saved us tons of time!
Project Management: Our team has to schedule fewer meetings about project progress and "where are we at" discussions. Everyone can see it and everyone is accountable. It makes the days more productive by not getting trapped in those meetings.