Contractor Foreman vs. Revit

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Contractor Foreman
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Contractor Foreman is an online construction management software for contractors and boasts users among contractors in more than 75 countries.
$588
per year
Revit
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Autodesk’s Revit is a Building Information Modelling (BIM) tool. It enables architectural, MEP, structural, and engineering design, and provides analysis to support iterative workflows
$350
per month
Pricing
Contractor ForemanRevit
Editions & Modules
Basic
$588
per year
Standard
$948
per year
Plus
$1,497
per year
Pro
$1,990
per year
Unlimited
$2,988
per year
Monthly
$350
per month
1-Year
$2805
per year
3-Year
$8415
per 3 years
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Contractor ForemanRevit
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPlans are based on features and licenses needed. Plus, Pro, and Unlimited plans include a 100-day money back guarantee.Pricing available for monthly, annual, or 3-year subscriptions. Longer subscriptions offer greater discounts.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Contractor ForemanRevit
Considered Both Products
Contractor Foreman
Chose Contractor Foreman
Combines everything into one software. CRM, Estimating, Project Management, Job Costing all in one. We prefer to train people on one software rather than several. When everyone is using the same program it's easier for team collaboration. It also eliminates the excuse the I …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Monday.com was limited and I noticed myself integrating other programs rather than just using Monday.com I used Zoho at a sales company and it was fine for that. One of my friends uses Zoho for HVAC and I liked the Contractor Foreman interface better.
Chose Contractor Foreman
Based on the on my previous experience Contractor Foreman rates right along side the other cost saving systems I have used. It does not compare well to the higher end systems based on everything else that the more expensive systems can do. I think it is right in line with the …
Chose Contractor Foreman
D-tools has a nicer UI but is very specific to the CI industry. Since we moved into the solar business primarily it no longer met our needs.
Chose Contractor Foreman
Way easier to use and learn for new employees joining the business.
Chose Contractor Foreman
I used Projul and Buildium when I was primarily managing rental properties rather than full home builds. Projul was great for estimating and invoicing, while Buildium served its purpose well at the time. Now, as a small construction company, Contractor Foreman provides …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Had all of the pieces we were looking for in one place. Ease of use between mobile & desktop devices. Competitive price. Additionally, their responsiveness through email has been quick and accommodating. I love
Chose Contractor Foreman
Contractor Foreman offered the most services for the best price. Lots of the other software options I have looked into were missing features such as a mobile app or accounting integrations and some were extremely expensive wanting a percentage of overall revenue.
Chose Contractor Foreman
Contractor Foreman: Much more affordable, making it a better fit for small to mid-sized contractors.
Procore: High cost, often requiring enterprise-level budgets, making it overkill for our 33-person company.
Chose Contractor Foreman
It all comes down to the number of features that Contractor Foreman packs into their software for the price they charge. I think it stacks up against Procore but for a small fraction of the cost. They offer more features geared to the commercial GC then other software …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Contractor Foreman is committed to not only update their software consistently, but they also are committed to adding new features as their clients request them. If there is a feature that they do not have, there probably is a plan to implement it in the near future. Our …
Chose Contractor Foreman
There's just no comparing these two. I'm actually going to suggest we keep CE to my boss, and here's why: Clearestimates is perfect for what I just described. You have a little job that you just BOOM it's done? Put it into Clearestimates. That system does not care at all if you …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Buildertrend, Procore and CoConstruct
Chose Contractor Foreman
Contractor Foreman is much easier to use than the other softwares demo'd. Ultimately we got stuck while exploring other softwares and found them a bit difficult to navigate. Contractor Foreman was also available at a fraction of the cost. While the other big name competitors …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Contractor Foreman has Far better pricing.
Contractor Foreman also offered a pricing guarantee (i am not sure of that is still the case).
There are a few features that the top tier subscriptions of the others offer that Contractor Foreman is lacking: specifically a "selections" …
Chose Contractor Foreman
Pricing is the big one, they both offer similar products, Construction Foreman is affordable and Procore is outrageously expensive.
Chose Contractor Foreman
All of these programs are a good fit for somebody, but what we liked about Contractor Foreman is the ease of use and that they listen to the needs we have and work to add them or fix them. The program can look a little intimidating at first but once you get it setup the way you …
Revit
Chose Revit
Revit is still better for our business.
Chose Revit
Revit is hands on and easy to learn. Very accurate and great for construction documentation. One can create in 2D and have elevations, sections and 3D views ready. So it is very helpful to visualize. Drawback - It is comparatively harder to draw curves and spherical …
Chose Revit
To be perfectly honest, every architectural firm I have ever worked with was also using Revit. Revit (and Autodesk) has a monopoly on the AEC industry, so I didn't choose to use Revit. The industry as a whole made that choice. There is just no competition out there at this …
Chose Revit
Revit has more features in compare to another software like autocad. The more features get you more flexibility in your work and impact your time management. The more you do in less time and the more your quality with this software. So I think Revit is going in a good direction.
Chose Revit
When we talk with different clients, they can't visualize what we want, having Revit with its 3D tools can give a very accurate presentation for the design along with the clash detecting if many disciplines worked together on the same project. Also, it allows for previewing a …
Chose Revit
We have selected this product for trying accuracy on details of structural design. It is all digital and works in a collaborative space.
Chose Revit
Revit is great for documentation. I also use Rhino 3D for rapid prototype scenarios that can be imported in, but in the end everything should be documented in Revit because it really is easy.
Chose Revit
Fabrication is slow and takes more manpower to work because it has more manual work compare to Revit. Fabrication and Revit can be used for the same work but Revit will do it faster and real-time syncing method make it easy to work for multiple people and in Fabrication, areas …
Chose Revit
Revit is very vast. It not only [has a] single discipline but also [has] multiple disciplines in a single software, so it meets all of the requirements and performs tasks with ease. Revit is the best option [that] is more user-friendly with respect to its comparable software. …
Chose Revit
I'd say the advantages on the side of Revit is
  • Huge demand in the market
  • strong development platform (lots of add-ins),
Chose Revit
Autodesk Revit is more user-friendly than the mentioned software and is easy to create a custom family within the software. Multiple users can work at the same time in Revit, as with the other software mentioned, each user has to work on a separate file. Faster workflow and …
Chose Revit
Revit is a more creative tool compared to others software like AutoCAD. More people can work simultaneously on Revit files but in AutoCAD only 1 person can work on 1 file. File management of Revit is good whereas in AutoCAD multiple AutoCAD files are created for the same 1 …
Chose Revit
This is because Revit is easier to work with than AutoCAD and can easily draw a 3D model from Revit. Also, Revit can do more work than AutoCAD.
Chose Revit
Revit is one of the most powerful tools in the Architecture, Engineering and Construction Field. It is outmatched by none. There is definitely a learning curve, and it cannot be picked up by an average employee and learned without formal training. Revit can do more on the …
Chose Revit
Revit is easy to operate and involves various families for different disciplines. It also involves one single model where different users can open, work, and synchronize at the same time, making collaboration easy. Also, users can view other disciplines in the same model making …
Chose Revit
There are really no competitors to Revit for large complex building projects. It is essentially an industry standard, and we would not be able to complete our work or collaborate with our consultants effectively if we did not use Revit. AutoCAD is still used in the office for …
Chose Revit
Revit has more architectural design functions, which work for rendering the structures into a polished style. Sketchup is unlikely to be used for a large structure modeling, more towards the interior design or small model demonstration. Solidworks is a more generalized software …
Chose Revit
Revit, like AutoCAD, is the most straight forward, intuitive of the BIM software available in today's market. It is widely excepted at a norm and is the most universally used in the engineering trades that we work with. As our clients start to demand that their projects are …
Chose Revit
Revit and Sketchup can be complementary products, although many promotional materials for Revit imply that it can replace Sketchup from your workflow. The promise is that you could complete all of your design studies in Revit, and not need to rebuild the geometry in Revit. The …
Chose Revit
AutoCAD was great back in the day but had such a wide range of uses. Revit is based in construction and runs better for that function because of it. If I was to have to switch back to AutoCAD I cannot imagine how much more time I would have to spend in order to produce the …
Chose Revit
Revit is purely an architectural design and drafting tool. It is best used at this current time of its development for visualization purposes. It does have features for documentation purposes for building construction however extracting building data and information is not yet …
Chose Revit
The choice fell on Revit because as an artist, it was important for me to make a 3D design, without delving into the project documentation.
Chose Revit
Revit brings collaboration to projects on a whole other level never seen in AutoCAD. Revit allows not only another live perspective of projects but also a huge advantage in simultaneous user production of drawings.
Chose Revit
AutoCad, MicroStation. These are both good programs but they are limited to two dimensions for the most part and I choose to use Revit for its ease in working in 3D, annotation, and organization. If you are looking to have a consistent good-looking set of drawings in 2D or 3D, …
Features
Contractor ForemanRevit
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.1
Ratings
7% below category average
Revit
6.7
Ratings
13% below category average
Employee demographic data7.50 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Employment history5.60 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Job profiles and administration6.60 Ratings6.30 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.7.80 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Organizational charting7.30 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Organization and location management8.40 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)6.50 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
6.5
Ratings
16% below category average
Revit
7.2
Ratings
6% below category average
Pay calculation6.10 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors6.30 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment4.50 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Benefit plan administration8.00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Direct deposit files8.00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management6.40 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Reimbursement management6.50 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.5
Ratings
4% above category average
Revit
6.6
Ratings
8% below category average
Tracking of all physical assets7.50 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
6.8
Ratings
11% below category average
Revit
8.6
Ratings
12% above category average
Dashboards6.90 Ratings4.40 Ratings
Standard reports6.80 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Custom reports6.70 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Data exportability6.70 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.2
Ratings
5% below category average
Revit
7.3
Ratings
3% below category average
Plan distribution & viewing6.90 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing6.60 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists7.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Photo documentation7.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Jobsite reports7.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Document sharing6.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
RFI tools9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals6.90 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Mobile app6.70 Ratings3.80 Ratings
Submittal design and management6.80 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Checklists7.00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Meeting Minutes8.10 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Specifications7.40 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Change orders7.00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
As-built drawings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Contractor Foreman
7.0
Ratings
13% below category average
Revit
8.2
Ratings
2% above category average
Takeoff tools7.50 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Job costing6.90 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Cost databases6.80 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Cost calculator6.80 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Bid creation6.90 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Contractor ForemanRevit
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Contractor ForemanRevit
Likelihood to Recommend
7.1
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.8
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Contractor ForemanRevit
Likelihood to Recommend
Contractor Foreman has been a great tool for managing a variety of projects, from home remodels to large-scale builds. It works especially well for keeping everything organized in one place, whether it’s estimates, schedules, or job costs.
One scenario where it’s been really useful is in managing multiple jobs at once. With several remodels and new construction projects happening at the same time, having a centralized system to track progress, store documents, and communicate with subcontractors has helped keep everything on schedule. It’s also great for estimating—being able to quickly generate and send professional proposals has made bidding much more efficient.
It’s especially well-suited for projects that require a lot of moving parts, like tracking permits and compliance documents. For larger jobs, like school construction, it helps ensure that all approvals, budgets, and schedules stay on track without getting lost in a mess of paperwork.
Where it’s less ideal is for smaller, one-off jobs where a full project management system might be overkill. If it’s just a quick repair or a simple remodel, sometimes it’s easier to just handle things manually. The mobile app could also be a bit more intuitive for on-site use, especially for field updates and quick changes.
Overall, it’s a strong tool for contractors managing multiple projects, budgets, and teams. It keeps things organized and saves time, especially on jobs that require detailed tracking and coordination.
Read full review
Revit is well suited for creating collaborative projects that are fully integrated into the design and construction document process. We work a lot with engineering firms who also use Revit and the program allows us to fully integrate and coordinate our models together to make sure that everything is correct. I can see where my electrical engineer has placed lighting into the model and same with my mechanical engineer and their HVAC equipment
Read full review
Pros
  • The service is top notch. You would be hard pressed to find other options with this kind of service.
  • The ability to have your project flow through the modules makes it a breeze to use.
  • Being able to track time as well is a key feature.
Read full review
  • Revit has the capability to design a wide range of unique details, which allows us to model exactly what is going to be built.
  • This program is compatible with several BIM programs, allowing coordination with trades that may not be using the program.
  • The sheets are easy to set up, and finding contract drawings in a list of sheets is simple.
Read full review
Cons
  • We already heard from CF that they might implement this, but a Gantt chart available while in the estimating tab, before you submit the project
  • If you don't do things juuuusssst so, sometimes the system doesn't update or rejects what you're doing. It can be picky.
  • You have to constantly refresh using their provided button. Fixes a lot of issues and becomes second nature, but a little annoying at first.
Read full review
  • Revit is a very complex application with lots features. Autodesk the makers of Revit should simplify these tools to make it easier for the end user to learn & apply.
  • Revit is missing some key functionality in the area of being able to duplicate drawings on the sheet level. Though there are macros offered by third parties, this should be really built-in to the product.
  • Revit does not support the very popular PDF format. So currently there is no option to attach or link a PDF file into Revit.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Eliminated the need for our team to log into multiple systems to do their jobs which aligns to our Lean approach
Read full review
We will almost certainly be renewing all of our current seats of Revit and will likely be adding seats as we look to get more and more of our staff trained and using Revit. The software is starting to become the standard for our projects as we move forward as more and more of our clients are requesting or accepting use of it
Read full review
Usability
Mostly great, especially for the price. The features appear to have definitely been designed by a team with a depth of construction specific experience. I also highly rate the usability because of the vast vast amount of customizability inherent in the system. It appears that almost all forms and features are customabizable on the company level and even specific to different individual users.
Read full review
It is a professional environment, but far from easy and overly complex in many places. The system is often too deep in settings and overrides (see Visibility/Graphics in combination with linked files, filters, color overrides and view templates). I don't really like the dialog-in-dialog interface and its spartan looks. But it works well overall if you know what you are doing.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Availability was good, FUNCTIONAL availability was more spotty
Read full review
Revit seems to always be available when I need it. I have not experiences an outage. There are occasions where we need our internal IT department to trouble shoot a file on our Revit dedicated server and that sometimes causes a delay however that is not a software access issue
Read full review
Performance
Many times we had issues that turned out to be errors and bugs. At first, we would be told forcefully that there were no bugs, then we would document them, and we would get an acknowledgement but no apology for essentially either gaslighting us or being ignorant of their system
Read full review
Revit is a fairly graphics heavy piece of software. It is powerful in its capabilities but as a result it takes a lot of the graphics card, the memory, etc. For all that it can do and the specs of my computer I find it pretty good from a performance standpoint
Read full review
Support Rating
Absolutely top notch! They were always there to help and immediately. Very happy with the communication they provided and the knowledge they had of their product. I would venture to say that they are one of the best in terms of support in their space.
Read full review
Autodesk has always had a good support system in place. There is a massive user base for Revit, and there are thousands of forum threads and other discussions online about any and every problem that you could ever run into. For being such a large program with so many different options, there aren't many roadblocks or pitfalls that users can fall into.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
The training was Revit Essentials and it was very beneficial. I would say that it is best to get the training right before you know you will be using Revit as learning the basis then applying what you learned immediately is the most effective and best value for your money.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
The online training is hit or miss. I feel that its better to be live to be able to pace and ask questions to a live person as you are learning hwo to do things. Its not natural to learn Revit especially if you know AutoCAD so my suggestion is the live training
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Implementation was moderately difficult, it's the functionality and execution that are seriously lacking
Read full review
Implementing Revit as your main drafting software (i.e. moving to BIM from CAD) may be a tough decision if you have learned drafting. It is a different way to approach and think about developing a project. However, if you are able to adapt to a new way of thinking and get used to it by working through a few projects than it is as efficient as CAD in most areas in general and will also be both better/worse in some areas
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I used Projul and Buildium when I was primarily managing rental properties rather than full home builds. Projul was great for estimating and invoicing, while Buildium served its purpose well at the time. Now, as a small construction company, Contractor Foreman provides everything we need in one platform, making project management much more efficient.
Read full review
Revit is specifically for the design and documentation of buildings. As Revit's predecessor, AutoCAD has similar functionality for creating construction documents but Revit has the advantage of speed and simultaneously creating a 3D model when drawing walls, rooms, and floors which allows for the creation of 3D views and sections later with less effort. SketchUp can also be used for designing buildings but Revit allows for more specificity earlier in the process as opposed to SketchUp's general massing
Read full review
Scalability
We had just 2 users
Read full review
While I am not directly involved with the deployment of Revit, it seems that our internal IT department has appreciated the ability to increase or decrease the number of seats. I have never had an issue with the deployment if and when needed, especially regarding the availability of a set
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Cost Savings. Integration with QuickBooks and Bills improved financial control. 0-15% cost savings per project.
  • Time Savings: Streamlined project management led to a 20-30% reduction in administrative time, boosting on-site productivity, and with project tracking a 15-20% reduction in project delays.
  • Enhanced Collaboration: Centralized documentation and real-time updates improved team communication, increasing collaboration by 5-10%.
  • Overall, CF has provided a 10-15% return on investment annually through increased efficiency and cost control.
Read full review
  • Revit is included in our AEC Collection. I find the cost of my suite affordable for what I am getting. The true cost of Revit is not found in the license cost, but in the training, SOPs and content management. We get our ROI from flushing out design errors/omissions which can add up to a large number. One issue can easily cost the project 10-100k depending on the issue. I see no reason anyone would find it challenging to get ROI from integrating 3d modeling in your business development.
  • Revit really is the foundation of content creation. If we didnt use Revit, it would be hard to claim we have a functioning BIM/VDC department. I would question any AEC professional that claims they can perform VDC and does not know how to use Revit.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Contractor Foreman Screenshots

Screenshot of The client portal that lets customers to stay in the loop and know what is going on during all phases of the project.Screenshot of The custom dashboard which allows users to see the data that matters most to them.Screenshot of Stats that keep users informed to help them make use of data.Screenshot of The lead manager, that helps close deals without letting leads fall through the cracks.Screenshot of the Files & Photos screen, where making up plans can be done with Contractor Foreman.Screenshot of Time Cards, that display who is where and what they are doing.