Control-M vs. ignio AIOps

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Control-M
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Control-M from BMC is a platform for integrating, automating, and orchestrating application and data workflows in production across complex hybrid technology ecosystems. It provides deep operational capabilities, delivering speed, scale, security, and governance.
$29,000
per year
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
ignio AIOps, from Digitate in Santa Clara, is a solution designed to improve business agility by creating a unified view of the IT estate, connecting business functions to applications and infrastructure. This is combined with behavior profile of systems and applications that is continuously learnt using this blueprint. ignio aims to improve the transparency of complex Enterprise IT landscapes.N/A
Pricing
Control-Mignio AIOps
Editions & Modules
On-Premise
Contact Sales
SaaS
Starting at $29,000
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Control-Mignio AIOps
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Control-Mignio AIOps
Considered Both Products
Control-M
Chose Control-M
Because of some of the best features the Control-M provides which includes but not limited to- Automation workload processing, manager file transfer, data pipelines, integrations, hybrid and multi cloud workflow.
Chose Control-M
AutoSys Workload Automation, HCL Workload Automation and Apache Airflow
Chose Control-M
Control-M allows you to run several types of batch jobs. For this case, SAP jobs which are not available to JAMS.
Chose Control-M
Broadcom Automic Automation and IBM Workload Automation
Chose Control-M
We would still use Control-M as overall orchestrator to manage the workflows created in these other products. We do not consider them as a replacement for Control-M.
Chose Control-M
Both cover the functionalities that we require. We are with CtrlM because it is a solution that other business units of the organization have.
Chose Control-M
Control-M is more robust and easier to use
Chose Control-M
Control-M is very easy to use and it is easy to visually see how tasks are performing. Having the logs in one place when a task fails makes troubleshooting easier.
Chose Control-M
Control-M has proven to be much more reliable and not prone to crashes like UC4 had. It’s also more versatile since we can build almost anything we may need with the application integrator.
Chose Control-M
We have been using Control-M for almost 20 years and our teams are already trained to use it. Other tools are not as robust and resilient as Control-M. Control-M's graphical interface is very easy to use.
Chose Control-M
Control-M has a lot more features within it. Also, the structure is more visual than active batch and it's easier to navigate around
Chose Control-M
Control-M by far is the leader in this industry. The ease of use of the product and the ability to get others up to speed on using the product because of this is great.
Chose Control-M
Control-M is better then AutoSys in all aspects, from managing the solution to using it to basic and advanced functionality.
Chose Control-M
We still use Power Automate but for different scenarios where job dependency is not required.
ignio AIOps
Chose ignio AIOps
We generally use Ignio AIOps. It is flexible and works well for AIOPS.
Features
Control-Mignio AIOps
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
Control-M
8.7
Ratings
5% above category average
ignio AIOps
-
Ratings
Multi-platform scheduling9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Central monitoring9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Logging8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Application integration8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Control-Mignio AIOps
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.6 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
Sumo Logic
Sumo Logic
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Control-Mignio AIOps
Likelihood to Recommend
9.3
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.6
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.9
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.8
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.6
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Online Training
9.2
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.5
(0 ratings)
9.6
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.4
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.6
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.4
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.4
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Control-Mignio AIOps
Likelihood to Recommend
Scenarios where it's well suited are where you're running jobs across platforms. We have processes on our mainframe that have to complete our daily batch processing and the controlling handles the scheduling of the daily batch processing. Then once that's done, it moves into executing stuff on servers like SQL loads and transferring files to load into SQL and then also running reporting on the SQL servers when the data's been loaded and is available. It makes for a really smooth transition of the overnight processing the bank has to go through. That's our main function that we use it for currently. It handles it very well.
Read full review
-Autonomous alert and incident management related to infrastructure, NW, and applications. -Excellent fit to handle CPU, memory, and disk space alert management - proactive and predictive. -Several automation features (self-healing) - CPU/Memory modifications; disk extensions; patch management -Provisioning of user access and infrastructure servers, etc.
Read full review
Pros
  • Workload change manager is one of our favorite features of this product. It enforces standards, which is a huge benefit. Users don't just make crazy changes that cause issues with other jobs. It does great promotions from one environment to another, transforming all the data to match the next environment.
Read full review
  • ignio handles 100+ use cases covering the entire organization including applications and infrastructure.
  • Centralize the dashboard to view and executed the health of systems in our environment.
  • It handles CA services desk Incidents and requests. Using automated tools with power shell scripts.
  • ignio event management helps the organization to manage the alerts well and make an informed decision.
Read full review
Cons
  • Certificate on all levels: Each agent uses different keystrokes for different functions, such as AI, web service calls, and MFT.
  • It's really hard to manage these keystrokes.
  • Trust stores, in case control-m, act as servers; it should be simple to implement certificates from a corporate CA.
  • Some functions must be performed in the fat client, while others can only be performed through the web interface. This should be streamlined as soon as possible.
Read full review
  • There is a lot more the desktop tool can do. For example, we need to apply an upgrade to get the tool to talk to our infrastructure while employees are working from home. The tool was initially installed with the assumption that the desktops would be in UserLand. Instead after COVID-19 the desktop/laptops have been used for over a year on people's home networks. As of right now, we have to sync when the devices are connected to VPN. Moving forward with the upgrade, we will be getting this data over TLS when they are connected to the untrusted networks.
  • The concept of ignio AlOps requires OCM efforts within most operational teams. This isn't necessarily the fault of the tool itself, but when implementing ignio, or any AIOps tool, the team will get a lot of pushback as an outside team is centralizing the operational improvements. The tool should have a centralized intake process that will allow the collection, ranking, and management of automation opportunities. ignio AlOps should then simulate the proposed efficiencies from implementing something within the backlog. Right now a lot of local teams are having a hard time getting on the same page as the enterprise teams, and a common methodology for prioritizing (even if overly simplistic) would go a long way to enterprise planning.
  • These tools are very new and things get added to them all the time. There should be a way for the product's stakeholders and process owners to understand the additional value ignio AlOps is gaining over time.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Control-M integrates with DevOps toolchains to automate the deployment of applications and updates. It supports Jobs-as-Code, allowing developers to define workflows programmatically, which accelerates development cycles and improves deployment consistency1.These use cases highlight how Control-M can streamline operations, enhance efficiency, and support critical business functions across various domains.
Read full review
It is a very good product and it helps our organization.
Read full review
Usability
Since it is GUI-based, it is not hard to use, although all new programs have a learning curve. The color scheme is easy to use to find the status of different Batch jobs. The check-in and check-out feature of job definitions is easy to use and avoids problems with users trying to use the same resource at the same time.
Read full review
ignio AIOps version upgrades were a heavy lift. Having to learn a new language versus an industry standard language took time. More consideration on overall internal long-term support needs to be determined.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Secondary Instances: Control-M supports the installation of a secondary instance of the entire Control-M environment, Control-M/EM, or Control-M/Server.Automatic & Manual Failover: In case of a failure on the primary host, Control-M can automatically failover to the secondary host if using Oracle or MSSQL databases. Manual failover is also an option, enabling a controlled switch during planned maintenance.Fallback: After resolving the issue on the primary host, you can easily fall back to it, or even designate the secondary host as the new primary. Database Replication: For high availability, Control-M leverages database replication from the primary site to a disaster recovery site. While replication is essential, its implementation and maintenance are the user's responsibility.
Read full review
It was up than Dynatrace
Read full review
Performance
good page load times, efficient report completion, and minimal impact on integrated systems. Specifically, the well-designed GUI contributes to a positive user experience, and the platform's ability to automate various stages of the workflow, including Big Data processes, is highlighted as a key strength. Fast Page Loads: Control-M is reported to have a responsive user interface with fast page load times, allowing users to quickly navigate and manage their workflows
Read full review
Looks good at the moment
Read full review
Support Rating
He contactado varias veces con el soporte de BMC y ha sido bastante bueno, siempre han sabido darme una solución a lo que he pedido. Esta vez quiero hacer alguna nueva pregunta, pero no se si se me podrá contestar, ya que es algo que tal vez fuera de otro rango y no pertenezca a ellos.
Read full review
We have built a healthy relationship with the vendor support team throughout the implementation phase, all incidents raised were resolved within the SLA without a fail
Read full review
In-Person Training
Very knowledgeable instructors provide a hands-on, collaborative learning experience and can interact directly with instructors to develop our Control-M skills. This format allows for immediate feedback, in-depth discussions, and tailored guidance, leading to a deeper understanding of Control-M concepts and practical application. Face-to-face interaction fosters higher engagement and a more dynamic learning environment.
Read full review
Implementation team has provided necessary training & enablement.
Read full review
Online Training
Simple and easy to use web based, well paced. Available any time. All online courses are simple and easy to access and use. Very practical everyday use scenarios and solutions. Incorporates software simulations, learning games, and built-in assessments to enhance comprehension and engagement. Online subscriptions are regularly updated with the latest product information, ensuring users have access to the most current knowledge.
Read full review
Online training materials are shared by the implementation team and it was good.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
As HA we have depend on the external DB, why don't we have HA feasibility with embedded DB. As with external DB, there are performance issues and fine tuning the DB. As if its embedded DB, Control-M it self take care of the functionality.
Read full review
I am happy with the way team has implemented and shared the product for our organization. However, would like to see it get extended to the other line of business too.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I met him as a Control-M consultant, performing migrations from CA to BMC. I knew the product and interface were not as friendly or intuitive as Control-M's and could not integrate new technologies and external applications. One of CA's excellent capabilities was the ability to incorporate executions with Java Scripting to obtain variable values ​​or to order processes natively in the application using its utilities.
Read full review
We generally use Ignio AIOps. It is flexible and works well for AIOPS.
Read full review
Scalability
awesome product.Control-M delivers advanced operational capabilities easily consumed by Dev, Ops, data teams, and lines of business.Control-M Workflow InsightsApplication and data workflow observability: Increased confidence that SLAs are being met for Control-M users and IT leadersComprehensive control and management capabilities: Enhanced dashboards and reporting with constant telemetry and intelligent analysis on executing workflowsSelf-service visibility: In-depth reporting to help teams work autonomously
Read full review
Quite Scalable!
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Control-M has improved service delivery times, reliability and quality of batch processing.
  • It has simplified the management of the operation and the use of the alert system has made it possible to act in a coordinated and efficient manner to solve problems.
  • The implementation of policies has made it possible to make greater use of Control-M and thus reduce development costs that are generated unnecessarily when the potential of the system is not considered.
Read full review
  • ignio has had a positive impact on our organization by saving 7,000+ hours within Operations and automatically resolving 84% of our service requests.
  • ignio has increased our alert coverage by over 60%.
Read full review
ScreenShots