Convert Experiences vs. Insiteful

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Convert Experiences is an experimentation platform that offers features and support to run A/B tests across multiple growth channels. Its enterprise-ready advanced features include full stack experimentation, multi-page testing, post-segmentation, sequential testing, targeting with 40+ filters, triggering tests based on data in other apps (data sources), dynamic triggers, complex goal tracking, and a secure API. It includes 90+ out-of-the box integrations in a…
$299
per month 100k tested users per month
Insiteful
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
A form abandonment software used to capture partial entries and recover missed leads. Users can create hands-free workflows to automagically re-engage and convert warm leads with the Insiteful app for Zapier.N/A
Pricing
Convert ExperiencesInsiteful
Editions & Modules
Growth
$299
per month 100k tested users per month
Pro
$5988
per year 3M tested users available upfront
Enterprise
Pricing available on request
From 1M tested users/mo (billed annually)
Enterprise
Pricing available on request
From 1M tested users/mo (billed annually)
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Convert ExperiencesInsiteful
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details1. Annual contract or monthly payments available (40% discount for annual pricing). 2. Pricing is not feature dependent. Some features like integrations, goals, Live Logs are necessary to test successfully. This is why Convert caps by unique tested users - basically visitors who have been bucketed to see a variation and are unique to that variation. As a result the app tested users are always </= the site's net traffic.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Convert ExperiencesInsiteful
Considered Both Products
Convert Experiences
Chose Convert Experiences
Three words: value for money. In a due diligence comparison, Convert Experiences came up more than twice less expensive than the nearest competitor, while offering more product features, better performance and a quick response time with support/sales agents that actually …
Chose Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences sits in a niche of great products, against which it competes very well and remains held in high regard as it achieves pretty much everything that the bigger platforms put on the table but in a more cost-effective model. The reason we initially chose …
Chose Convert Experiences
Convert has the best JS code editor for advanced users (and developers). It doesn't have as great integration with GA as Google Optimize, but it also doesn't have a limit to 5 tests at one time. It's also much easier to use than Optimizely.
Chose Convert Experiences
Although not as robust as Adobe Target, Convert fills the niche with solid functionality at a great price. Comparable to Optimizely and far above Google Optimize.
Chose Convert Experiences
Although VWO is slightly cheaper it flickers quite a bit, hence why I originally looked into alternative software to use for A/B testing. VWO also has other features that could be useful, but they can be found in tools you may already be using, like Hotjar. Also, their support …
Chose Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences has a better UI, better reporting and is a faster platform.
Chose Convert Experiences
Convert was selected based on price point, feature set, and UI/UX. All three are very friendly to new testers and small to mid-market size companies. Their UI and tool workflow is the best out of all of the non-enterprise solutions that I have tried. There is some small room …
Chose Convert Experiences
There were a number of other tools I used. Specifically though: they expose the DMP features that some other companies price into oblivion and enterprise levels (if the other tools have them at all!)

I feel like I've gushed a lot about the DMP and power user features of Convert …
Chose Convert Experiences
Convert is better vs. Optimizely and VWO for the following reasons:
  • Better pricing
  • Faster App - easier and quicker to create tests, less clunky but just as powerful as the others
Chose Convert Experiences
The biggest point for Convert Experiences is definitely the price and the completeness of their packages. Their Magento plugin makes it great for running tests on ecommerce stores. One thing that's missing for me is deeper insights into revenue (something optimizely does …
Chose Convert Experiences
Convert works similar to Optimizely, but at a more competitive rate.
Chose Convert Experiences
Visual Website Optimizer's feature set is not as well suited to advanced experiments (it doesn't seem to allow direct editing of variation code). Optimizely is expensive and their agency plan requires a 12 month minimum contract. Support is not as great. Optimizely also does …
Chose Convert Experiences
While Optimizely is an amazing A/B testing tool, Convert has almost the exact same offerings but at a much lower cost. The customer and technical support are excellent as well, and Dennis's insights and strategy calls are very helpful.
Chose Convert Experiences
Visual Website Optimizer costs too much and misses a lot of transactions due to third-party cookies. Optimizely flat out refused to support Shopify. They withdrew their app from the marketplace in 2014.
Insiteful

No answer on this topic

Features
Convert ExperiencesInsiteful
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Convert Experiences
9.4
Ratings
14% above category average
Insiteful
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Split URL testing10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multivariate testing9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app testing9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Test significance10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced code editor9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Page surveys9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Visitor recordings9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Preview mode10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Test duration calculator7.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Client-side tests10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Server-side tests8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Convert Experiences
9.9
Ratings
15% above category average
Insiteful
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Website personalization9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Convert Experiences
9.4
Ratings
11% above category average
Insiteful
-
Ratings
Heatmap tool9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Click analytics10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Scroll maps9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Form fill analysis9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Conversion tracking9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Goal tracking9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Test reporting9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Results segmentation9.80 Ratings00 Ratings
CSV export9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Convert ExperiencesInsiteful
Small Businesses
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Score 7.3 out of 10
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
Contentsquare
Contentsquare
Score 7.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
Contentsquare
Contentsquare
Score 7.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Convert ExperiencesInsiteful
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Convert ExperiencesInsiteful
Likelihood to Recommend
Definitely well suited for budget conscious companies that want a solid array of functionality but without having to pay an exorbitant amount. Great for marketing and analytics team members that need the ability to get in and set up tests w/o dev assistance. But, functionality is there for developers to get in and set up more complicated tests.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • The platform is good value for money, comparing its features and prices to some of the bigger players.
  • The tool is very flexible and can be used for simpler tests right through to much more challenging and rewarding testing but does require a more thorough knowledge of the platform.
  • Their support team is always available and always responsive, not resting until resolutions are met.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • The only thing I'm really missing is segmentation during or after testing of the results by device, new users etc., within the results page. Targeting of users based on segments is obviously possible.
  • There are a few inconsistencies in their user interface that I would have liked to see differently. This could be personal taste though.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
Couldn't live without this, no other tool does precisely what we need them to do
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
To use the platform in the context of developing enhanced tests that stretch the platform there is as with most things a learning curve. However, if you're a casual user or have standard experiments that you wish to run you would be easily able to hit the ground running.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I use support only in very emergency cases. The support hasn't been very helpful and suggests the problem is on my site
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Convert was selected based on price point, feature set, and UI/UX. All three are very friendly to new testers and small to mid-market size companies. Their UI and tool workflow is the best out of all of the non-enterprise solutions that I have tried. There is some small room for improvement, but that only really affects power users or tests that require significant coding/development work to execute.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Using Convert has allowed us to make quick decisions on site edits and price changes. Seeing and sharing quick results makes our operations much more profitable.
  • Connecting the tests with Shopify has produced very valuable and timely results that we can act upon as soon as we see statistically significant results.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Convert Experiences Screenshots

Screenshot of the conditions that can be stacked to build complex goals that can track (almost) any visitor action to determine the test outcome.Screenshot of granular targeting so only the right people view variations. 40+ conditions included.Screenshot of the API that brings Convert's capabilities to a testing ecosystem.Screenshot of experiment reports that can be shared with stakeholders and on social media.Screenshot of several advanced test types that are available, including multipage (funnel) experiments.Screenshot of full-stack experimentation that can be used to run tests anywhere that Convert code can be deployed.