Corcentric Source-to-Pay Platform vs. MineralTree

It is well suited for applications which has centralized data system. For desperate databases, big performance hit could be unavoidable.Web based Sales solutions which could be easily unplugged from big infrastructure and to be used in field with no need of network connectivity or front office availability would be ideal candidates for CPQ

It's well suited if you would like to negotiate a good price and you are a small company needing an AP solution. However, I would say stick to Bill.com if you want a solution you can grow with.

Incentivized

• Pricing engine is a big plus in CPQ.
• The flex modeling supported in CPQ increases the model efficiency by eliminating unwanted options
• Integrating external tools into selectica by exporting out xmls make it easier

• Great Customer Service. Whenever there is an issue they are very responsive in helping with the issue.
• At the time it was cheaper than Bill.com for most of the same functionality.
• Integrated with QuickBooks relatively well.

Incentivized

• Model builder's sluggishness.

• We had some improvements that wanted to be made but so far over the 2 years with them they have made the updates we wanted.

Incentivized

Unless CPQ is available on cloud or available as platform as service, I am less likely to consider it again. The initial cost involved is high and also the time required for that.

I used Saleslogix.

At the time, we had to records transaction twice when we had Bill.com, MineralTree solved that problem.

Incentivized

• yes, faster lead conversion as Field sales team rely less on main office
• reduced sales cycle.
• Reduced Sales overheads, deal closure can happen at client location.

• Cost of AP.
• AmEx integration will allow us to accrue points on our card.

Incentivized