TrustRadius

Ericom Security by Cradlepoint vs. Netskope Private Access

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Ericom Security by Cradlepoint
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
Ericom Security and Cradlepoint, part of Ericsson, are expanding the scope and impact of zero trust security services to protect organizations from advanced threats. Ericom’s flagship Security Service Edge (SSE) cloud platform leverages remote browser isolation, application isolation, microsegmentation, and virtualization technologies.N/A
Netskope Private Access
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Netskope Private Access is a zero trust access solution, that allows users to provide remote access to applications running in the public cloud and private data center environments, and avoid the need for remote users to use a VPN through the corporate network to gain access to private applications.N/A
Pricing
Ericom Security by CradlepointNetskope Private Access
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ericom Security by CradlepointNetskope Private Access
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Ericom Security by CradlepointNetskope Private Access
Considered Both Products
Ericom Security by Cradlepoint

No answer on this topic

Netskope Private Access
AK
Ankit Kumar
Technical Support Engineer
Chose Netskope Private Access
In comparison to Zscaler private access, Netskope Private Access provides more features and stability to the user environment. Netskope private access improves user experience in comparison to Zscaler private access. Cost-wise, Zscaler is cheaper than Netskope private access. …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Netskope Private Access
It is much more intuitive and you can perform more functionalities
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Netskope Private Access
Netskope Private Access is a much more intuitive as a VPN solution than Sonicwall, that in our experience needs more maintenance and is more prone to fail.
When used as a proxy solution is much more complete than the Layer 7 filters of the Fortigate and allows for a much more …
Features
Ericom Security by CradlepointNetskope Private Access
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Ericom Security by Cradlepoint
-
Ratings
Netskope Private Access
10.0
Ratings
12% above category average
Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Ericom Security by Cradlepoint
-
Ratings
Netskope Private Access
9.0
Ratings
5% below category average
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Ericom Security by Cradlepoint
-
Ratings
Netskope Private Access
9.4
Ratings
6% above category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Product A and Product B
Ericom Security by Cradlepoint
-
Ratings
Netskope Private Access
8.6
Ratings
8% below category average
Continuous Verification00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Network Flow Control00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Network Traffic Analysis00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Segmentation Leveraging00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Admin Access Control00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Network Data Encryption00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Ericom Security by CradlepointNetskope Private Access
Small Businesses
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.5 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.9 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.9 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Ericom Security by CradlepointNetskope Private Access
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Ericom Security by CradlepointNetskope Private Access
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
I think it´s a very good tool, it´s usage it´s very intuitive and the UI is very clean and responsive. When used as a remote access tool, we have it integrated with azure and the user login is done through the Microsoft account, so we have insight of the location logins centralized in Defender 365 and it´s very easy to use for the end user
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Proxy
  • Remote Access
  • DLP
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Publisher upgrade should be pre intimidated.
  • NPA user interface can be more simplified.
  • Backend changes should be notified.
AK
Ankit Kumar
Technical Support Engineer
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We are delighted with everything they are adding and how the product is growing.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
As I said before, I find it´s UI very intuitive and it´s very easy to use and configure, everything is where it should be and allows for a good workflow. For the end user it´s only a login page that pops out automatically and close itself once it´s authenticated so it stay out of the way of the user.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
The support is good, but the problem is that even if you indicate that you prefer support in Spanish, the application indicates that it is available. I have never had a technician who spoke to me in Spanish.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
The process was smooth and well managed.
There was probably good technical coordination and support.
There were only minor details that could be improved.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
In comparison to Zscaler Private Access, Netskope Private Access provides more features and stability to the user environment. Netskope private access improves user experience in comparison to Zscaler Private Access. Cost-wise, Zscaler is cheaper than Netskope private access. Netskope Private Access works comparatively better than Zscaler Private Access in a hybrid environment.
AK
Ankit Kumar
Technical Support Engineer
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Re-authentication improves the security.
  • Application access is more stable.
  • Due to frequent publisher upgrade user unable to connect the application.
AK
Ankit Kumar
Technical Support Engineer
Read full review
ScreenShots