Chose JMP
Much better than Excel for deep data dives, but also much steeper learning curve. And the cost is significantly higher - Excel is provided by default, but we have to request a JMP license each year.
Cribl Search vs. JMP
Cribl Search vs. JMP
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Cribl Search | N/A | Cribl Search turns the traditional search process on its head, allowing users to search data in place. Data does not need to be collected and moved to storage before being examined, now administrators can search data at the edge, moving through an observability pipeline, stored in a data lake, or even stored in their existing solutions like TSDBs or log stores. | N/A | |
 JMP | N/A | JMP® is statistical analysis software with capabilities that span from data access to advanced statistical techniques, with click of a button sharing. The software is interactive and visual, and statistically deep enough to allow users to see and explore data. | $1,320 per year per user |
| Cribl Search | JMP | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | Bulk discounts available. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cribl Search | JMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Cribl Search No answer on this topic |  JMP  Madalyn Lynch Grant Proposal Specialist Chose JMP I learned Statistical Analysis in JMP and am therefore not overly familiar with SAS.  Akshaya Bhardwaj Consultant Chose JMP We just needed to get the output that contains the statistical output, graphs but no programming.  Shelby Bowden Graduate Research Assistant Chose JMP Compared to other, similar programs, JMP is outstanding in ease of use and ability to be used by almost anyone across an organization. It is more fluid, user friendly, and, most importantly, requires no coding experience. The only two areas where it is not as good as …  Thibaut Angevin Senior Scientist Chose JMP JMP is more user-friendly, in my opinion, as it doesn't require any coding or searching for hours into cryptic folders for the analysis you want to perform. It is also very good for recording large data sets. Moreover, it is compatible with Microsoft Excel.  Gabriel Chiararia Marketing Analytics Consultant Chose JMP For me, JMP is the best and easy way to run regressions. I wouldn't use it for other more advanced models. I decided to use it because we got it for free since we are technically an academic institution.  Ruth Wirawan Module & Technology Reliability Engineer Chose JMP I choose JMP because I can accomplish various analyses in one place (no need to move my data around). JMP also can handle huge data sets.  Michael Morris Data Analyst Chose JMP I much prefer the ability to code my programs which is the main method used in both SAS and R. These software choices allow for quicker, more efficient, and more advanced analysis techniques. The one area that JMP is above these is in graphics and visual displays of data. JMP …  Camilo Silva Quality and Reliability Engineering Intern, Manufacturing, Intel Chose JMP Well, JMP is excellent for statistical analysis. So, this product it is well used for statistical analysis and data analytics.  Jaimin Patel Bioinformatician Chose JMP JMP is fast and powerful but little costly than others. But good return for money.  Adam Smith Marketing Analyst Chose JMP I heard good things from colleagues who have used JMP. We did not get too far down the SPSS route before we decided to go with JMP because of price and perceived benefit from my colleague's advice.  Wayne Levin President Chose JMP JMP simply excels against its competitors and the best way we know that is from our clients who have switched from other products. They recognize that their analytical capabilities are much higher with JMP then with whatever tools they used in the past. The ability to integrate …  Eric Burton Continuous improvement Manager Chose JMP JMP is better with visual data representation, and as a general statistics exploration package. Technical needs like Design of Experiments are just easier to do in JMP |
| Cribl Search | JMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses |  Supermetrics Score 10.0 out of 10 |  IBM SPSS Statistics Score 7.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Supermetrics Score 10.0 out of 10 |  Alteryx Platform Score 8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises |  Dataiku Score 7.6 out of 10 | Alteryx Platform Score 8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cribl Search | JMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (0 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (0 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (0 ratings) |
| Availability | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (0 ratings) |
| Performance | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (0 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.2 (0 ratings) |
| Online Training | - (0 ratings) | 7.9 (0 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.6 (0 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (0 ratings) |
| Cribl Search | JMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
Wayne Levin President |
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
Akshaya Bhardwaj Consultant |
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
Eric Burton Continuous improvement Manager |
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Online Training | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | JMP Screenshots    |