Cube vs. IBM Planning Analytics

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cube
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Cube is a financial planning & analysis (FP&A) platform that aims to enable finance teams to be more strategic and positively contribute to company growth activities by spending less time on manual, repetitive task, from Cube Planning headquartered in New York.N/A
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM Planning Analytics, powered by IBM TM1®, is an integrated planning solution designed to promote collaboration across the organization and help keep pace with the speed of modern business. With its calculation engine, this enterprise performance management solution is designed to help users move beyond the limits of spreadsheets, automating the planning process to drive faster, more accurate results. Use it to unify data sources into one single repository, enabling users to build…
$825
per month 5 users
Pricing
CubeIBM Planning Analytics
Editions & Modules
Enterprise
Contact us
Essentials
$825
per month 5 users
Standard
$1,650
per month 10 users
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CubeIBM Planning Analytics
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CubeIBM Planning Analytics
Considered Both Products
Cube
Chose Cube
Cube lacks a lot of the forecasting and planning capabilities of other FP&A tools in the market, but it excels at providing flexibility in aggregating data from multiple places into a single source of truth and then building reports driven off of that data. Cube is very …
Chose Cube
Prefer Cube but mainly due to my new company being early stage start up and moving away from excel was not the answer
Chose Cube
Cube has an easier implementation and functionality is appropriate, quick-to-learn and a perfect match for an organisation of our scale and growth. There is less flexibility in the reporting & formatting in-built in Cube, and it's a far way off the in-built modelling …
Chose Cube
We needed something that was quick to implement, easy to use, and had a small learning curve. Cube has delivered.
Chose Cube
Cube's ability to create custom reports easily on the fly, fully excel based, and simple to use
Chose Cube
Cube was the most flexible while still doing everything we need it to do. Because it is a spreadsheet native platform we could quickly and easily integrate it into the processes we already had. While at the same time learning how Cube worked so that we could fully leverage its …
Chose Cube
Cube support team is much more willing to help. Cube product team is adding new features at a faster pace. Cube is more functional within excel. Cube has better version control and general ledger organization. Cube customer service is incredibly helpful and their team is full …
Chose Cube
Cube was chosen because of its price, customer support and ease to integrate and learn. my team learned it pretty fast and their customer support team consists of ex-fpa folks so they know the problems that the users deal with on a day to day. they gave us a good plan to …
Chose Cube
Cube was just a lot easier to use than Vena. We took some time to look at Vena as well and while their product was impressive, our organization was not yet there. We needed something we could implement quickly, and in today's day and age I think that is a very important quality …
Chose Cube
Cube is a much simpler and easier to use platform compared to its competitors. The setup was extremely easy, and required almost no help from IT. The big standout difference was the cube support team though. They were available from start to finish when implementing the …
Chose Cube
Causal is a much more sophisticated product, but would require that we completely switch away from all of our current models and using google sheets. Cube allowed us to continue operating as is, but with a quicker data connection.
Chose Cube
Workday Adaptive Planning was too cumbersome to implement. It was expected to take 6 months to implement it + teething issues. This would be after you know exactly what you want.
With our business that is going through significant growth year on year and things rapidly changing, …
Chose Cube
90% of what Hyperion offered Cube offers. Cube is missing the drill down feature which I believe is its biggest flaw. If you have revenue you cant double click on revenue and have it blow out all the revenue accounts at the lowest level. For companies that have hundreds …
Chose Cube
Cube Planning's ability to integrate with multiple softwares as well as excel and sheets really set it apart from the competition.
Chose Cube
I guess Oracle PBCS is more suitable for a larger organization. Thus with a small company lie us that require agile planning and reporting, it's not as good of a fit.
Chose Cube
Cube is a much more cost-effective tool that is also much simpler for the business to manage. It does not require an in-house IT team and the admin functionalities are very straightforward.
Chose Cube
We switched to Cube because of its ease of use. Adaptive had way too many moving parts and was too restrictive for what we were trying to achieve. With a small Finance team, it was hard to have multiple people be power users of Adaptive vs Cube which was extremely intuitive for …
Chose Cube
Other products are more robust than Cube Planning (Anaplan, Vena) but the price tag is also way higher. Cube Planning provides us with flexibility, customer support, and overall great value for money
Chose Cube
I was not a part of the search process but I really like using Cube.
Chose Cube
Planful was just a bit too advanced (and costly) for what we needed at this point of our company (much like Adaptive). With those types of platforms, you really do need a consultant to help create the needs specific to your personal business, which ends up adding costs. Causal …
Chose Cube
Cube Planning is more flexible and integrates more easily with Google Sheets and Excel.
Chose Cube
Cube is more affordable than other finance products that are out there. I have also tried Plan Guru, but ran into issues as Plan Guru desktop version was only for PC's and cloud version did not have the same capabilities as the desktop version, so it was a catch-22.
Chose Cube
It was the ease of implementation, the speed to be up and running, the competitive price, and the continued support that sold us on Cube compared to other software.
IBM Planning Analytics
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
It includes Oracle Cloud EPM Planning, Anaplan, and Adaptive Insight before deciding to choose IBM Planning Analytics. We selected Planning Analytics because of its work with complicated and many area models, the capability to work with big amounts of data, and compatibility …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Other options, namely Anaplan, Oracle EPM Cloud, and SAP Analytics Cloud, were also considered. Anaplan's interface lacked analytical depth. For product design metrics, flexibility was not as good in Oracle EPM Cloud. The final choice was moved by the fact that it was driven …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Prior to making the decision to go with IBM Planning Analytics, we had considered such options as Anaplan, Oracle Hyperion, and SAP Analytics Cloud. Despite the collaborative solutions offered by Anaplan and the good connection with other systems by SAP, the superb set of tool …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
In this case, Vena and Planful are considered as other products that can be compared with IBM Planning Analytics, but among them, IBM Planning Analytics is more optimal in terms of user interface and integration. Its preconfigure risk assessment model and its format and …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
This was an older verions that was also very good, but the new IBM Planning Analytics is a far better tool that enables better scenario planning or what-if analysis.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM PA is like having pivot tables on steroids. Possibilities are endless.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Ability to plan more products, locations, customers
Less expensive
Client already had IBM PA for FP&A
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Sandboxing,Integration and Flexibility
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics is easier to use and setup for me. Easier to make reports. Works fast
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Planning Analytics integrates seamlessly with Cognos Analytics to support all aspects of our Financial Reporting against both dimensional (TM1) and relational and ad hoc data sources
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
cost effective solution
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Cognos is a tool that complements IBM Planning Analytics, allowing us to design dashboards and management reports
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Why IBM Planning Analytics when compared to Oracle Hyperion: Better excel integration Less data movement and duplication Better cloud offering More aforeable licensing
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Jedox, Board and SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation)
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics with Watson will be up and running more quickly and be easier to maintain if modeling flexibility, scale, and the ability to plan at greater levels of detail are important requirements.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
I am personally trying to explore the features of SAP analytics cloud in order to find if it's possible to integrate other sources of data and api based integrations, but I'm still on it while using the IBM planning analytics for my project currently. But looking at the intial …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Workday Adaptive Planning
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
I worked with Hyperion a long time ago. It was not a Oracle product yet. One great feature of this solution that was really great at the time, was the modeling process of ir, with a very robust engine for sparse cubes. the performance was excellent at the time. But today I can …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics with Watson is much more flexible and scalable in comparison. IBM PAW is the clear winner for our organization's successful planning and analysis needs.
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Anaplan does not handle sparsity; this is very problematic for large volume data sets (many 0's). There also are limitations to the number of dimensions that can be used in a module. If more dimensions are required, then separate modules need to be built and intertwined. IBM PA …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Because of its ability in planning, budgeting and forecasting or work progress.it has made it easy in driving sales hence profitability and lowering costs,also with ability to forecast the decision making has never been made this easier.
The reasons for selecting are on its …
Chose IBM Planning Analytics
Compare to its competition it has good visual and graphical interface that helps to customized according to user needs. It helps to apply the best possible algorithm according to different model scenario that provides the best possible results. Predictive forecasting and AI …
Features
CubeIBM Planning Analytics
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Cube
7.5
Ratings
2% below category average
IBM Planning Analytics
9.8
Ratings
25% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports8.90 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Customizable dashboards6.40 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.30 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.9
Ratings
9% above category average
IBM Planning Analytics
9.7
Ratings
17% above category average
Drill-down analysis9.60 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Formatting capabilities8.40 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages8.00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration9.80 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.4
Ratings
2% above category average
IBM Planning Analytics
9.5
Ratings
14% above category average
Publish to Web8.20 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.50 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Report Versioning8.50 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling8.40 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.6
Ratings
12% above category average
IBM Planning Analytics
9.3
Ratings
20% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.80 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization9.10 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Predictive Analytics8.80 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining8.80 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Cube
9.3
Ratings
6% above category average
IBM Planning Analytics
9.5
Ratings
9% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)9.20 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.50 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.20 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control9.00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)9.60 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Cube
9.3
Ratings
17% above category average
IBM Planning Analytics
7.6
Ratings
3% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access9.70 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Mobile Application8.90 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile9.20 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Cube
7.5
Ratings
10% below category average
IBM Planning Analytics
9.8
Ratings
17% above category average
Long-term financial planning6.50 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Financial budgeting8.90 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Forecasting7.30 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Scenario modeling6.60 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Management reporting8.30 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.5
Ratings
7% above category average
IBM Planning Analytics
9.8
Ratings
21% above category average
Financial data consolidation8.90 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Journal entries and reports9.60 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Multi-currency management7.10 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations8.50 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Minority Ownership7.00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting10.00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails8.20 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.2
Ratings
1% above category average
IBM Planning Analytics
9.4
Ratings
15% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting8.70 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Management Reporting7.90 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting9.20 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting6.50 Ratings9.70 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing8.90 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.1
Ratings
1% above category average
IBM Planning Analytics
9.5
Ratings
17% above category average
Personalized dashboards8.00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards7.50 Ratings9.80 Ratings
KPIs8.10 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis8.20 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting7.70 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data9.20 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.9
Ratings
6% above category average
IBM Planning Analytics
9.8
Ratings
16% above category average
Flat file integration9.00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Excel data integration9.50 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources8.30 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CubeIBM Planning Analytics
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CubeIBM Planning Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CubeIBM Planning Analytics
Likelihood to Recommend
1) The budget process. In QBO the budgeting capability is non-existant, unless you like manually typing in every scenario and not being able to budget by class. Cube houses my budget/forecast scenarios & lets me view and analyze by my company's preferred data points; department, GL account, vendor, & sales campaign. I'm able to run monthly budget variance reports and plan for the future with ease. 2) We've begun using Cube to help analyze profitablity by sales job. We've never had such easy access to this type of info in the past, so this is a benefit I can directly attribute to Cube. 3) We're beginning now to use an integration with our payroll software to work on headcount planning and payroll analysis.
Read full review
For a CFO or a COO to do budgeting and planning, IBM Planning Analytics would be essential. It is a tool that can take in multiple data sources and showcase them in a multidimensional way. If you are looking just for a BI or reporting tool, Planning Analytics would be considered "overkill".
Read full review
Pros
  • Push/pull information across any Google Sheet or Excel workbook.
  • Budget at a much more granular level (by month by account by the department by vendor).
  • Custom mapping to allow for multiple cuts of the same data.
  • Bulk range selection within a workbook.
Read full review
  • Handle very large data volumes.
  • Scale to a large number of users.
  • Not having to compromise on business complexity.
  • It can be run by business users.
  • Availability of highly qualified consultants to support businesses.
  • REST API allows for an open eco system and a variety of solutions to extend the product.
  • Vast integration possibilities.
  • AI-infused engine with IBM Watson.
Read full review
Cons
  • Limited to 8 top line dimensions. Although you can bring in as many attributes of data as you want, but I would really like Cube to increase top line dimensions to 10.
  • The ability for cross level interaction within multiples cube would be a major plus once implemented.
Read full review
  • sometimes it is hard to produce pixel perfect reports from the Web UI. I know it is not made for this, but still, it'll be great
  • getting in e.g. an Excel file just by drag and drop, and the AI should "understand" what the data is all around
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Since IBM Cognos Express is suitable only for medium data warehouse environment, we are not sure if this tool solves the long term need as the business keeps growing rapidly. So its a 50/50 ratio to renew Express license. But having said that, the components of IBM Cognos Express are also available in other Cognos BI suites like Cognos 10.x version. So we will probably upgrade our environment to IBM Cognos 10.x which comes with more new features.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
IBM Planning Analytics is generally good in terms of functionalities. It can be used reduce time for budget planning, resource planning, demand forecasting, etc. The performance of IBM Planning Analytics is acceptable, but user interface can be improved. It would be good to see new features that allow users to customise the dashboard.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Although I find the IBM Planning analytics documentation quite time consuming, their support with email and call is something i can term as very considerate and patient, I have had few calls about the features and how i would want to implement them within my projects, and the teams have been super helpful to resolve my issues
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cube was just a lot easier to use than Vena. We took some time to look at Vena as well and while their product was impressive, our organization was not yet there. We needed something we could implement quickly, and in today's day and age I think that is a very important quality to have. Start up and early stage companies do not have the luxury of implementation teams and massive IT resources so Cube was a huge help.
Read full review
For strong technical teams and flexibility IBM Planning Analytics is the way to go. For quicker adoption and less technical teams Anaplan is the best option. If consolidation, financials, and moving from legacy tools are main focus than OneStream will be a really good choice. If deeply invested into SAP already than the SAP BPC will be the best fit to maintain the investment.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It has decreased the amount of time it takes to build reports by days
  • I can rest easy knowing the knowledge is accurate and there is no human error
  • I have been able to create more reports than I ever dreamed of with the new time and ease of use
Read full review
  • Much higher degree of accuracy in forecasting with the use of predictive analysis from historical data
  • Dozens of man hours saved in routine processes that are now handled with minimal human interaction
  • One system that holds the "source of truth," consolidating multiple systems together that were only accessible individually before
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Planning Analytics Screenshots

Screenshot of Workflow managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Margin analysisScreenshot of Metrics managementScreenshot of Income statementScreenshot of Expense analysis