Cyberark Secrets Manager vs. Venafi Zero Touch PKI

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cyberark Secrets Manager
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Cyberark Secrets Manager (formerly Conjur) is used to securely authenticate, control and audit non-human access across tools, applications, containers and cloud environments via a secrets management software solution.N/A
Venafi Zero Touch PKI
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Venafi Zero Touch PKI is a SaaS-based alternative to creating and running an internal PKI. It can be configured and managed in any way needed, in conjunction with multiple CAs and options for security and traceability.N/A
Pricing
Cyberark Secrets ManagerVenafi Zero Touch PKI
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cyberark Secrets ManagerVenafi Zero Touch PKI
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
User Ratings
Cyberark Secrets ManagerVenafi Zero Touch PKI
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cyberark Secrets ManagerVenafi Zero Touch PKI
Likelihood to Recommend
Cyberark Conjur is well-suited and includes the following: > Securing access to sensitive data in multi-cloud environments. > Providing secure access to secrets and credentials for 3rd party services and applications
Read full review
It works well for managing certificates in large, intricate systems, particularly in cloud and hybrid configurations. For tiny settings where certificate management is not necessary, it is less helpful.
Read full review
Pros
  • Provide allow-list
  • verifying authority
  • validate access
Read full review
  • It handles our certifications; no manual labor is required.
  • keeps things from breaking by promptly renewing certifications.
Read full review
Cons
  • Searching containers can be difficult if you're not sure which you're looking for.
  • Initial authorization can be slow, specifically if the first instance failed.
Read full review
  • The user interface may be simpler to use.
  • There isn't much space to modify things as we would like
  • Sometimes it can be difficult to set up integrations.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Once set up, it's quite simple to use. It saves time, avoids errors, automates everything, and requires little manual labor to operate across several systems.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cyberark Conjur has been a great asset to our company as it is a one stop shop that holds individuals, teams, departments, and the entire company accountable for the safety network. Not only do you have to be authorized to access Cyberark Conjuryou have to reauthorize to open, copy, or see individual passwords or accounts leaving a cyber trace of all your actions. There's no way to accidently get into something you're not supposed to be in.
Read full review
Venafi Zero Touch PKI is notable for its robust automation and user-friendliness in hybrid settings. It is more suitable for us in terms of time savings and less manual errors because it is easier to set up and manage than GlobalSign, and Keyfactor.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Before Cyberark we put passwords in a spread sheet - leaving exposure to theft.
  • Gives security compliance to our company
  • Keeps company and teams secure and safe.
Read full review
  • The team does less manual labor.
  • Maintains uninterrupted operations
  • It keeps us safe without requiring additional work
Read full review
ScreenShots

Cyberark Secrets Manager Screenshots

Screenshot of CyberArk Conjur UIScreenshot of CyberArk Conjur UIScreenshot of CyberArk Conjur UI