CyberArk Workforce Identity vs. Google Authenticator

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CyberArk Workforce Identity
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
CyberArk Identity is a SaaS-delivered suite of solutions designed to simplify identity and access management in enterprises. CyberArk Identity unifies Workforce Access and Identity Management solutions in a single offering. Workforce Access capabilities include single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, session security, and credential management. Identity Management capabilities include lifecycle management, identity orchestration, and identity governance. With CyberArk Identity,…N/A
Google Authenticator
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Google Authenticator is a mobile authentication app.N/A
Pricing
CyberArk Workforce IdentityGoogle Authenticator
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CyberArk Workforce IdentityGoogle Authenticator
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CyberArk Workforce IdentityGoogle Authenticator
Considered Both Products
CyberArk Workforce Identity
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
They are IAM tools that provide single sign-on access, allowing us to easily and securely access and integrate the software to the tool of our choice.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
It's a more affordable option. That's the main reason why our team went with Centrify. From the admin side, its a really clean interface.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
CA AuthMinder & SiteMinder
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify offered us more for our money by being more than just an SSO platform. There were several other features included such as MDM and MFA. This started other initiatives for us and felt the other solutions we evaluated would not have been able to provide.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
We reviewed Okta and OneLogin while looking at Centrify for our ticketing solution SSO partner. When doing so we looked at it from the aspect of if we wanted to roll this out where we could see the use cases for it and initially it would be in a couple departments then branch …
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify provided both SSO support as well as Mac support; we needed both. Other products had one or the other, but not both.

This made choosing Centrify a no-brainer as we didn't have to have a wide variety of integrations to do and vendors to manage.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
I think they are quite similar and don't have enough knowledge about one over another.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
We selected Centrify for their breadth of services and their number of template applications which makes integrating an app a breeze.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify was introduced to provide a secure, versatile and easy-to-use login experience, but it is still competiting against the other products that are in use within our company.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Seemed to be the best in breed and the one with deeper Mac integration on the short roadmap. As an Apple Distinguished School, this is obviously very critical to us. Very easy to set up and it has a deep pre-canned application pool for already deployed apps. Very easy for …
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity

During our evaluation process, Centrify could show in the PoC that they are very flexible and open minded to our ideas. An application integration which was not part of the product catalog has been integrated for free. Furthermore the whole package compared to the …

Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify's pricing was much better than their competitors. They also offered a better sign-in/multi-factor experience for our users when doing pilot testing. Their product also included other features like Mobile Device Management that was a nice add-on.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Quest seemed archaic and lacking in features when compared to Centrify.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify was a quick roll out for us. The cost was comparable to other tools we looked at and Centrify had additional security options.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
We evaluated Clever, even though it is free to schools, tech support was almost non-existent. It doesn’t integrate easily with Active Directory.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
We started off using ADFS from Microsoft, which took most of a day to get fully functional and nearly a week to get fully optimized. The documentation was inconsistent with ADFS and there was no real support without opening a Microsoft Premier Support ticket. At the time, if …
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
We felt that Centrify had the most flexibility for the cost. They also have fairly robust mobile device management capabilities which some of the other products did not have.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify provided mobile device management and identify access management from one pane of glass, and was less expensive.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify offers many more features and much better control.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
We selected Centrify over some of the other services out their because it gives us more options such as SSO and MDM all in one and for the most part it is easy to use not only for the administrator but also for the end user.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
OneLogin and Okta provide similar experiences, but OneLogin is less mature than Centrify. Their Mac and Windows management suites are still in a beta phase are cannot be deployed en masse to our user base. Okta is more expensive and does not have the security compliance. …
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify was a much better fit for our organization size and a much simpler utility to manage.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
I was previously a OneLogin customer and even though Centrify has a lot more features, I'd have to say that my experience with OneLogin versus Centrify has been a lot better overall.
Google Authenticator
Chose Google Authenticator
Salesforce Field Service, LinkedIn Jobs, LinkedIn Marketing Solutions, Microsoft 365, Microsoft Powerpoint, Microsoft Excel, AutoCAD, Instagram for Business, LinkedIn Sales Navigator and LinkedIn Premium Business
Chose Google Authenticator
There are a few things to keep in mind when using Google Authenticator. Second, it's imperative that everything be kept as simple as possible. Many customers don't understand why they're putting up MFA, therefore adding further difficulty to their daily routines is always a …
Chose Google Authenticator
Being under the google umbrella gives a level of reassurance to our users. It seems to be cleaner and easier to use for our users. Being able to use a product from an already known vendor helps onboard new users to the software. It is clean and easy to use, all of the users …
Chose Google Authenticator
First, Google Authenticator meets the security requirements which should be considered "table stakes". Second, simplicity is critical. Many users don' understand why they are setting up MFA (or they just don't care), and so adding additional complications to their day-to-day is …
Chose Google Authenticator
Setup was easier and transferring between accounts is simpler in Google Authenticator when compared against Symantec VIP. The other features kind of are the same where both provide keys in offline mode and work seamlessly. Keys are refreshed every 30 seconds in both the …
Chose Google Authenticator
For myself and my business, we have not explored any other Authenticator out there. We have had no real issues with Google Authenticator and have no plans to switch.
Chose Google Authenticator
We were using Duo before in our environment for two-factor environment. But when it comes to availability we were always facing issues such as time-sync & app integration. After using Google Authenticator it resolved our synchronization issues as well as the third-party tool …
Chose Google Authenticator
Google Authenticator is cost-effective & a bucket of features as compared to other available solutions in the market. Google Authenticator provides a multi-layer of security with ease of integration features.
Chose Google Authenticator
I've used only this software for the last 2 years and have never faced any issues so no need to go to another application.
Chose Google Authenticator
I used Cisco Secure Access Duo in my organization but I was not happy with [the] services. It creates lots of problems so I switched to google authenticator and it is really good. I am very happy with this software. No need to search [for] another option.
Chose Google Authenticator
Google authenticator can only run on mobile devices, which makes for a more secure authentication flow.
1Password's desktop multi-factor authentication is easier to use, but it's the same device so is a weaker form of multi-factor authentication and thus less secure.
Chose Google Authenticator
I stopped using google authenticator once I lost my primary phone.
Chose Google Authenticator
Google Authenticator is awesome. We used LastPass in the past. In general, I don't like password saving or authenticating services because it feels like a vault that I am putting all my trust in. With Google, they have made it so easy and secure, I feel confident. I have …
Chose Google Authenticator
Google Authenticator is only really competing against SMS two-factor. Instead of getting a text from random phone numbers all the time, you go to one app/ website to get access to any account.

In addition, we can allow our members to share the same Google account (with a master …
Chose Google Authenticator
We are using our WhatsApp Business Account to send OTP to our users, but we can't control our users for having a WhatsApp Account. And WhatsApp API is not free too and so complicated to implement. Google Authenticator is a good alternative and cost-free to our users for getting …
Chose Google Authenticator
LastPass is the most similar to Authenticator that we're currently using, but I honestly wouldn't say they are all that similar. Authenticator is another step up, security-wise, from password managers as far as internet safety goes.
Chose Google Authenticator
I tried a few other apps and decided to personally go with Authy, but I usually recommend Google Authenticator for most people who just want something simple and easy to use.

I also tried Microsoft Authenticator (not available in the list above), but it didn't work as well as …
Chose Google Authenticator
Google Authenticator is a great alternative to FortiAuthenticator for our vendors to have us use to login securely to their secure portals and FTP sites. Google Authenticator does not require a setup by the Admin in order to use it. Google Authenticator does not require …
Chose Google Authenticator
Google Authenticator is well known and trusted in the space.
Chose Google Authenticator
Twilio Authy is our preferred alternative - it features a lot of the same good features, along with a nicer backup setup and a more robust security model.
Chose Google Authenticator
CyberDuo was also looked at - but because we were already set up with Google in our organization this seemed the way to go. Again, I am a user and have no authority in that area, but Google was seamless and transitioned us right into what was needed here.
Features
CyberArk Workforce IdentityGoogle Authenticator
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
CyberArk Workforce Identity
9.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Google Authenticator
-
Ratings
ID-Management Access Control9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Password Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Risk Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CyberArk Workforce IdentityGoogle Authenticator
Small Businesses
1Password
1Password
Score 9.5 out of 10
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CyberArk Workforce IdentityGoogle Authenticator
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
4.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CyberArk Workforce IdentityGoogle Authenticator
Likelihood to Recommend
Centrify Identity Service is well suited for nearly any organization, especially ones utilizing Active Directory for user management. It is especially well suited for organizations looking to reduce internal resource use, because it's easy to maintain and manage. Its features also allow you to free up resources previously dedicated to the provisioning and deprovisioning of Office 365/Salesforce users (as well as other applications).
Read full review
It is supported by virtually all cloud-based software applications for business. I am happy to allow users to use this in addition to other authenticators. Certainly, if your business is in the Google cloud it makes sense, but my approach to the remote/virtual work world these past couple of years has been structured flexibility. Leaving some choice up to the users for their own comfort, particularly when they are using their own devices. I cannot think of a scenario where it is less appropriate - perhaps where you run the risk of "app sprawl". I.e., where you are requiring users to handle multiple authenticators (which can happen with certain pieces of hardware) you may want to encourage consolidation into one to avoid frustration.
Read full review
Pros
  • Single Sign-on Integration is easy and complete configuration is UI driven with lots of help tips
  • RESTFul APIs for Multi-factor Authentication is easy to use and implement. Also, Centrify supports all new Security features for Multi Factor Authentication and hence you can easily select and configure different challenges based on the policies and roles for the user.
  • Lots of Built-in reports available for normal day to day auditing.
Read full review
  • Easy implementation: The product is very easy to implement both from embedding it into the application and from end users using it via their smartphones.
  • You can use Google Authenticator to manage multiple two-factor authentication keys.
  • Easy to add keys options: You can scan a QR code to set up 2FA in Google Authenticator. You can also do a manual entry using the unique key provided by the application you are setting up 2FA for.
Read full review
Cons
  • Occasionally, I get logged out of Gmail, sometimes in the middle of an email. I'm not sure why it happens, but I think it has something to do with timing out. Which is strange because I'm on email all day. Not sure why.
Read full review
  • It runs on only a few platforms, specifically Android, iOS, and Blackberry and in my opinion it needs to be available on every platform that is out there.
  • SA drawback I have noticed is that if you swap phones you have to blitz the entire app and go back and sync up all the accounts again which can be very frustrating for new users.
  • It can also be risky ( for some ) having all all your data centralized in one place.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Centrify is central to creating efficiency and safety for our clients and internally. To remove it would cause a massive disturbance in the lives of our employees and our clients.
Read full review
It works as intended, easy to setup, free and gives you another level of security against any unwanted access or cyber attacks
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It's as easy as opening the app and what I need it for is there. I don't have to fumble with other accounts or getting something else to open it for me. I have all the access that I need for the use of the app within seconds and I can get access to the info that I need.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
In terms of availability, I had not experienced any issues with outages or the product not working when needed
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
The performance of google Authenticator is good and I have not experienced any slow downs
Read full review
Support Rating
The support staff thus far has been very helpful. At times I feel they are driving the process forward without my intervention or constant reminder, which is nice to have in a company for a change. Most support seems to be a hassle but so far Centrify appears to treat your project as their own project.
Read full review
I have found Google’s support to be hit or miss. There are times when they are very responsive, and I get my issue resolved quickly, and there are times where a response from them takes weeks. There is no in-between. But my support experience with this particular product is nonexistent because I have not had a problem with it yet. Hopefully, we do not have any problems with it either.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
It was easy to implement and it went very smoothly. No issues
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We started off using ADFS from Microsoft, which took most of a day to get fully functional and nearly a week to get fully optimized. The documentation was inconsistent with ADFS and there was no real support without opening a Microsoft Premier Support ticket. At the time, if you turned on Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for Office 365, it turned it on for everything without any granularity. Our Information Security department said that MFA was a requirement for offsite access to our email systems, but users didn't need MFA when onsite. We looked at Okta, OneLogin, and Centrify at the same time. Centrify was the only one that responded quickly and offered a free POC with support included. We tried to deploy the Okta solution on our own, but ran into issues due to some of our non-standard AD configuration. We never received a return call from OneLogin. The Centrify POC took about 15 minutes to complete for basic functionality and a couple of hours to work out the issues related to our environment. We have been very happy with the Centrify solution and went live with our POC.
Read full review
This product doesn't ensure single-use, real-time codes. This puts our data at risk and is not as secure as Google Authenticator. I anticipate using Google Authenticator as long as we continue to use the full Google Suite for business. It helps to streamline data and accounts.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
The product doesn’t have any features of tools that can help it scale
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • CyberArk Workforce Identity provides secure access to on-premises and cloud applications. The platform is highly scalable and works well for companies of any size.
  • I can classify and label data. Also keep track of activity in shared applications and data, to know exactly who accesses each of the files.
Read full review
  • I would say from my limited role in the programs deployed and just being a user, this has been a valuable tool so our ROI is high. We get security and can breathe knowing we have authentication for those who have to be on our network and we are able to protect our work.
Read full review
ScreenShots

CyberArk Workforce Identity Screenshots

Screenshot of Admin PortalScreenshot of Identity LoginScreenshot of SWS PortalScreenshot of UBA PortalScreenshot of User Portal