CyberArk Workforce Identity vs. HID DigitalPersona

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CyberArk Workforce Identity
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
CyberArk Identity is a SaaS-delivered suite of solutions designed to simplify identity and access management in enterprises. CyberArk Identity unifies Workforce Access and Identity Management solutions in a single offering. Workforce Access capabilities include single sign-on, multi-factor authentication, session security, and credential management. Identity Management capabilities include lifecycle management, identity orchestration, and identity governance. With CyberArk Identity,…N/A
HID DigitalPersona
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
HID DigitalPersona (formerly Crossmatch) provides a comprehensive multi-factor authentication solution. The vendor’s value proposition is that their solution frees users from cumbersome login activities while making it easy for an IT Team to secure access to their networks, data and applications.
$3.75
per user per month
Pricing
CyberArk Workforce IdentityHID DigitalPersona
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
HID DigitalPersona
$3.75
per user per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CyberArk Workforce IdentityHID DigitalPersona
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CyberArk Workforce IdentityHID DigitalPersona
Considered Both Products
CyberArk Workforce Identity
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
They are IAM tools that provide single sign-on access, allowing us to easily and securely access and integrate the software to the tool of our choice.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
It's a more affordable option. That's the main reason why our team went with Centrify. From the admin side, its a really clean interface.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
CA AuthMinder & SiteMinder
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify offered us more for our money by being more than just an SSO platform. There were several other features included such as MDM and MFA. This started other initiatives for us and felt the other solutions we evaluated would not have been able to provide.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
We reviewed Okta and OneLogin while looking at Centrify for our ticketing solution SSO partner. When doing so we looked at it from the aspect of if we wanted to roll this out where we could see the use cases for it and initially it would be in a couple departments then branch …
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify provided both SSO support as well as Mac support; we needed both. Other products had one or the other, but not both.

This made choosing Centrify a no-brainer as we didn't have to have a wide variety of integrations to do and vendors to manage.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
I think they are quite similar and don't have enough knowledge about one over another.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
We selected Centrify for their breadth of services and their number of template applications which makes integrating an app a breeze.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify was introduced to provide a secure, versatile and easy-to-use login experience, but it is still competiting against the other products that are in use within our company.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Seemed to be the best in breed and the one with deeper Mac integration on the short roadmap. As an Apple Distinguished School, this is obviously very critical to us. Very easy to set up and it has a deep pre-canned application pool for already deployed apps. Very easy for …
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity

During our evaluation process, Centrify could show in the PoC that they are very flexible and open minded to our ideas. An application integration which was not part of the product catalog has been integrated for free. Furthermore the whole package compared to the …

Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify's pricing was much better than their competitors. They also offered a better sign-in/multi-factor experience for our users when doing pilot testing. Their product also included other features like Mobile Device Management that was a nice add-on.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Quest seemed archaic and lacking in features when compared to Centrify.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify was a quick roll out for us. The cost was comparable to other tools we looked at and Centrify had additional security options.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
We evaluated Clever, even though it is free to schools, tech support was almost non-existent. It doesn’t integrate easily with Active Directory.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
We started off using ADFS from Microsoft, which took most of a day to get fully functional and nearly a week to get fully optimized. The documentation was inconsistent with ADFS and there was no real support without opening a Microsoft Premier Support ticket. At the time, if …
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
We felt that Centrify had the most flexibility for the cost. They also have fairly robust mobile device management capabilities which some of the other products did not have.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify provided mobile device management and identify access management from one pane of glass, and was less expensive.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify offers many more features and much better control.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
We selected Centrify over some of the other services out their because it gives us more options such as SSO and MDM all in one and for the most part it is easy to use not only for the administrator but also for the end user.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
OneLogin and Okta provide similar experiences, but OneLogin is less mature than Centrify. Their Mac and Windows management suites are still in a beta phase are cannot be deployed en masse to our user base. Okta is more expensive and does not have the security compliance. …
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
Centrify was a much better fit for our organization size and a much simpler utility to manage.
Chose CyberArk Workforce Identity
I was previously a OneLogin customer and even though Centrify has a lot more features, I'd have to say that my experience with OneLogin versus Centrify has been a lot better overall.
HID DigitalPersona
Chose HID DigitalPersona
I know its not a direct competitor but HID is better in all the sense its amazing because of its integration with Microsoft Azure AD. It has overall better functionality as it doesnt work on cloud premises it can also be used on premises. The best part is one can use mfa …
Chose HID DigitalPersona
We've been using HID DigitalPersona for so long that I honestly can't recall what other products we did investigated. We have been satisfied with the app for a very long time, therefore we don't see the need to explore other options.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
It has a greater advantage than Okta because it gives a variety of verification options and allows biometrics logging in, which is something the other software does not, in my suggestion.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
HID DigitalPersona is selected against them as it has a reliable and a great secured software which has a versatile access to other platforms as well which saves a lot software to be taken and HID DigitalPersona is a one stop solution to all problems it has everything a …
Chose HID DigitalPersona
Our use of HID DigitalPersona has been for long that I really can't remember what other products we looked at. We have happy with app for a very long time thus I don't see the need to look at other possibilities.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
overall HID was a better pick it had more features and was cheaper in comparison. its integration with Azure ad makes it super helpful.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
Not proper usage with AWS but HID has been really versatile it just works as we need to login to system has become really easy and fast because of it. The multi factor authorization gives you the freedom to chose from a variety of authentication methods such as biometric login, …
Chose HID DigitalPersona
In comaprison to okta its better suited as it has array of authentication methods and it also offers login via biometric which according to me is not present in the other software.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
HID is really superior because we can use it on any device. It also has MFA (Multi-factor authorization), which provides an extra layer of security.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
HID DigitalPersona is a better optionbecause of its many authentication factors,integration options, andcentralized management.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
They both are great and offer great features such as single sign on and top, but HID DigitalPersona is ahead of Ping identity because it offers Biometrics as well and it can also work in offline setting as well.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
Strong authentication, multifactor authentication, biometrics, and integration set HID DigitalPersona apart, making it an excellent option for a range of authentication requirements.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
I don't have excessive experience with One login, but it wasn't as feature rich as HID DigitalPersona. The best part about HID DigitalPersona is that it can be used in offline settings as well.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
HID serves all our purposes and is not that expensive its integration with microsoft active directory makes it super helpful. It is loaded with features that are not just for show off but actually works its a great software and we dont think any other software can match its …
Chose HID DigitalPersona
HID DigitalPersona is a great software from others as it provides a great security and trusted 2 factor authentication which helps in creating a system integrator with trust and ease of use it has been proved to be a great software by it's easy and accessible user interface …
Chose HID DigitalPersona
HID provides better integration option more authentication options and its easier to use. The integration which helps HID the most is Azure's active directory it makes HID better in all regards. It acts as a centralized system to protect all the resources and data of your …
Chose HID DigitalPersona
Okta Workflows (previously Azuqua) focuses on application integration and workflow automation while HID DigitalPersona stresses authentication security and compliance.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
The benefit of HID DigitalPersona is it uses a biometric method for authentication. It can be integrated with Azure which means it is more features reach and offers multiple factor authorization and SSO.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
A number of factors, including HID DigitalPersona's extensive range of authentication methods, easy integration with Microsoft Active Directory, support for a variety of use cases, robust compliance and security features, and affordable pricing or licensing models, may make it …
Chose HID DigitalPersona
We have used HID DigitalPersona for over 8 years and have been so satisfied with the product that we just haven't even looked because we like the product that much.
Chose HID DigitalPersona
We went the other direction. DigitalPersona was our initial implementation, but we have moved away from DigitalPersona and moved to a product called TecMFA. Our organization has implemented Okta as our application and Azure as our multifactor authentication platform, and …
Features
CyberArk Workforce IdentityHID DigitalPersona
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
CyberArk Workforce Identity
9.0
Ratings
11% above category average
HID DigitalPersona
-
Ratings
ID-Management Access Control9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Password Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
ID Risk Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CyberArk Workforce IdentityHID DigitalPersona
Small Businesses
1Password
1Password
Score 9.5 out of 10
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
OneLogin by One Identity
OneLogin by One Identity
Score 9.6 out of 10
Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CyberArk Workforce IdentityHID DigitalPersona
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CyberArk Workforce IdentityHID DigitalPersona
Likelihood to Recommend
Centrify Identity Service is well suited for nearly any organization, especially ones utilizing Active Directory for user management. It is especially well suited for organizations looking to reduce internal resource use, because it's easy to maintain and manage. Its features also allow you to free up resources previously dedicated to the provisioning and deprovisioning of Office 365/Salesforce users (as well as other applications).
Read full review
During the onboarding process, remote workers can enroll their fingerprints or create secure PINs. This eliminates the need for complicated passwords and enables them to safely access company resources and critical apps from remote locations. HID DigitalPersona's robust authentication techniques and access control features can assist you in adhering to data security laws.
Read full review
Pros
  • Single Sign-on Integration is easy and complete configuration is UI driven with lots of help tips
  • RESTFul APIs for Multi-factor Authentication is easy to use and implement. Also, Centrify supports all new Security features for Multi Factor Authentication and hence you can easily select and configure different challenges based on the policies and roles for the user.
  • Lots of Built-in reports available for normal day to day auditing.
Read full review
  • Super fast to recognize fingerprint and authenticate .
  • Accurate with a wide area of fingerprint. Most windows laptops with built in fingerprint scanners only recognize a small area of print.
  • Units are inexpensive.
  • Quick and easy to install server software and client hardware.
  • When workstations were upgraded from Windows 8.1 to Windows 10 the software continued working flawlessly.
Read full review
Cons
  • Occasionally, I get logged out of Gmail, sometimes in the middle of an email. I'm not sure why it happens, but I think it has something to do with timing out. Which is strange because I'm on email all day. Not sure why.
Read full review
  • Multiple domains - DigitalPersona struggles with multiple domains. Since the solution is licensed per domain, migrating users between domains can be troublesome to keep licensed. Additionally, migrating to a new domain removes the AD leaf objects that store all digital persona information, essentially wiping out and credentials or other stored information.
  • Password change - DigitalPersona can be confusing to update when a stored password for a website is updated. The password is entered, and then the user is redirected to the websites password change page. Users must then authenticate with a Digital persona credential again before being prompted by Digital Persona to update the password. If the user is allowed to change the password manually through the websites page, this will lead to what is stored in Digital Persona being out of sync with the new password, and eventually account lockouts.
  • Terminal Server - DigitalPersona has performance issues when utilized on a high-traffic terminal server. Often it causes big CPU spikes as well as hanging sessions upon disconnect.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Centrify is central to creating efficiency and safety for our clients and internally. To remove it would cause a massive disturbance in the lives of our employees and our clients.
Read full review
It is wonderful for multifactor authentication and gives us many options for what we use to authenticate. All of our users use it and it is engrained into our group policies and people would be very disappointed if it went away.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
I think there are still fundamental enhancements needed to be added to the management consoles and I think there ought to be a Centralized, Windows Based "Thick" Management Application instead of individual utilities which vary from MMCs, Scripts, Wizards, etc.
Read full review
Support Rating
The support staff thus far has been very helpful. At times I feel they are driving the process forward without my intervention or constant reminder, which is nice to have in a company for a change. Most support seems to be a hassle but so far Centrify appears to treat your project as their own project.
Read full review
Extremely poor; I've never encountered such. Professional Services completely dropped us for months. Crossmatch tech support seems like it has 3 techs tops! No response to emails, calls, the absolute worst! I will never recommend DP to anyone.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Could use tools to audit license usage at a more granular level as to allow an administrator to free up licenses from users whom seldom use their biometrics to login.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We started off using ADFS from Microsoft, which took most of a day to get fully functional and nearly a week to get fully optimized. The documentation was inconsistent with ADFS and there was no real support without opening a Microsoft Premier Support ticket. At the time, if you turned on Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) for Office 365, it turned it on for everything without any granularity. Our Information Security department said that MFA was a requirement for offsite access to our email systems, but users didn't need MFA when onsite. We looked at Okta, OneLogin, and Centrify at the same time. Centrify was the only one that responded quickly and offered a free POC with support included. We tried to deploy the Okta solution on our own, but ran into issues due to some of our non-standard AD configuration. We never received a return call from OneLogin. The Centrify POC took about 15 minutes to complete for basic functionality and a couple of hours to work out the issues related to our environment. We have been very happy with the Centrify solution and went live with our POC.
Read full review
We evaluated Cisco DUO but ultimately chose HID because of their support for biometrics. With DUO every user would have to have the authentication app on their personal phone and pull it out each time they had to log in. We definitely did not want this for our frontline staff as it would slow the process way down
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • CyberArk Workforce Identity provides secure access to on-premises and cloud applications. The platform is highly scalable and works well for companies of any size.
  • I can classify and label data. Also keep track of activity in shared applications and data, to know exactly who accesses each of the files.
Read full review
  • Provides a quick one finger authentication\log-on.
  • Logging onto a machine that is used by several other users, such as in retail is no problem because the DigitalPersona software does a switch user function instead of logging out the other user.
  • One negative that was apparent immediately after installing the DigitalPersona software was that users very easily forgot their Windows passwords because of the one finger log-on.
Read full review
ScreenShots

CyberArk Workforce Identity Screenshots

Screenshot of Admin PortalScreenshot of Identity LoginScreenshot of SWS PortalScreenshot of UBA PortalScreenshot of User Portal