Cybereason Defense Platform vs. Cynet 360

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cybereason Defense Platform
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Cybereason EDR consolidates intelligence about each attack into a Malop (malicious operation), a contextualized view of the full narrative of an attack. Each Malop organizes the relevant attack data into an easy-to-read, interactive graphical interface, providing a complete timeline, the flow of the attack in the network, and any malicious communications. Remediation actions can be automated or accomplished remotely with a click. The Cybereason Defense Platform empowers analysts of all…N/A
Cynet 360
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
New York based Cynet offers their XDR platform Cynet 360, which monitors endpoints and networks, correlates and analyzes suspicious behavior, and provides automated remedial protection and manual remediation guidance to contain and eliminate cyber attackers.N/A
Pricing
Cybereason Defense PlatformCynet 360
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cybereason Defense PlatformCynet 360
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cybereason Defense PlatformCynet 360
Considered Both Products
Cybereason Defense Platform
Chose Cybereason Defense Platform
Cybereason provides superior protection than either Microsoft or CrowdStrike and a better TCO. We receive less false positives than with Microsoft Defender and Cybereason is easier for level 1 users to use.
Chose Cybereason Defense Platform
It doesn't rely on signatures, most parts of their detection are behavior-based, and their marketing says that they have the lowest false positive rate in the market. It composes our server and notebooks endpoint solutions to protect against external threats and block internal …
Cynet 360
Chose Cynet 360
We decided to use and test cynet360 after we stopped using trend micro worry free. We initially noticed a big difference in the large amount of information for analysis that exists compared to the micro trend that we used, but with a slightly more complex and a little …
Chose Cynet 360
It's simply better, more robust, easier to use user interface, better CyOps support, packaged solution without needing all the add-ons of the noted solutions.
Chose Cynet 360
It simply is more transparent, includes 24x7x365 an so far has provided awesome support and training to use the tool without adding consultants costs.
Features
Cybereason Defense PlatformCynet 360
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Cybereason Defense Platform
9.1
Ratings
6% above category average
Cynet 360
-
Ratings
Anti-Exploit Technology8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Management9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Infection Remediation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Malware Detection10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cybereason Defense PlatformCynet 360
Small Businesses
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.5 out of 10
SentinelOne Singularity
SentinelOne Singularity
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 9.8 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cybereason Defense PlatformCynet 360
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cybereason Defense PlatformCynet 360
Likelihood to Recommend
Cybereason is good at detections and has some false positives, but when we need their support, it's too slow. My team used to test Cybereason, submitting lots of malware and threats, trying to find problems, and for research purposes. In my experience, every time we found a bug, their support team denied the problems and took lots of weeks to give some answer when we insisted.
Read full review
All type of malicious attacks on endpoints whether it is known threat or unknown. Better ransomware & zero-day coverage.It helps organization with deeper visibility in to security incidents,unmatched protection & incident response service.
Read full review
Pros
  • EDR
  • Threat hunting
  • anti-malware
  • collecting telemetry
Read full review
  • Deception technology.
  • Detection of malicious events.
  • Support.
  • CyOps team of support.
Read full review
Cons
  • Slow support
  • Bugs on their interface
  • Log extraction
Read full review
  • Reporting
  • Time zone
  • Siem
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cybereason provides superior protection than either Microsoft or CrowdStrike and a better TCO. We receive less false positives than with Microsoft Defender and Cybereason is easier for level 1 users to use.
Read full review
We decided to use and test cynet360 after we stopped using trend micro worry free. We initially noticed a big difference in the large amount of information for analysis that exists compared to the micro trend that we used, but with a slightly more complex and a little non-intuitive interface of cynet360
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Helps on threat hunting
  • MalOps is very good
  • When we face a bug, it takes too much time for them to respond
Read full review
  • Attacks has been controlled and hence loss of data is less.
Read full review
ScreenShots