Cybereason Defense Platform vs. Google Security Command Center

Cybereason Defense Platform

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Cybereason Defense Platform	Score 10.0 out of 10	N/A	Cybereason EDR consolidates intelligence about each attack into a Malop (malicious operation), a contextualized view of the full narrative of an attack. Each Malop organizes the relevant attack data into an easy-to-read, interactive graphical interface, providing a complete timeline, the flow of the attack in the network, and any malicious communications. Remediation actions can be automated or accomplished remotely with a click. The Cybereason Defense Platform empowers analysts of all…	N/A
Google Security Command Center	Score 1.0 out of 10	N/A	Google's Security Command Center is the built-in security and risk management solution for Google Cloud. It is used to identify misconfigurations and vulnerabilities, pinpoint cyber risks and prioritize remediation, detect threats targeting Google Cloud resources, and manage regulatory compliance.	N/A

Pricing

Cybereason Defense Platform

Google Security Command Center

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Cybereason Defense Platform	Google Security Command Center
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Cybereason Defense Platform	Google Security Command Center
Considered Both Products	Cybereason Defense Platform Keith Barros Senior Director, Information Security Chose Cybereason Defense Platform Cybereason provides superior protection than either Microsoft or CrowdStrike and a better TCO. We receive less false positives than with Microsoft Defender and Cybereason is easier for level 1 users to use. Incentivized Helpful? Jarcy de Azevedo Junior Cyber Security Tech Lead Chose Cybereason Defense Platform It doesn't rely on signatures, most parts of their detection are behavior-based, and their marketing says that they have the lowest false positive rate in the market. It composes our server and notebooks endpoint solutions to protect against external threats and block internal … Incentivized Helpful?	Google Security Command Center No answer on this topic

Features

Cybereason Defense Platform

Google Security Command Center

Endpoint Security

Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
	Cybereason Defense Platform 9.1 Ratings 6% above category average	Google Security Command Center - Ratings
Anti-Exploit Technology	8.30 Ratings	00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	9.60 Ratings	00 Ratings
Centralized Management	9.60 Ratings	00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support	6.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Infection Remediation	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings
Malware Detection	10.00 Ratings	00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Cybereason Defense Platform	Google Security Command Center
Small Businesses	ThreatLocker Score 9.5 out of 10	Armor Score 6.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT) Score 9.1 out of 10	Druva Security Cloud Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises	BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 9.8 out of 10	Druva Security Cloud Score 9.7 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Cybereason Defense Platform	Google Security Command Center
Likelihood to Recommend	8.7 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Cybereason Defense Platform	Google Security Command Center
Likelihood to Recommend	Cybereason is good at detections and has some false positives, but when we need their support, it's too slow. My team used to test Cybereason, submitting lots of malware and threats, trying to find problems, and for research purposes. In my experience, every time we found a bug, their support team denied the problems and took lots of weeks to give some answer when we insisted. Incentivized Jarcy de Azevedo Junior Cyber Security Tech Lead Read full review	No answers on this topic
Pros	EDR Threat hunting anti-malware collecting telemetry Incentivized Keith Barros Senior Director, Information Security Read full review	No answers on this topic
Cons	Slow support Bugs on their interface Log extraction Incentivized Jarcy de Azevedo Junior Cyber Security Tech Lead Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Cybereason provides superior protection than either Microsoft or CrowdStrike and a better TCO. We receive less false positives than with Microsoft Defender and Cybereason is easier for level 1 users to use. Incentivized Keith Barros Senior Director, Information Security Read full review	No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Helps on threat hunting MalOps is very good When we face a bug, it takes too much time for them to respond Incentivized Jarcy de Azevedo Junior Cyber Security Tech Lead Read full review	No answers on this topic
ScreenShots