TrustRadius

Cyberoam vs. N‑able DNS Filtering

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cyberoam
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
Sophos’s Cyberoam offers UTM and NGFW products. Cyberoam provides the full suite of modularized firewall services, as well as real-time reporting, for enterprise-level use.N/A
N‑able DNS Filtering
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N-able DNS Filtering is the company's solution that defends proactively against malicious advertising and harmful websites. The vendor's value proposition is that the solution provides stronger protection, greater network visibility, and user-based reporting—all from within the N‑able N-central® dashboard. Users can: Use AI and machine learning to recognize and block malicious websites in real-time Get DNS protection on a fast and reliable network Onboard…N/A
Pricing
CyberoamN‑able DNS Filtering
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CyberoamN‑able DNS Filtering
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CyberoamN‑able DNS Filtering
Considered Both Products
Cyberoam
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Cyberoam
The main factor is cost, as we are a startup organization. That's the main reason we choose Cyberoam stacks up against other network security services.
Sachin Vinay | TrustRadius Reviewer
Sachin Vinay
Network Administrator
Chose Cyberoam
FortiGate is more costly, that is probably the only reason for considering Cyberoam over FortiGate. Remaining all other criteria, FortiGate has surpassed Cyberoam.
Mark Yap | TrustRadius Reviewer
Mark Yap
IT Manager
Chose Cyberoam
At the time Fortinet wasn't open to changes and ease of use for our type of use case. Since then, the company has come a long way with ease of use of their product. We selected Cyberoam because of its UI and ease of use specifically for CIPA compliance for K-12.
N‑able DNS Filtering

No answer on this topic

Features
CyberoamN‑able DNS Filtering
Firewall
Comparison of Firewall features of Product A and Product B
Cyberoam
8.7
Ratings
1% above category average
N‑able DNS Filtering
-
Ratings
Identification Technologies8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Visualization Tools8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Inspection7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Policy-based Controls9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Active Directory and LDAP8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Firewall Management Console8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting and Logging9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
VPN8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
High Availability9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Stateful Inspection9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Proxy Server9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CyberoamN‑able DNS Filtering
Small Businesses
pfSense
pfSense
Score 9.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.6 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Palo Alto Networks Virtualized Next-Generation Firewalls - VM Series
Score 10.0 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CyberoamN‑able DNS Filtering
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CyberoamN‑able DNS Filtering
Likelihood to Recommend
Cyberoam is well suited for enterprises or institutions which require good and precise UTM features which could be used to conduct secure exams and to maintain a strict cyber environment. it is less suited for enterprises with a good change management process, as it would require experienced administrators to main this firewall.
Sachin Vinay | TrustRadius Reviewer
Sachin Vinay
Network Administrator
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Firewall logs is good thing that provided by Cyberoam.
  • Alerts and logs provided for different type of attacks and actions taken.
  • Ease of use functionality.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • SD Wan features require more clarity.
  • Traffic shaping policy is a missing feature.
Sachin Vinay | TrustRadius Reviewer
Sachin Vinay
Network Administrator
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
The main factor is cost, as we are a startup organization. That's the main reason we choose Cyberoam stacks up against other network security services.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Positive - time and cost savings on management
  • Positive - still best in class for ease of CIPA compliance for K-12
  • Negative - escalating costs are pushing us away from the solution
Mark Yap | TrustRadius Reviewer
Mark Yap
IT Manager
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots