Cycloid Platform Engineering vs. TeamCity

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cycloid Platform Engineering
Score 0.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Cycloid is an engineering platform designed to break down team silos, introduce DevOps best practices and support a hybrid cloud journey for enterprises. It's an internal developer platform that helps to facilitate end-to-end platform engineering adoption at scale in a clear and sustainable manner. Cycloid's Infra Import industrializes manually deployed infrastructure and creates Infra-as-code on the fly to ensure the sustainability and future-proof…
$39
per month per user
TeamCity
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
TeamCity is a continuous integration server from Czeck company JetBrains.N/A
Pricing
Cycloid Platform EngineeringTeamCity
Editions & Modules
End-users
$39
per month per user
End-users
$39
per month per user
Platform Teams
$65
per month per user
Platform Teams
$65
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cycloid Platform EngineeringTeamCity
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$2,500 per year per installationNo setup fee
Additional Details3 pricing models are available: - Subscription based - Cloud consumption based - Cloud reselling based (Cycloid is free of charge) Additional monthly platform fee which includes devOps support is applied based on the size and scope of the organization. Full details on Cycloid website.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cycloid Platform EngineeringTeamCity
Considered Both Products
Cycloid Platform Engineering

No answer on this topic

TeamCity
Chose TeamCity
Jenkins relies on being open source as the primary driver for its success. This low cost is a huge factor for many companies, both small and large. The professional, free tier of TeamCity offers a huge amount of growth before ever needing to pay anything. I personally also find …
Chose TeamCity
Since we were already making use of other JetBrains offerings, TeamCity had a leg up on the competition due to the ease of integration with these tools. With that said, TeamCity's feature set stacks up well with the competition. Jenkins definitely has some nice features, but …
Chose TeamCity
We are in the process to select one of them, but we are not decided yet
Chose TeamCity
This application is easy to install and deploy at site than most of the similar solutions in market. Easy user interface is one of the reason it can be installed. However each software have its good points and bad points. Study your organizations case and then only choose …
Chose TeamCity
I would also like to compare TeamCity against Snap-Ci as well as Concourse. We chose TeamCity over all of these tools because of its ability to be set up easily against a restricting corporate firewall. We needed to integrate unit tests, integration tests, pushes to production, …
Chose TeamCity
While TeamCity is more limited product than VSTS (VSTS includes a git repository), it is easier to use and better priced.
Chose TeamCity
TeamCity competes against the TFS build, Visual Studio Team services and Jenkins the open source workhorse. The reason for selecting TeamCity was because it was found to be a great fit for all the diverse projects on a spectrum of technologies we have which the TFS Build …
Chose TeamCity
TeamCity by far has the best interface TeamCity still supported our old SubVersion reports as well.
Chose TeamCity
TeamCity is a great on-premise Continuous Integration tool.
Visual Studio Team Services (VSTS) is a hosted SAAS application in Microsoft's Cloud.
VSTS is a Source Code Repository, Build and Release System, and Agile Project Management Platform - whereas TeamCity is a Build and …
Chose TeamCity
I like the quality of Jetbrains products. TeamCity is well supported and regularly updated by Jetbrains. They have an active support forum and most questions are answered quickly.

TeamCity is very extendable and has been able to handle everything we've been required to do.
Chose TeamCity
We've only ever really used TeamCity as a CI platform. Running tests on these CI clusters is worlds more efficient and just plain easier than having to run individual tests on your local machine. You just hit one button here, versus either writing some run script or even worse …
Chose TeamCity
TeamCity is the best combination of price and full features. It has a good web UI and doesn't need a lot of manual configuration files, but it still is incredibly extensible and can do just about any build or release task you set it at. If it can't do it, the odds are it has a …
Chose TeamCity
Jenkins and Team Foundation Server (TFS) are both strong products. Compared to Jenkins, TeamCity is much more mature and polished. Though Jenkins is open-source/free, the cost of TeamCity is a drop in the bucket compared to the total cost of even one project we're using it …
Best Alternatives
Cycloid Platform EngineeringTeamCity
Small Businesses
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitHub
GitHub
Score 9.0 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 7.6 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cycloid Platform EngineeringTeamCity
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cycloid Platform EngineeringTeamCity
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
TeamCity is well suited for an organization using continuous integration, meaning you release code to production often, and an agile project management system. There are free versions available for small teams and enterprise versions available for large teams with many different builds. TeamCity is probably overkill for basic e-commerce or blog website builds that do not require much development after the initial launch
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Fully customizable build process. Each step of the build process can be parameterized and customized to address specific needs of particular applications. This allowed us to easily convert from a custom VM-based environment to our current Docker-based environment.
  • Manages large numbers of build agents seamlessly. This allows us to run multiple builds on many different applications in a most efficient manner.
  • Build steps can be managed in an arbitrary manner, allowing some parts of the process to proceed in parallel while restricting others to depend on completion of all relevant steps.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • It is not plug and play thing
  • Need more specific configurations for smaller projects as well
  • Online help is less available
  • Basic implementation is easy but I think feature add on can be complex as it involve some language knowledge as well.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
TeamCity runs really well, even when sharing a small instance with other applications. The user interface adequately conveys important information without being overly bloated, and it is snappy. There isn't any significant overhead to build agents or unit test runners that we have measured.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Jenkins relies on being open source as the primary driver for its success. This low cost is a huge factor for many companies, both small and large. The professional, free tier of TeamCity offers a huge amount of growth before ever needing to pay anything. I personally also find the user experience of TeamCity to be much better, both from a look and feel, as well as from an out-of-the-box feature set perspective. The big selling feature of ADO is its native integration with Azure. TeamCity integrates very well with out-of-the-box .NET support and greatly simplifies our use of another diverse tooling outside of the Microsoft ecosystem.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • TeamCity was a key contributor to our organization's adoption of Agile.
  • TeamCity made it possible to KILL "It works on my laptop" conversations with Developers. If it does not compile in TeamCity - the project is not deployable. TeamCity's easy to use interface made it possible to quickly adopt a "Deploy Only from TeamCity" policy, further ensuring TeamCity Builds were the gold-standard for well-configured source code.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Cycloid Platform Engineering Screenshots

Screenshot of Automation KPI can be tracked from the Dashboard.Screenshot of Creating or changing a service in a cloud provider in a few clicksScreenshot of Cycloid catalog of stacks ready to be used by any user. Can be used to create a custom stack in a few stepsScreenshot of Cloud infrastructure is visualized on a frequently updated graphScreenshot of Advanced knowledge of cloud computing costsScreenshot of Cloud carbon footprint is shown alongside cloud cost data