Cypress.io vs. SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear

Cypress.io

Cypress.io

24 Reviews and Ratings

SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear

SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear

29 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Cypress.io	Score 7.3 out of 10	N/A	Cypress (or Cypress.io, also the name of the company in Atlanta that develops the tool) is a testing tool with the capability to run tests across multiple browsers, that aims to make setting up, writing, running and debugging tests easy.	N/A
SoapUI Open Source	Score 8.6 out of 10	N/A	SoapUI is an open source API testing tool supported by SmartBear's community, supporting functional and performance testing of APIs.	N/A

Pricing

Cypress.io

SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Cypress.io	SoapUI Open Source
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Cypress.io	SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Considered Both Products	Cypress.io Kim Mejares Senior Quality Engineer Chose Cypress.io Execution speed and interactive debugging tool is very easy. you can make changes in the fly and test will run automatically, thus saving more time debugging your code. Can easily be intergrated to to CI/CD pipeline. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cypress.io Easier to use from the start. Back to front workflow integration makes it more fun to use than Selenium. Usable for free other than very expensive Smartbear solutions. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Cypress.io Cypress.io is easy to start with and is independent of other automation tools. Unless we are looking for automating every edge case, Cypress.io can do it without using any plugins. Also, when a test fails, we can travel back to the state in which the test failed (aka time … Incentivized Helpful?	SoapUI Open Source Verified User Anonymous Chose SoapUI Open Source SoapUI Open Source is free, which is good for light use or simple things here and there. There is a Pro version that makes things more user-friendly. I also like that custom code can also be used for doing more complicated tasks. I like that SoapUI can have a process/flow … Incentivized Helpful? JD Jordan Deroubaix Programmer Chose SoapUI Open Source Compared to SoapUI, we have been using "light" tools like RestClient extension in Firefox, or Postman. Compared to Postman, SoapUI is more simple for WSDL / SOAP webservices, as SoapUI generate all envelop, but Postman does not. Incentivized Helpful? Ajay Kumar Software Developer Chose SoapUI Open Source Every application has its own features and UI design but SoapUI is also very good at testing. All features are awesome. Incentivized Helpful?

Best Alternatives
	Cypress.io	SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10	ReadyAPI Score 7.0 out of 10
Enterprises	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10	ReadyAPI Score 7.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Cypress.io	SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	10.0 (0 ratings)	- (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Cypress.io	SoapUI Open Source, supported by SmartBear
Likelihood to Recommend	Automating a test is very easy when you start with Cypress.io. It is extremely easy to set up and use. Also, debugging a failed test is hassle-free because of its time travel feature. We can do both web UI and API testing with Cypress.io and the only prerequisite is some knowledge in Javascript. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	If you are making system upgrade project and you have existing system working and you want to imitate messages that are going in production but without making any data loads or switch it’s very suitable and convenient software. It serves well in manual test scenarios but wouldn’t be as good in case of mass tests. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	autimation of end to end testing of web UI and api Getting insight on failing and passing tests Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	SOAP REST Authentication Incentivized JD Jordan Deroubaix Programmer Read full review
Cons	Support Mobile Automation Can Test in multiple browser. Testing when browser opens multiple tabs and windows this doesnt work. File upload not supported Incentivized Kim Mejares Senior Quality Engineer Read full review	I actually like SoapUI as it is, I have not found things to improve, except for the speed of response is very complex services. Incentivized Abraham García Web Development Manager Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	Highly satisfied and [a] big fan. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered	Execution speed and interactive debugging tool is very easy. you can make changes in the fly and test will run automatically, thus saving more time debugging your code. Can easily be intergrated to to CI/CD pipeline Incentivized Kim Mejares Senior Quality Engineer Read full review	SoapUI Open Source is free, which is good for light use or simple things here and there. There is a Pro version that makes things more user-friendly. I also like that custom code can also be used for doing more complicated tasks. I like that SoapUI can have a process/flow (conditional/loop/waits/etc.) set up for scripting purposes, which is good for beginners and light users. However, I think the user interface has room for improvement. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	It runs faster, thus improves test effeciency Maintenance cost, tool is free and helpfull community is present for support. Though its free tool, initial learning curve still required to understand the tool works and how to fit it in your system. Incentivized Kim Mejares Senior Quality Engineer Read full review	Testing resolves most of the issues in the development phases. User friendliness of the app makes it good. Overall client happiness depends on the clean project, which is possible by testing. Incentivized Ajay Kumar Software Developer Read full review
ScreenShots