D2iQ Mesosphere vs. Mirantis Kubernetes Engine

D2iQ Mesosphere

8 Reviews and Ratings

Mirantis Kubernetes Engine

209 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
D2iQ Mesosphere	Score7.5 out of 10	N/A	D2iQ (formerly Mesosphere) still supports the Mesosphere solution, which is designed for operations at a very large scale. It's powered by DC/OS, a production-proven cloud native platform that runs containers and data services on the same infrastructure. D2iQ rebranded to reflect their change and broadening of focus towards Kubernetes but other services such as Cassandra, Kafka, and Spark. D2iQ also now offers IT professional services in tandem with its products.	N/A
Mirantis Kubernetes Engine	Score9.4 out of 10	N/A	The Mirantis Kubernetes Engine (formerly Docker Enterprise, acquired by Mirantis in November 2019)aims to let users ship code faster. Mirantis Kubernetes Engine gives users one set of APIs and tools to deploy, manage, and observe secure-by-default, certified, batteries-included Kubernetes clusters on any infrastructure: public cloud, private cloud, or bare metal.	$500 per year per node

Pricing

D2iQ Mesosphere

Mirantis Kubernetes Engine

No answers on this topic

Free: $0.00
per year
Basic: $500.00
per year

Pricing Offerings
D2iQ Mesosphere	Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

No setup fee

No setup fee

—

These pricing options are compatible with Linux or Windows Server and are per year, per node. The basic version requires maximum online purchase not to exceed 50 nodes. Support/professional services are not included.

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	D2iQ Mesosphere	Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
Considered Both Products	D2iQ Verified User Chose D2iQ Mesosphere Mesosphere vs. ECS Mesosphere has a direct competition with companies using AWS Cloud, as the ECS product is one of the closest competitors to Mesosphere. Mesosphere has an edge with simplistic hosting and deep and easy integration with Jenkins Pipelines and native plugins … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose D2iQ Mesosphere I happen to like mesosphere because it integrates well with a Jenkins based workflow, Deis is a little more Heroku like and it's not clear how to fit that model into a continuous-integration process. Kubernetes has also been criticized for being complicated. Incentivized Helpful?	Mirantis Verified User Chose Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Docker is a different beast in that it is not trying to solve all of your infrastructure problems or most of them, it is simply trying to provide a reliable container serviced based on linux containers in which you can easily and quickly deploy microservices. LXD does provide … Incentivized Helpful? Willian Molinari Tech lead in Information Technology at Locaweb (Internet, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Docker and VirtualBox are not the same things, but many people tend to use virtual machines as a development environment. Using Docker to that means, you can have a lightweight isolation framework. As I said, it's not the same thing, but if you create your application following … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	D2iQ Mesosphere	Mirantis Kubernetes Engine
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (2 ratings)	8.3 (37 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	9.1 (1 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (2 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	7.8 (3 ratings)