D3 Security vs. Arcsight by OpenText

D3 is clearly tailoring their approach to large organizations with a significant geographical footprint who are largely in need of a tool that provides robust analytics and activity graphing to analyze productivity and supervisory efficiency at the executive level. However, small to medium-sized organizations and those with narrow geographical footprints may find the investment vastly more expensive than the return. The implementation of minimum purchasing guidelines means that smaller departments will be forced into purchasing tools they have little to no use for, and medium-size departments will be paying a high price for features they do find helpful but could get elsewhere for a substantially lower price. Additionally, small to medium-sized users may find that D3's focus on large organizational level tools is less helpful than some smaller competitor's software which provides a number of capabilities with more operational relevance for environments like office buildings, college campuses, university police departments, and housing associations. Overall, I would recommend D3 to large organizations who have need of the advanced tools included in their more expensive modules. The lack of some smaller levels of customization, 1st line operational features, and the high-end user interface is less important at that level of implementation.

Incentivized

In the current lot of hundreds of SIEM solutions out there in the market, ArcSight ESM is fairly less expensive with strong fundamentals in place. The log ingestion, correlation are very well performing and totally worth ROI. However, the tool has lost its way when it comes to staying abreast with current feature curve of SIEM technology and the evolution has not been done by MicroFocus. Search times are high and there is no major plug-in that has been introduced as part of the product life cycle.

Incentivized

• Incident detection, neutralization, and speed are all handled by this software.
• The price is good.
• Fast and Automated response to threats.

Incentivized

• User friendly interface.
• Easy to create queries and rules to make all the things automatic.
• Backup, maintenance and support of this product are always nearly perfect.

Incentivized

• A lack of documentation of the administrative interface.
• Additional training is needed to take advantage of all of the features.
• Remediation and post-incident activities are not supported.

Incentivized

• ArcSight is a really complex tool, but it's not that easy to implement and maintain.
• Troubleshooting issues on ArcSight can be hard if you have a large environment.

Incentivized

Overall, it is a good investment in order for an organization to stay compliant and stay secure from all the wild things happening. It is definitely a cost effective tool with some good features including correlation, log storage, reporting and dashboards. If a customer is looking for advanced set of features, then I would highly not recommend this.

Incentivized

If you go for platinum support, it's good as you have priority for support. They will take remote control of your machines and troubleshoot. Also, they arrange requirement SEM depending on the issue.

Incentivized

We are currently using Elastic search as well for better management of our devices and to keep all the loopholes filled that have been created around the non-upgraded version of Arcsight Enterprise Manager. Elastic searches have the latest mechanism to fetch logs and correlated data, as well as process them in a more useful way.

Incentivized

• Business is secured
• ROI is okay for now.
• We are satisfied.

Incentivized

• It is recommended for handle small enterprises.
• Cant integrate any threat intel tool so we majorly works through filters.
• It is slow takes time for large searches.

Incentivized