Dancing Numbers vs. Okta Workflows

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Dancing Numbers
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Dancing Numbers is a platform that aims to make importing, exporting, and deleting the data in QuickBooks account easier. Dancing Numbers also offers pro advisors who are present 365 days.
$199
per year per user
Okta Workflows
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Azuqua was a tool that helped users integrate their SaaS applications and build custom automations. It was acquired by Okta in late 2019, and is now part of Okta Workflows. Okta Workflows leverages Azuqua’s workflow orchestration engine and application integrations to automate complex identity-centric processes such as user onboarding and offboarding. The product is available as part of the Okta Lifecycle Management…N/A
Pricing
Dancing NumbersOkta Workflows
Editions & Modules
Importer, Exporter, and Deleter
$199
per year per user
Importer, Exporter, and Deleter
$199
per year per user
Accountant Basic
$499
per year Unlimited
Accountant Basic
$499
per year Unlimited
Accountant Pro
$899
per year Unlimited
Accountant Pro
$899
per year Unlimited
Accountant Premium
$1,999
per year Unlimited
Accountant Premium
$1,999
per year Unlimited
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Dancing NumbersOkta Workflows
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Dancing NumbersOkta Workflows
Considered Both Products
Dancing Numbers

No answer on this topic

Okta Workflows
Chose Okta Workflows
I think Okta is so much more complete and FUB is more only sales oriented instead of Customer Service, with Okta you can call, chat, get in contact internally with other departments, and do different things to solve customer issue.
Chose Okta Workflows
We have not used other products similar to Okta.
Chose Okta Workflows
I evaluated Zapier and Microsoft Flow before coming across Azuqua. Zapier was too simplistic and didn't allow for transfer of enough variables. The price point also didn't work for the value it could provide. Microsoft Flow couldn't make the connection with Smartsheet, and I …
Chose Okta Workflows
Stampley - on the surface they look similar, but I came across this alternative after integrating with Azuqua so I haven't fully evaluated it against Azuqua.
Chose Okta Workflows
None, Azuqua seemed to do what we needed.
Chose Okta Workflows
Azuqua handles multi-stream processes very well, however provides some nuances with connecting data.
Chose Okta Workflows
Zapier primarily, I prefer the workflow creation in Azuqua. The UI is very user friendly.
Chose Okta Workflows
I have used Mulesoft, Workato, my own code and in past years heavyweight data (e.g. ETL) platforms along with a number of bus technologies. In this case, I was looking for the cloud-based approach that matches our strategy of being totally cloud-focused along with simpler …
Chose Okta Workflows
Azuqua was the first application we assessed for our purposes, and served our needs so well that we felt no need to search further. It gave us the solutions we needed in a way that was easy to set up and maintain, and the support we received was above and beyond expectations, …
Chose Okta Workflows
I had to use the Automate tool for funneling image assets in bulk (tens of thousands) from FTPs into various destinations on an eCommerce platform. The user interface was quite harsh in comparison to Azuqua. Far more text/code line driven.
Chose Okta Workflows
Azuqua offered the most customization of the other platforms we tried. While it was comparably intuitive to use, in terms of entry level, Azuqua maintained this intuitiveness at higher levels of sophistication/integration whereas the other platforms either lacked the same logic …
Chose Okta Workflows
Azuqua was more intuitive.
Chose Okta Workflows
IFTTT / Zapier - There really isn't a comparison as Azuqua allows for full customization of your flows and IFTTT and Zapier do not.

Talend Open Studio is built more for doing database / file integrations and it can do API calls. Talend is much bigger but cannot accomplish what …
Chose Okta Workflows
We have not used another tool besides Azuqua to help us solve these business needs.
Chose Okta Workflows
Smartsheet notifications is the main competitor for what we use Azuqua for. When we got Azuqua, there was no competitor and Smartsheet actually recommended it as the solution. Now, we split up the work between the 2 tools and use Smartsheet for the easier notifications and …
Chose Okta Workflows
Easy to build out complex if/then scenarios and fire of multiple other workflows within one workflow. Like the UI of seeing how data is being utilizes, ported, and manipulated across the workflows. Also like the workflow history for optimization as well as troubleshooting. Raw …
Chose Okta Workflows
I evaluated another platform, but I can't recall their name.

ServiceRocket didn't work. I tried to integrate with them, but it was a mess and a waste of time. The other platform was 10x as expensive at Azuqua.
Chose Okta Workflows
Azuqua was the only product we looked at in this space.
Features
Dancing NumbersOkta Workflows
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Dancing Numbers
9.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Okta Workflows
-
Ratings
Dashboards8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Dancing Numbers
5.3
Ratings
30% below category average
Okta Workflows
-
Ratings
Process designer8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process simulation3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Business rules engine3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
SOA support9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Process player7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Model execution2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Business Process Automation
Comparison of Business Process Automation features of Product A and Product B
Dancing Numbers
2.0
Ratings
101% below category average
Okta Workflows
-
Ratings
Business Process Modeling2.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Dancing NumbersOkta Workflows
Small Businesses
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Dancing NumbersOkta Workflows
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Dancing NumbersOkta Workflows
Likelihood to Recommend
Dancing Numbers is ideal for small to medium-sized businesses needing an easy-to-use, cost-effective accounting solution, particularly during transitions from manual bookkeeping or other software. It’s especially useful for firms with basic accounting needs or limited expertise, offering automation for routine tasks. However, it may not be suitable for large enterprises with complex financial operations, businesses requiring advanced customization, or those in highly regulated industries. It also might fall short for companies with extensive international operations or high transaction volumes.
Read full review
The integration I used Azuqua for was based on Salesforce, Wrike and Office 365. I found the integration of Salesforce reasonably straightforward, Wrike was limited in the "cards" capability but functional (there are bugs but there are also workarounds but they required assistance from the Azuqua support team) and Office 365 was quite immature (primarily around Excel bugs but also email was limited).
Read full review
Pros
  • Bulk Data Import
  • Bulk Data Export
  • Bulk Data Delete
  • Data Conversion
  • Software Integration
Read full review
  • The best part about Azuqua is that you do not need to write code. You do however need to have an understanding of logic and how the software works. This happens to fit me perfectly as someone with basic programming experience.
  • Their Support is second to none. Not only are they extremely quick and responsive, but their answers are never canned responses and always provide valuable content.
  • They seem to take feedback seriously and will continue to evolve and make a better product.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • I think it requires an easy way to migrate flows created from one user to then move the ownership to another user. It happened to us that one of our engineers left the company and he had the Azuqua account and flows. It required quite some time, cases and telephone calls to do the migration to my account.
Read full review
Usability
I’ve been using Dancing Numbers for a few months now, and overall, it’s been a great experience. The platform is user-friendly and intuitive, making it relatively easy to navigate even for someone with a moderate level of accounting knowledge. The automated data entry and reconciliation features are particularly helpful, saving us a significant amount of time and reducing manual errors.The integration with various accounting systems is a big plus, allowing us to seamlessly connect with our existing tools. Customer support has been responsive and helpful whenever we’ve had questions or needed assistance.However, there are a few areas where Dancing Numbers could improve. While the core functionalities are strong, some advanced features feel a bit limited compared to competitors. Additionally, the pricing structure could be more flexible to accommodate different business sizes and needs.Overall, Dancing Numbers is a solid choice for businesses looking to streamline their accounting processes with a reliable tool, though there’s room for enhancement in certain areas.
Read full review
The system is working as it should, keeping our programs safe from outside hackers. Helping us keep our passwords safe, convenient and already ready to get us logged into the program securely and quickly. Verification that only authorized users are able to access our company's programs. Okta Workflows (Azuqua) is a very good system that has helped our company greatly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
I evaluated Zapier and Microsoft Flow before coming across Azuqua. Zapier was too simplistic and didn't allow for transfer of enough variables. The price point also didn't work for the value it could provide. Microsoft Flow couldn't make the connection with Smartsheet, and I was unable to get Microsoft support or Smartsheet support to assist me with the issue.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Increased time savings. We could not function as a matter of daily business if we did not have a tool to automate project folders (and complementary workflow management profiles) for the thousands of projects that flow through daily.
  • Opens up a greater understanding of all the silos and divisions within the company infrastructure and tests secure means to link those groups safely and share information.
  • Opens up the chance to communicate with other API information sources if our company is doing a partnership with another organization. Granted everything is square with IT security.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Dancing Numbers Screenshots

Screenshot of