Dataiku vs. Pytorch

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Dataiku
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
The Dataiku platform unifies all data work, from analytics to Generative AI. It can modernize enterprise analytics and accelerate time to insights with visual, cloud-based tooling for data preparation, visualization, and workflow automation.N/A
Pytorch
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Pytorch is an open source machine learning (ML) framework boasting a rich ecosystem of tools and libraries that extend PyTorch and support development in computer vision, NLP and or that supports other ML goals.N/A
Pricing
DataikuPytorch
Editions & Modules
Discover
Contact sales team
Business
Contact sales team
Enterprise
Contact sales team
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DataikuPytorch
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DataikuPytorch
Considered Both Products
Dataiku
Chose Dataiku
Strictly for Data Science operations, Anaconda can be considered as a subset of Dataiku DSS. While Anaconda supports Python and R programming languages, Dataiku also provides this facility, but also provides GUI to creates models with just a click of a button. This provides the …
Chose Dataiku
Open source availability is a critical factor given licensing cost of other platforms and budget reasons. Secondly, the available features in the community version covers most of the use cases, thus making it comparable or even outdo commercial versions of other software. …
Chose Dataiku
Anaconda is mainly used by professional data scientists who have profound knowledge of Python coding, mainly used for building some new algorithm block or some optimization, then the module will be integrated into the Dataiku pipeline/workflow. While Dataiku can be used by …
Pytorch
Chose Pytorch
Tensorflow without Keras is not a pleasant experience; when using Keras, it is pretty nice, but it feels more opinionated than PyTorch; one is less free, which is not an issue in industrial settings with classic workflow but can be an issue in research settings. JAX is great …
Chose Pytorch
Saving and loading Machine/Deep Learning models is very easy with Pytorch. It provides visualization capabilities when combined with Tensorboard, and mathematical operations are highly optimized. Easy to understand for a person who is an expert in Python. It takes significantly …
Chose Pytorch
Pytorch is very, very simple compared to Tensorflow. Simple to install, less dependency issues, and very small learning curve. Tensorflow is very much optimised for robust deployment but very complicated to train simple models and play around with the loss functions. It needs a …
Chose Pytorch
As I described in previous statements, Pytorch is much better suited than Tensorflow from a software development look. This Pythonic idea was then taken and repeated by all the other frameworks.

You can get to better performance models by better understanding the deep learning …
Chose Pytorch
The syntax of PyTorch is much better in my opinion, and the programming style is more pythonic and easier to use. I also think PyTorch is a lot easier to debug than the competitors I've listed (caffe2 and tensorflow). I do like some of the examples given on tensorflows website, …
Features
DataikuPytorch
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Dataiku
9.1
Ratings
8% above category average
Pytorch
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
MDM Integration6.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Dataiku
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
Pytorch
-
Ratings
Visualization9.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Dataiku
10.0
Ratings
20% above category average
Pytorch
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Transformations10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Encryption10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Built-in Processors10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Dataiku
8.7
Ratings
4% above category average
Pytorch
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools5.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Dataiku
9.0
Ratings
5% above category average
Pytorch
-
Ratings
Flexible Model Publishing Options9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
DataikuPytorch
Small Businesses
Jupyter Notebook
Jupyter Notebook
Score 9.4 out of 10
InterSystems IRIS
InterSystems IRIS
Score 7.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
Posit
Posit
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DataikuPytorch
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DataikuPytorch
Likelihood to Recommend
I would recommend it because it's an amazing tool for different levels of users. From Business Analysts to Data Scientists to Managers, various employees can make use of this tool to make data-driven decisions. I'm not sure about where it would be less appropriate as I'm using it as Data Scientist and so far it pretty much caters to my need.
Read full review
Everything deep learning related if not on TPU (in such case, JAX would be better suited). For LLM deployment, libraries such as vLLM would be better suited, too; otherwise, wrapping the PyTorch model with Ray is a good option.
Read full review
Pros
  • Very intuitive and easy to use UI, making a lot of types of users can collaborate with each other easily, by visualizing the same workflow.
  • Many building blocks can be reused immediately, avoid a lot of non-standard boiler plate implementation.
  • Data pre-analysis and feature engineering assistance increase the productivity as well as the efficiency of data scientists.
  • Many data connectors support wide range of data storage, from SQL, TeraData, Hadoop Hive, etc.
  • Support from research till final MaaS solution deployment.
Read full review
  • Provides Benchmark datasets to test your custom algorithm
  • Provides with a lot of pre-coded neural net components to use for your flow
  • Gives a framework to write really abstract code.
Read full review
Cons
  • Its community support is very limited at the moment
  • Complex to integrate with automation tools such as Blue Prism
Read full review
  • It should have support for Java also as Java is one of the most popular language.
  • They should make things more easy if we want to use GPUs for computation.
  • They should keep adding the latest models so that we can easily load them for use for further fine-tuning.
Read full review
Usability
As I have described earlier, the intuitiveness of this tool makes it great as well as the variety of users that can use this tool. Also, the plugins available in their repository provide solutions to various data science problems.
Read full review
The big advantage of PyTorch is how close it is to the algorithm. Oftentimes, it is easier to read Pytorch code than a given paper directly. I particularly like the object-oriented approach in model definition; it makes things very clean and easy to teach to software engineers.
Read full review
Support Rating
The open source user community is friendly, helpful, and responsive, at times even outdoing commercial software vendors. Documentation is also top notch, and usually resolves issues without the need for human interactions. Great product design, with a focus on user experience, also makes platform use intuitive, thus reducing the need for explicit support.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Strictly for Data Science operations, Anaconda can be considered as a subset of Dataiku DSS. While Anaconda supports Python and R programming languages, Dataiku also provides this facility, but also provides GUI to creates models with just a click of a button. This provides the flexibility to users who do not wish to alter the model hyperparameters in greater depths. Writing codes to extract meaningful data is time consuming compared to Dataiku's ability to perform feature engineering and data transformation through click of a button.
Read full review
Saving and loading Machine/Deep Learning models is very easy with Pytorch. It provides visualization capabilities when combined with Tensorboard, and mathematical operations are highly optimized. Easy to understand for a person who is an expert in Python. It takes significantly less time to create valuable POCs as most of the things are inbuilt.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Given its open source status, only cost is the learning curve, which is minimal compared to time savings for data exploration.
  • Platform also ease tracking of data processing workflow, unlike Excel.
  • Build-in data visualizations covers many use cases with minimal customization; time saver.
Read full review
  • Less time wasted on handling the library version issues
  • Small learning curve as very similar to Python
  • Compatibility with other popular Python libraries makes it easy to build a lot of things on it
Read full review
ScreenShots