Degreed is a workforce upskilling platform boasting users among one in three Fortune 50
companies. It connects learning, talent development, and
internal mobility opportunities to intelligence on the skills a business needs next. Degreed packages the capabilities in what the vendor provides as a simple, fluid,
skill-building experience that’s powered by the user's own people’s expertise and
interests to transform the workforce from within. Degreed is a learning…
N/A
PeopleFluent
Score 7.9 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
PeopleFluent includes modules for recruiting, performance management, compensation, learning, succession, and vendor management, as well as workforce planning and diversity. These modules can be purchased separately or bundled, and integrate with other HR systems.
N/A
Pricing
Degreed
PeopleFluent
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Degreed
PeopleFluent
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Degreed for Enterprise provides SaaS based pricing with annual contracts aligned to an organization's size. Degreed is free for individuals.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Degreed
PeopleFluent
Considered Both Products
Degreed
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Degreed
We did enough research to figure that Degreed was better. We did a free demo with both and decided to go with Degreed based on reviews and the way their system worked. The website is also easier to use, and more user-friendly. We do not regret our decision to have chosen Degreed.
Senior Enterprise Account Development II - Team Lead
Chose Degreed
I think that in a business setting, Degreed is more streamlined to benefit us than almost any other tool. Canvas is great in higher/lower education where the learning is the actual product. In a business setting, tools like Degreed and Bridge do a wonderful job helping our …
We wanted to bring in the function of the manager interaction from our requirements as other ATS are kind of static and sometimes the updates are delayed. This down time would cost our speed to market since there was a clog with the updates. I want to say it stacks up fairly …
We already had a relationship with peoplefluent and were offered assistance through implementation and deployment. We couldn't walk away from our current vendor.
Out of the VMS's listed, I'd say PeopleFluent is solidly in the middle. Fieldglass and IQN are probably easier to navigate and more modern looking, and I definitely don't run into the login problems with them. Beeline and PRO Wand are probably on par with PeopleFluent. They …
PeopleFluent had an easier degree of use in screening and Talent Acquisition than others I have used. I would highly recommend PeopleFluent. It takes minimal training and can quickly get it up and running.
Its great, its very versatile and stacks up very well against the competition. In terms of usability and ease of use, anyone can quickly learn how to use PeopleFluent. Again, the faults against the system would be when a client who is running the tool customizes it to their …
I like the ease of Peoplefluent and I like how we can have questions for certain areas to screen candidates before considering to bring them in for an interview.
In my opinion Peoplefluent better fit our needs for flexibility and "total package". Peoplefluent's Compensation, Performance and Succession platforms work quite well with each other. Additionally the administrative features and requirements are easy to grasp and very flexible.
Features
Degreed
PeopleFluent
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
Degreed
8.5
Ratings
4% above category average
PeopleFluent
5.8
Ratings
20% below category average
Course authoring
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Course catalog or library
8.00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Player/Portal
10.00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Learning content
9.20 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Mobile friendly
10.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Progress tracking & certifications
8.30 Ratings
00 Ratings
Assignments
8.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Compliance management
10.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Learning administration
8.00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Learning reporting & analytics
4.40 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Social learning
7.40 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Degreed
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
8.0
Ratings
9% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
00 Ratings
8.00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
Degreed
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
8.2
Ratings
14% above category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
9.00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Degreed
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
6.5
Ratings
1% below category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Plan weighting
00 Ratings
4.00 Ratings
Manager note taking
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
00 Ratings
5.00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Degreed
-
Ratings
PeopleFluent
6.3
Ratings
9% below category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
7.00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
6.00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Degreed is a software that is undoubtedly worth integrating in companies that plan or require the teaching of new topics and material to their employees. This platform is very easy to use, the interface is easy to use and provides detailed information on the learning that each of the employees has had, these learning details can be viewed by accessing the profile section of each employee. Degreed allows you to share strategic material with employees in the form of a "playlist" so that they can learn in an order of all the information. In addition, it allows you to create all kinds of certifications to provide employees with certificates based on behavior, evidence and approvers. These three certification phases make it possible to verify the information learned by the employee, in addition, they allow it to be known how much he has learned and what skills he has developed during that learning period. Without a doubt, Degreed is the best option for all companies that want to add learning content for their employees.
PeopleFluent has eliminated the use of paper reviews. It is also eliminated the use of scanning, emailing or interoffice mail. It is a great tool for communication and I highly recommend it. However, in some ways, the product can be improved. Some processes are tied to each other and could function in tandem. For example, while completing the self-review, the employee has to capture multi-raters. If self-review is submitted without listing multi-rater names then multi-rater review has to be captured separately on paper. In my opinion, these two processes can be different. Multi-raters should be added/removed/modified after submitting self-review.
I would advise better filtering options when pulling up candidate profiles, we should have multiple functions when requesting candidates profile.
Sometimes I get huge projects and need to move more than 20 people, it's a headache moving groups in parts.
A faster way to verify if a candidate has been double submitted, maybe with a unique ID or email that identifies said candidate prior to going through the whole submission process.
Stronger cache cookies when session is timed out get kicked out and the process reboots. Sometimes recruiters are pulled in different directions while multitasking.
PeopleFluent continues to develop an already high quality product and works to continually improve the user experience. The different modules integrate well, and the administrative functions are easy to understand and perform resulting in less time spent with KTLO functions. They provide world class customer service and work hard to keep you engaged as a customer.
PeopleFluent seems to have all the functionality one would need, but it can be a bit overwhelming. Depending on the client implementation, it can be downright confusing and not intuitive. My 6 rating comes from the fact that it seems like the system can be configured to actually be confusing and not make sense. I think a VMS should be set up not to allow a customer to configure it in such a way as to not really work, or to allow users to circumvent steps. I also really don't like the "organization key" that needs to be entered every time you log in. Why is a login and password good enough for 99% of the systems out there, but PeopleFluent requires an extra field?
While it's great for the management and tracking of employees learning, there is still room for growth. It could use more courses and content developed by Degreed rather than relying on external platforms content.
In my experience, the support team was very prompt and helpful. They had good subject matter expertise and were able to troubleshoot immediately. At times we wanted some enhancements but it was not possible due to product limitations. But, the support team was helpful in suggesting alternatives for our requirements. The customer support staff was also very polite and friendly.
We did enough research to figure that Degreed was better. We did a free demo with both and decided to go with Degreed based on reviews and the way their system worked. The website is also easier to use, and more user-friendly. We do not regret our decision to have chosen Degreed.
Out of the VMS's listed, I'd say PeopleFluent is solidly in the middle. Fieldglass and IQN are probably easier to navigate and more modern looking, and I definitely don't run into the login problems with them. Beeline and PRO Wand are probably on par with PeopleFluent. They have their plusses and minuses in terms of navigation and ease of use. Covendis is definitely worse than PeopleFluent. Covendis is a mess - very difficult to navigate, not intuitive at all with terrible workflow. Again, I didn't select PeopleFluent; my client did, and I have chosen to work with them, therefore I work with PeopleFluent.
I do believe that goal setting and the workflow of following up, going through the process yearly is as good as you make it. If you set good goals, or help your team make good goals then the experience can go well. Otherwise it's just another thing that an employee is doing to make their manager happy.
I am not sure the cost of the product, but if it is really expensive I am not sure that we are getting fully what we should be for what the product offers. Make sure you are using what is offered.