DemandScience

DemandScience

131 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
DemandScience	Score9.8 out of 10	N/A	DemandScience is a data-driven marketing platform that offers lead generation and data services that accelerate the technology sales process by identifying intent among technology buyers. Founded in 2009, DemandScience helps marketers meet the ever-changing demands of B2B sales.	N/A

Pricing

DemandScience

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
DemandScience
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

No setup fee

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	DemandScience
Considered Both Products	DemandScience Verified User Chose DemandScience Demand Science was less expensive when quoting cost per lead than Tech Target. Other than that, the program sounded almost the same. I selected Demand Science because I was price sensitive while trying to test whether the tactic of content syndication was effective for us. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose DemandScience Mainly in the flexibility of targeting Incentivized Helpful? Erika James Campaign Manager in Marketing at Iron Mountain (Writing & Editing, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose DemandScience I am super happy with the campaign management Incentivized Helpful? Tobias Weiß Senior Account Manager (B2B) in Marketing at iProspect GmbH (Marketing & Advertising, 10,001+ employees) Chose DemandScience DS has a huge database and therefore lead count within the niche audiences and industries. Many other lead partners are specialized in one industry. DS is capable of delivering in multiple industries, which is awesome if you target different target audiences as well. There is a … Incentivized Helpful? Roderick McMillan Senior Marketing Manager UK in Marketing at Monster Worldwide (Human Resources, 501-1000 employees) Chose DemandScience Over the past year we've utilised a variety of content syndicators, approximately six or seven in total, as we believe in maintaining a diversified mix of suppliers to ensure comprehensive and well-rounded marketing efforts. While all these platforms have their individual … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose DemandScience I've only used DemandScience for content syndication. Incentivized Helpful? LaRessa Cox VP Marketing in Marketing at Buchanan Technologies (Information Technology & Services, 501-1000 employees) Chose DemandScience I've not used another content syndication company, and I probably won't after the lack of results we've had. I have used direct email organizations, and they are stronger but also more expensive, so you have to weigh your priorities. I could see if you were selling a specific … Incentivized Helpful? Belén García Senior Demand Generation Manager in Marketing at Urban Sports Club (Sports, 201-500 employees) Chose DemandScience Demand Science has the largest audience in our target groups, which is exactly what we need, as we always require high volumes of leads. They are also very good when it comes to account management, we always feel that they are there for us, and if we ever have any issue, they … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose DemandScience We have used other media vendors from the likes of Madison Logic, Inbox Insight etc. However, it has been the direct feedback from the client, great customer service and competitive CPL rates that have influenced our choice. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose DemandScience I would say it is similar to Madison Logic when it comes to the quality of leads and customer service. We are yet to see results coming from GumGum's contextual approach but from a content syndication perspective they are one of the more reliable ones out there, especially for … Incentivized Helpful? Lauren Vasu Marketing Manager in Marketing at Alteryx (Computer Software, 1001-5000 employees) Chose DemandScience We have used Tech Target in the past which is much more expensive than Demand Science but lead quality is the same across both vendors Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose DemandScience Similar offering to other content syndication offerings. Of 12 tested partners in the last year, DS ranked 7th in Opportunity Rate and 4th on CPL rate. Incentivized Helpful? Rajiv Chidambaram, BE, MBA Demand Generation Manager in Marketing at iManage (Information Technology and Services, 1001-5000 employees) Chose DemandScience DemandScience is a good tool, but doesn't measure up to some other more tech-oriented content syndication players. Taboola is an excellent tool that has a very good user interface to set up the launch and monitor campaigns. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose DemandScience DemandScience is easy to use. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose DemandScience Demand Science's communication skills through email against the ones selected is great! when it comes to getting preview links to go live in the markets they are quick to generate these. As well as getting them amended as per our request, we never have any issues with this … Incentivized Helpful? Jane Clarke Digital Director in Marketing at Avantra (Computer Software, 51-200 employees) Chose DemandScience None Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose DemandScience All vendors have their strengths and weaknesses. Due to the scale of activity we do on behalf of our clients, we tend to always use a basket of vendors to deliver the lead volumes we require. DemandScience is always on the preferred partner list and will thus be considered for … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose DemandScience Again, the main draw to DemandScience was primarily the Scale available across all markets we attempted to target and garner leads from. Incentivized Helpful? Ying Cui Chen Digital Activation Manager in Marketing at HP (Consumer Electronics, 10,001+ employees) Chose DemandScience DemandScience has better leads quality Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose DemandScience Good for quality appointment setting, poor against content syndication. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose DemandScience DemandScience is on the more preferred half of vendors due to their negotiated CPLs and willingness to step up to the plate. Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

Features

DemandScience

Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of DemandScience
Feature	DemandScience 7.8 17 Ratings
Audience profiling and targeting	8.617 Ratings
Content performance analytics	7.614 Ratings
Campaign optimization dashboard	7.210 Ratings

User Ratings
	DemandScience
Likelihood to Recommend	7.6 (75 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	6.0 (2 ratings)
Usability	6.9 (3 ratings)
Support Rating	5.0 (69 ratings)
Implementation Rating	1.5 (3 ratings)