Apache Derby vs. RaimaDB

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Derby
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Apache Derby is an embedded relational database management system, originally developed by IBM and called IBM Cloudscape.N/A
RaimaDB
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
The Raima Database Manager (RDM) from Raima Inc in Seattle, Washington is a relational database management system.N/A
Pricing
Apache DerbyRaimaDB
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache DerbyRaimaDB
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache DerbyRaimaDB
Considered Both Products
Apache Derby
Chose Apache Derby
SQLite is another open-source zero-cost file-based SQL-capable database solution and is a good alternative to Apache Derby, especially for non-Java-based solutions. We chose Apache Derby as it is Java-based, and so is the solution we embedded it in. However, SQLite has a …
Chose Apache Derby
For our particular use case, Apache was selected for its ease of use, in its ability to be installed, configured and embedded in our in-house application.
RaimaDB
Chose RaimaDB
RDM performs way better than SQLite when the database is larger and has multiple users.
Best Alternatives
Apache DerbyRaimaDB
Small Businesses
SQLite
SQLite
Score 9.6 out of 10
SQLite
SQLite
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
SQLite
SQLite
Score 9.6 out of 10
SQLite
SQLite
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
SQLite
SQLite
Score 9.6 out of 10
SQLite
SQLite
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache DerbyRaimaDB
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache DerbyRaimaDB
Likelihood to Recommend
Derby is absolutely the best when it comes to needing a small, embeddable RDBMS in your applications. Certain jobs, like Risk Modeling, are perfect for a database that is small enough to fit into memory with no trouble then store data from various sources, and then allow a user to access those data sets quickly.
Read full review
Works very well in applications designed for IoT devices where performance and footprint are of great importance.
Read full review
Pros
  • Embedded SQL-capable database client and server
  • Good performance for a file-based database
  • Zero cost open source solution
Read full review
  • First of all the performance of RDM was superior compared to SQLite in my multi-user environment (about 200 users). The pricing was surprisingly good compared to other high-performance databases.
  • Decreased time to market, a faster and more performant application overall and lower maintenance costs.
  • They run on most RTOS and can be used in a cross-platform environment.
Read full review
Cons
  • Not as well positioned in the market as the "big dogs" (Oracle, MSSQL)
  • Been around awhile, and not a lot of exposure. This I believe is primarily due to it's relation to the Apache Project (which is not bad, but they don't force big, lumbering corporate volume licensing on you), and thus people are a bit gun-shy about NOT throwing money at something
  • Java is still "slow" compared to C/C++, thus making Derby a bit slow too
Read full review
  • I would like to see REST API with a GUI for administration
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
SQLite is another open-source zero-cost file-based SQL-capable database solution and is a good alternative to Apache Derby, especially for non-Java-based solutions. We chose Apache Derby as it is Java-based, and so is the solution we embedded it in. However, SQLite has a similar feature set and is widely used in the industry to serve the same purposes for native solutions such as C or C++-based products.
Read full review
RDM performs way better than SQLite when the database is larger and has multiple users.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Saved money on database licensing.
Read full review
  • Decreased time to market
  • Decreased maintenance and service costs on hardware.
Read full review
ScreenShots