TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

DevExpress Universal vs. Progress Kendo UI

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    DevExpress Universal

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/ADevExpress Universal is a suite of all DevExpress .NET products and controls.N/A

    Progress Kendo UI

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AKendo UI is a JavaScript UI toolkit that allows users to build responsive web-based apps integrated into their framework of choice (jQuery, Angular, React, or Vue). The vendor’s value proposition is that Kendo UI offers a large library of popular and configurable components ranging from sophisticated grids and charts to basic buttons, so users don’t have to waste development time building their UI. The vendor also says the large library of customizable themes means users can easily deploy a…

    $999

    per developer, royalty-free

    Pricing
    DevExpress UniversalProgress Kendo UI
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Kendo UI with Priority Support
    $999
    per developer, royalty-free
    DevCraft UI
    $1,299
    per developer, royalty-free
    DevCraft Complete
    $1,499
    per developer, royalty-free
    DevCraft Ultimate
    $2,199
    per developer, royalty-free
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    DevExpress UniversalProgress Kendo UI
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    DevExpress UniversalProgress Kendo UI
    Considered Both Products
    DevExpress
    Chose DevExpress Universal
    DevExpress Universal controls are much simpler to use, implement and customized as compared to Kendo. Learning curve for telerik is high, though level of customization that can be achieved with telerik exceeds that of DevExpress Universal.

    Found DevExpress Universal community …
    Incentivized
    Progress Software
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    Kendo UI and the Telerik suite covered more of the technologies and platforms that we were working in (i.e. WinForms, MVC).
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    Kendo is more configurable. It has a great support base and community. It's well suited to integrate with ASP.NET MVC. It's well suited to integrate with AngularJS. You can create generic and dynamic controls which are configurable. With grids it provides higher …
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    Kendo has better and more friendly tools.
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    We previously used DevExpress, and it was fine. We were embarking on a large project, and more people were familiar with Kendo than DevExpress, so we decided to standardize the platform with Kendo and move in that direction across all our work. It has been a fine …
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    Kendo UI was selected for the price and easy implementation, so that was the priority in the moment. Again, it is a good product for small and mediums developments. But when an app is growing, Kendo UI will start to have performance problems, but we are grateful for this …
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    It seems that Kendo UI is most complete tool of the market. Moreover, the documentation and examples seems to be better than other competitors. They always tries to bring the best in class UIs, even with new overcoming technologies. Rarely I see a bug in the system, that brings …
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    Kendo UI and DevExpress are very similar controls libraries. They both have the same goal in mind and both get the job done. I believe Kendo UI is superior due to the extensive collection of code examples and available documentation. I would also say that Kendo UI beats out …
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    At the time of our product selection we identified better cross-browser compatibility and we estimated that turnaround for support was superior. At the time, the vendor had a higher positive feedback footprint among their user community.
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    I'll be honest, we never really did a "bake off" when evaluating UI components. I think initially we had a need for a solution and at the time Kendo UI was a good fit. Once we got it in house it grew organically as projects were developed and delivered. So not sure if there …
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    Telerik ASP.NET controls have a significant advantage over DevExpress -- automated web tests, rich API for testing web pages containing Telerik controls. Telerik also has less strict license terms: - Telerik software is licensed on a per-seat basis - DevExpress software is …
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    The licensing is better in Kendo. Developer Express Universal prohibits developing Report Server competitors for example.
    Incentivized
    Chose Progress Kendo UI
    The price/features available (development platforms available, controls available for ASP MVC development, etc.) seemed to be a better choice.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    DevExpress UniversalProgress Kendo UI
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (5 ratings)
    8.2
    (177 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.8
    (21 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (38 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.5
    (38 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.1
    (9 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)