DHTMLX vs. Ignite UI

DHTMLX is an excellent choice for incorporating complex components into your website or platform. Its versatility and customization options make it suitable for various industries and use cases. With DHTMLX, you can seamlessly integrate sophisticated data grids, interactive charts, customizable UI controls, and dynamic calendars into your existing infrastructure. These components can be tailored to match your branding and design requirements, ensuring a seamless integration with your platform's aesthetics. Additionally, DHTMLX provides comprehensive documentation and responsive support, making it easy for developers to utilize the full potential of the components. In summary, DHTMLX offers the flexibility and functionality needed to enhance your software applications with powerful and visually appealing features.

Angular is our framework of choice for a number of reasons. Business data is almost always displayed in a grid format. It makes sense to start with a strong widget that is powerful and fast when building applications. Ignite UI provides a complete toolset of widgets for other frameworks, but Angular is our focus. Ignite UI is helping us deliver a great UX/UI.

Incentivized

• Gantt: Moving tasks or entire projects
• Gantt: A linked grid to display resource load
• Gantt: Full control allowing you to decide how to implement
• Pricing was reasonable and we can upgrade to Enterprise by paying the difference if required.

Incentivized

• The examples are great and close enough to real-life usage to be truly helpful
• The OOB configuration and themes are good. They are very configurable.
• The touch support and response web are built in, allowing the same code to work well on desktop and phone.

Incentivized

• We would like to have more cell controls (like a Date Time Picker, Date Range Picker)
• In the cell editing mode we would like to have a better integration into the Angular world

• I would like to see examples with security tokens. It really isn't an Ignite UI issue, but would be helpful.
• Some of the examples are over-simplified, not how the products would be used in real life.

Incentivized

With regard to the two major components we used, namely the tabular representation and the graphical modeler, we were able to effectively replace the existing building blocks of our applications by integrating them. We were able to retain existing functionalities and benefit from a significant enhancement with what DHTMLX offers natively. This made it easy for us to get our end-users to adopt the change.

DHTMLX library boasts lots of readily available components that can be easily integrated into web applications. Each feature is equipped with a multitude of events and methods that provide developers with complete control over data manipulation and management. DHTMLX is more easy for building enterprise-level applications that require complex UI elements and data visualization.

Incentivized

We tried DevExpress when we started a project a couple of years ago. At the time, the documentation and ease of use went to Infragistics. When trying new or updated tools, the documentation and samples are everything. Having minimal documentation or documentation that seems to be written for people that already know how to use the product is just plain frustrating. Samples need to be something close to the real-life usage of the product.

Incentivized

• Users appreciate the Spreadsheet like way of working with data
• Gantt charts are widely known and people like to work with them

• There is a learning curve, of course, but the comparisons between the projects with and without Ignite UI are worth it.
• The time savings on development is very real. The built-in functionality is amazing.
• We are able to focus on features rather than getting the look and feel of our deliverable.

Incentivized