Dice.com vs. Indeed Ads (Sponsored Jobs)

In our organization we prefer Dice.com for sourcing as well as for job posting purpose. which it perform well in sourcing of various profile with specific skill and location specification is much easy. review the resume is best to get or see the feedback. we use to job for non IT recruitment which perform well in all aspects.

Incentivized

In our market Dental Hygienists are extremely hard to find. We started using Indeed Sponsored Jobs for our hygienist positions and immediately received great response from quality candidates. Before we started using Indeed Sponsored Jobs for our hygiene positions we were in a drought. After using this program, we are hiring on average 2 hygienists per week.

Incentivized

• Filter
• Day to Day update resume
• Lots of profile can view in single page

Incentivized

• Immediate response, that's what I need. I post the job, there is no waiting one day or two hours to respond to the candidates.
• Gives me better visibility, better ability to choose different candidates, I've tried sponsored jobs with deal-breakers and non-deal-breakers. Sometimes is best not to have a deal-breaker for certain jobs because I might pass on a candidate I wouldn't have thought to maybe take a look at.
• I've also used the instant match, I'm starting to get better at qualifying those candidates and I had a few applicants from that.

Incentivized

• shortlisted of resume is getting mismatch sometime
• contact details miss match sometime
• no other major flow in the sourcing or posting

Incentivized

• It would be helpful if in the messages tab you could sort messages into folders and mark messages as unread once you have read them.
• Reposting an old closed job is difficult because it is no longer in the templates. If I go to my closed jobs it would be nice if it had an option to "reopen as a new job".

Incentivized

This is the #1 site where candidates go for a job in our industry. We continue to get the best results from this platform.

Incentivized

I can give 100%, because my first preference is Dice.com only. when i start the work i will post requirement in Dice.com meanwhile i am working. i am getting lots of resume in Dice.com posting, it will reduce my heavy work and we will find critical resume from Dice.com only

Incentivized

They continue to improve their platform. Although sometimes adding more functions can decrease usability, Indeed is very good at adding definitions and information in a very user-friendly way. You are truly able to customize your service and job ads in a way that benefits you and your company. You also have complete control over your ad and your budget

Incentivized

Our Indeed support team far exceeds the support I've received from any other recruitment platform. We have a dedicated account executive AND a client support specialist, both of whom go out of their way to assist with everything from making our job ads more effective to make the billing process more transparent. They are a rock star team that truly takes the stress out of recruiting!

Incentivized

Again, I came onboard after our company had conducted the implementation but from working closely with those that went through process I have heard it went very smoothly

Incentivized

Even though I have an access to all the portals to source the profiles, My priority will be Dice.com, as I can get the result much faster than other portals

Incentivized

I've used Monster as it was linked to a product called Job Target, and I felt it was ok. It seemed larger and I didn't have the capability to input specific parameters for our jobs. It was more generalized and just didn't work as well for us.

Incentivized

• It's value tools for Sourcing and screening
• I can get the profile in turn around time which saves my time spending more on portals
• Definitely it improved my performance

• We have only indeed connected to our ATS for less than six months, so tracking true ROI on time to hire is hard to dive into.
• The cost per hire has increased over the last couple of years due to how competitive it is for hourly employees across the industry.
• The quality of applicants is about the same. We find that Indeed can provide quantity for hourly positions not necessarily quality and we continue to struggle with candidates not showing up for interviews.

Incentivized