Digital.ai TeamForge vs. Screenful

As long as you are looking for a tool that segregates who can do what with a given repository and branch in GIT, and do not mind strictly using TeamForge's Agile tracking software that comes native to the application, this is the tool for you. The tool is fairly user-friendly, and they have an excellent support staff. You're really buying that support, more than anything else. If however, your company insists on using separated agile tracking software such as Version One, I would not recommend TeamForge. They prefer an all or nothing kind of deal.

Incentivized

Screenful works really well when integrated with Jira and GitHub, both of which do not have the robust data visualisation capability. In contrast, we tried using it for Monday.com but did not see much added value there

Incentivized

• Code security.
• Code migration.
• Agile tie-in.

Incentivized

• Burndown charts.
• Milestone completion.
• Team task allocation and man hours spent.

Incentivized

• I would like to see personalization for managing artifacts, that is, allowing the user to customize pages and save personalized settings and then save them as bookmarks.
• I would like an improved subversion browser such as a graphical user interface rather than a basic file explorer.
• I would like built in features for CollabNet TeamForge integrated with subversion so that i can associate my private code branches and code changes.

Incentivized

• I feel there is room for improvement when it comes to supporting guides, knowledge centers.
• Also, customer support options might a good resource to have.
• I have always liked tools that show what similar teams are doing to use the tool. Like a case study. I did not find that here.

Incentivized

They always answer the phone when we put a call in, any time. They have consistently sent out contractors when needed and were there every step of the way when we switched over from ClearCase to TeamForge years ago. The support is what you really pay for when you buy into TeamForge.

Incentivized

CollabNet TeamForge is superior to Mercury mainly because it has a subversion change management tool integrated with the product. CollabNet TeamForge offers more complexity but with more flexibility for managing and tracking projects. I think
CollabNet TeamForge is more comprehensive than either Mercury and JIRA. They're all user friendly tools with short learning curves but CollabNet TeamForge is most efficient in my experience.
JIRA was recently adopted for particular applications and is currently being evaluated by various technology teams.

Incentivized

I selected screenful because it was easier to use and more cost-effective. Asana seems like a better fit in terms of design and appeal but eventually, after I did a trial of both platforms, I found Screenful to be a better fit for our needs. I also did a trial of Agency analytics but did not like it.

Incentivized

• CollabNet TeamForge has had a positive impact on the efficiency and productivity of managing and completing projects from specifications to software enhancements and from production issues/defects to bug fixes.
• As a developer, CollabNet TeamForge allows me to focus more on delivering projects accurately and timely while maintaining communications with the business.
• CollabNet TeamForge Is an efficiency life-cycle management product that helps my team meet business objectives by quickly delivering quality software, documenting projects in a smart and organized way and updating project status to senior management.
• CollabNet TeamForge Subversion meets developers needs for change management and improves overall software development process in all phases of software lifecycle.

Incentivized

• In terms of ROI and value there has been a positive impact for sure.
• In terms of product updates and new integrations, I feel there is room for improvement.
• It gets the basic features and APIs right which I love.

Incentivized