DigitalOcean App Platform vs. Google Cloud Run

It can help you to host your virtual appliance or serverless application at very low cost. DigitalOcean marketplace also helps you to deploy the serverless app or virtual appliance effortlessly. It is suitable for small-scale deployment and the process to set up an account and rolling out your app via the marketplace is easy and cheap.

Incentivized

Microservices and RestFul API application as it is fast and reliant. Seamless integration with event triggers such as pubsub or event arc, so you can easily integrate that with usecases with file uploads, database changes, etc. Basically great with short-lived tasks, if however, you have long-running processses, Cloud Run might not be idle for this. For example if you have a long running data processing task, other solutions such as kubeflow pipelines or dataflow are more suited for this kind of tasks. Cloud Run is also stateless, so if you need memory, you will have to connect an external database.

Incentivized

• Hosting of serverless application
• Hosting of load balancer
• Hosting of virtual appliances

Incentivized

• Real-time autoscaling. Escalamento automático em tempo real
• Simplified Continuous Deployment. Implantação contínua simplificada
• Running tasks in the background. Execução de tarefas em segundo plano

Incentivized

• The company has not been very communicative as of lately. Not much news, no apparent work on missing features.
• Some components are incomplete as far as some critical features. For example, I use RethinkDB as my database and it's missing critical features like backup and clustering, so It is unusable and they should have made that clear from the get go.
• The pricing on the support plan is vague. I do have the feeling it is actually well worth the money, but it's hard to form a decisions based without more predictable specific.
• Seems to me like the platform's future is unclear.

Incentivized

• Cloud Run doesn't allow you to redeploy an already existing revision which can be inconvenient in some use cases
• Tricky to get the deployment working to start but once it's working that's great
• The actual deployment is not the fastest but it's not too bad

Incentivized

We definitely need to renew it because we dont own our own infrastructure and storage and we are happy with Cloud Run features

Incentivized

The UI/console is great... the documentation is top-notch for developers, but the CLI itself when you have to script around it is very complex and easy to forget some options... the downside of a generic command line client.

Incentivized

Not seen any major issues when we run applications its good

Incentivized

Initially we felt slow but slowly it picked up and easy to manage

Incentivized

I was involved in the initial implementation setup, Its easy with the given documentaiton we can do ourself. Not that critical

Incentivized

The ability to choose your own cloud provider is huge, especially for a small start up like I have. We have a lot of free credit from AWS, Google Cloud, IBM, Azure, etc... The data layer is baked into the system which is better for integration then an external provider. There are also a lot fewer differences between environment as everything is Docker based which gives me the confidence that what works on my machine is going to work in production. Heroku doesn't have good support for Docker containers yet and although Heroku has served me well in the past, it is limited in some aspects.

Incentivized

AWS Lambda supports code zip package, enabling lower cold start time. Also, AWS Lambda pricing is much simpler, easier to understand.

Other than that, the 2 products are very similar, including the Docker image support: the image must be built based on proprietary base image.

Obviously, if your other services are running in GCP, then Google Cloud Run is your only choice for tight integration, & private networking.

Incentivized

It has good auto scale feature and reliable also

Incentivized

• The platform is saving me a lot of time I would have been wasting on operations instead of development.
• The platform is saving me a lot of money as I can easily switch between cloud providers to find the best price.
• I am worried though for the price I might have to pay in case of an unexpected system issue.
• Hopefully I will be able to pay the support plan before that.

Incentivized

• It has saved us some costs since we now do not require a live server and have moved to a serverless workflow for these services
• Breaking changes do not affect the entire application now that we have separated our concerns using a serverless service
• Much easier to debug since we can now isolate our services and reduce the search space for finding/fixing bugs

Incentivized