Docmosis vs. Foxit PDF Editor

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Docmosis
Score 10.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Docmosis is a self-hosted or SaaS template-based document generation solution that integrates with custom-built software applications or popular third-party apps using the API. Templates can be created using using MS Word or LibreOffice, and plain-text placeholders control: the insertion of text/images/tables; conditionally add/remove any content; perform calculations; loop over repeating data; and format data/numbers. Used by customers in Finance, Health,…
$50
Monthly
Foxit PDF Editor
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Foxit PDF Editor is a solution for creating, editing, organizing, and securing PDF documents. Designed for professionals and businesses of all sizes, features include editing capabilities, OCR, collaboration tools, and security options like redaction and document encryption.
$10.99
per month per user
Pricing
DocmosisFoxit PDF Editor
Editions & Modules
Cloud
$50.00
Monthly
Tornado
$2895.00
Docmosis-Java
$2895.00
Foxit PDF Editor
$10.99
per month per user
Foxit PDF Editor +
$13.99
per month per user
Foxit PDF Editor
$129.99
per year per user
Foxit PDF Editor+
$159.99
per year per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DocmosisFoxit PDF Editor
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DocmosisFoxit PDF Editor
Features
DocmosisFoxit PDF Editor
PDF Editors
Comparison of PDF Editors features of Product A and Product B
Docmosis
-
Ratings
Foxit PDF Editor
8.8
Ratings
5% above category average
Edit Text and Images00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Merge or Split PDFs00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Add Annotations00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Text Recognition (OCR)00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Page Management00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Form Creation and Editing00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Secure PDFs00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Convert to Different Formats00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Comment and Review Tools00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Undo and Redo Actions00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
DocmosisFoxit PDF Editor
Small Businesses
airSlate WorkFlow
airSlate WorkFlow
Score 7.5 out of 10
Tungsten Power PDF
Tungsten Power PDF
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Foxit PDF Editor
Foxit PDF Editor
Score 8.7 out of 10
pdfFiller
pdfFiller
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Conga Composer
Conga Composer
Score 9.6 out of 10
Bluebeam
Bluebeam
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DocmosisFoxit PDF Editor
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DocmosisFoxit PDF Editor
Likelihood to Recommend
With customer support and flexibility in handling specific, unique scenarios, they are able to provide solutions quickly. There are no scenarios currently which we are aware that it may be less appropriate. If you have very large documents you should review architecture choices on how best to optimize your performance using Docmosis.
Read full review
Great for marking up depositions or pleadings with highlights, comments, and notes during case review.
Supports Bates stamping, password protection, and other features often required for electronic filing.

Built-in tools allow for quick and secure redaction of privileged or confidential information before sharing or filing. Less appropriate if you needed to work on real time collaboration or building complex form templates from scratch.
Read full review
Pros
  • Docmosis is excellent at support and will work with you to find a solution for your particular use cases.
  • During our evaluation process, they were very helpful to get us up and running and we were one of the first docker based implementations so they worked quickly to get our infrastructure support setup.
  • Their solution is very flexible and allows several ways to allow support dynamic document generation at a very good value.
Read full review
  • FoxitPhantom carries superior editing tools over Adobe Acrobat and similar products. It allows you to modify text, images, & objects in a more robust fashion
  • Integrates well with Microsoft Office products such as Word, PPT, & Excel
  • Allows you to work in a nearly paperless environment
Read full review
Cons
  • There isn't much in terms of what could be improved, but the only challenge we have which is in terms of future scaling and isn't a limitation, but just something we're trying to be cognizant of as it might increase our infrastructure costs. Since we have large numbers of multi-nested document templates, and large documents. Although Docmosis did help us reduce the time to generate our largest documents by a large percentage. This is likely an area of improvement that all providers would need to address.
Read full review
  • I have a dual monitor setup at work and there are times when I wish that I could view pdf documents on both monitors at the same time. I have not yet figured out how to do that with FoxitPhantom as it appears to limit the user to displaying multiple pdf documents as separate tabs on the same screen. If dual screen is an option in the software, it needs to be more apparent.
  • I can't think of any other desired improvements. This software really does everything that I need it to do.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Because very few editors are so easy to use and deploy backed by speed and performance. Foxit PDF is known for its speed and performance, allowing users to open and work with PDF files quickly and efficiently
Foxit's user-friendly interface is easy to navigate and use, making it a popular choice for users who are new to PDF software.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Functionality and features it has as well as being quiet user friendly. It would be nice though if it wasn't laggy as often and had better page organizational tools. It often bogs down when this is being done or doesn't work properly when moving pages around and needed
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
FoxitPhantom PDF integrates very well with the Microsoft Office products, which is where I found I use this the most. It performs about as well as can be expected, without any out of place latency. Whether it be merging, deleting, editing or rearranging pages, its performance holds up even with larger documents.
Read full review
Support Rating
They always respond to support and provide resolutions quickly and even provide the ability for new features/support to be incorporated very cooperatively by help with with alternate solutions as necessary.
Read full review
I haven't personally had interaction with the customer support from FoxitPhantom, however based on conversations I have had with members in the organization, I was given positive feedback. Their website has a lot of information and tutorials. If you need to contact them, they are quick to respond. User manuals are readily available.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We also evaluated Winward Studios solution along with HotDocs, we selected Docmosis for the following reasons:
1. We were using docker very early on, so they were very cooperative in helping us get our infrastructure working during the early evaluation phases, and went above and beyond to help with some of our template processing efforts.
2. When we were looking to improve the processing speed due to our complex large number of dynamically inserted templates, Docmosis was helpful with ideas. We were able to improve speed quite significantly with Docmosis' help by managing some dynamic aspects of our templates and including them inline vs. having them loaded dynamically.
Read full review
1. In Kofax the functionality of the component is limited in that it cannot process
PDF files larger than 2 GB due to the technological constraints of
LeadTools. To process large PDF documents, it is advisable to use
compression as a workaround. 2. In Kofax the black and white images must be created with at least 200 dpi resolution for reading new item number barcodes as we deploy in our news room.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Very strong impact on ROI as it's value has been able to scale with our user growth.
Read full review
  • For a PDF software in a our company is difficult to translate the software performance into financial results. With a PDF software is a lot less obvious than an ERP of a Payroll System, but one advantage could be the savings that a lower cost of licensing would bring when it is used by a bigger number of users.
  • A positive impact is the ease of use when creating and filing new hired employees, but once again, it is hard to say that it is faster than a different PDF software and even if that was the case the savings in time would be probably unnoticeable. At least one would be having a process with no hassles when creating and saving your PDF documents for your employees.
  • So far no crashes. I have never heard a complain about Foxit crashing even when you have dozens of documents opened at the same time. We can't say the same when using other applications like Excel... This brings peace of mind and less frustrated users.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Docmosis Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of