DocuSign CLM vs. Icertis

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
DocuSign CLM
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
DocuSign CLM, formerly SpringCM, is a cloud-based platform that can be used to manage documents, contracts and related collateral. The solution includes workflows that can be tailored to an organization's business processes. It is also designed to accelerate team collaboration. SpringCM was acquired by DocuSign in the summer of 2018.
$15
per month
Icertis
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Icertis supports contract lifecycle management (CLM). The analyst-validated Icertis Contract Intelligence (ICI) platform aims to turn contracts from static documents into strategic advantage by structuring and connecting the critical contract information that defines how an organization runs. Icertis boasts users among iconic brands and disruptive innovators who use Icertis to fully realize the intent of their combined 7.5 million+ contracts worth more than $1 trillion, in 40+ languages and 90+…N/A
Pricing
DocuSign CLMIcertis
Editions & Modules
Personal
$15
per month
Real Estate Starter
$15
per month
DocuSign for Realtors
$35
per user/per month
Standard
$40
per user/per month
Business Pro
$60
per user/per month
Starter
$75
per month
Intermediate
$450
per month
Advanced Solutions
Contact sales team
Real Estate Plus, Broker Edition
Contact sales team
Sandbox Account
Free
Enterprise Offerings
Contact sales team
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DocuSign CLMIcertis
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DocuSign CLMIcertis
Considered Both Products
DocuSign CLM
Chose DocuSign CLM
DocuSign CLM has a much improved user experience compared to similar products we have used. The streamlining of templates and traceability through the signing process are huge benefits, and better than competitors. The ability to set up designated templates for different …
Chose DocuSign CLM
DocuSign CLM is the only product that we've used for signing contracts digitally.
Chose DocuSign CLM
Adobe Acrobat sign was a more confusing process compared to DocuSign CLM. Acrobat presented signature abilities, yet sometimes this was electronic and sometimes this was done manually. Additionally, it is difficult to send and track the document when it goes to more than one …
Chose DocuSign CLM
This was the first software of this kind I had found and couldn't be happier. It had resolved the majority of our problems and we do not see the need of looking for another option at all.
Chose DocuSign CLM
The reason I have chosen DocuSign is because it is the most common app that will pop up (especially when opening something in Gmail or Google Drive) to let you sign a document. I do not necessarily want to use DocuSign, and I don't always use it, but sometimes it is just easier …
Chose DocuSign CLM
Hands down the best platform out there - easy to use, safe and secure, and compatible across multiple devices from the computer, tablet, and phone.
Chose DocuSign CLM
Because of all the options, we found in the market, this one was the most suitable for our needs. The price and the functionality were correct. We wanted a user-friendly tool to replace quickly and in an easy way, the handwriting sign-off and this was the best option we had.
Chose DocuSign CLM
N/A. Havent used a similar product.
Chose DocuSign CLM
I've used DocuSign CLM because that is what my employer usually sends me. I think DocuSign CLM is straight to the point and easy to upload and send back to my employer. Adobe Acrobat has more features when it comes to other actions.
Chose DocuSign CLM
Pandadoc seems to be a better option for small businesses.
Chose DocuSign CLM
- Docusign has better integration and flexibility.
- Docusign costs $10 a month for an individual compared to $14.99 for Adobe.
- 30 days free trial in DocuSign vs 14 days in adobe sign.
Chose DocuSign CLM
DocuSign was the more secure and accepted signature platform. A lot of our vendors would actually require we use it and initially would send the document over already signed by them with DocuSign.
Chose DocuSign CLM
I haven't evaluated other products similar to DocuSign. I have used Adobe Sign once but I am not in a position to review it against DocuSign since I only used Adobe Sign once.
Chose DocuSign CLM
I used it for documentation while joining my organization. It was used during the HR process. I had to upload all the documents on the portal and sign it and it was just a few clicks away and the entire process was done in a few clicks. This helped the HR and the BCG team to …
Chose DocuSign CLM
I have used Adobe's version and it does not do a better job. DocuSign is much easier to navigate/use. DocuSign has more options to edit and highlight parts that need to be signed. It has better signature options and you can resize them to make it look clean. Adobe doesn't …
Chose DocuSign CLM
I wanted a contract system to review and assess for the volume of contracts I was sending out. This was one of the first programs to review.
Chose DocuSign CLM
We did not consider an alternative to DocuSign. The reputation and ease of use was enough to make the purchasing decision and begin using it internally and with customers.
Chose DocuSign CLM
I like DocuSign a lot better than Adobe Acrobat Sign....just easier to maneuver and save signatures and copies of the paperwork (contract) to forward to the next person.
Chose DocuSign CLM
DocuSign CLM, formerly SpringCM, was a superior solution when I purchased it two years ago. It is still driving improvements for the company (as of last night's check-in with my old team).
Chose DocuSign CLM
I was not apart of the decision-making process for SpringCM. My assumption is that it does not stack well up against Apptus.
Icertis
Chose Icertis
Ariba contracts is still slightly easier to use, better interface and easier to manage as an administrator than Icertis. Ariba allows administrators the capabilities to make changes and updates with less reliance on support, allowing for independence.
Chose Icertis
Ariba Contracts was our previous contract tool. It basically acted as an overpriced contract repository.
Chose Icertis
Based on the demo, it seems like a great product
Chose Icertis
In our organization, we chose Icertis over Ariba Contracts because of its comprehensive feature set and its advanced contract analytics capabilities. We found that Icertis provided us with more flexibility and customization options, which was important for our organization's …
Chose Icertis
It was adopted before I came onboard.
Chose Icertis
I was not part of the RFP process.
Chose Icertis
I like Icertis much better. Ivalua was not user-friendly and our internal and external users had much difficulty with it.
Chose Icertis
The UI/UX could use some updating compared to the other systems mentioned. I was not a part of the selection process so I cannot speak about that process.
Chose Icertis
I think that all three of these platforms are solid products. I was not the decision maker in choosing Icertis over the other two products - that was handled by our IT department.
Features
DocuSign CLMIcertis
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Product A and Product B
DocuSign CLM
7.5
Ratings
6% below category average
Icertis
7.5
Ratings
6% below category average
Contract creation8.00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Contract templates8.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields8.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Guided logic6.00 Ratings5.40 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
DocuSign CLM
7.6
Ratings
9% below category average
Icertis
5.5
Ratings
40% below category average
Contract sharing8.00 Ratings4.10 Ratings
Contract editing8.00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts7.00 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Approval process8.00 Ratings3.90 Ratings
Interdepartmental workflows7.00 Ratings5.70 Ratings
MS Word plug-in00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
DocuSign CLM
8.3
Ratings
0% above category average
Icertis
6.2
Ratings
29% below category average
Contract database8.00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
Contract search7.00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts8.00 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Custom contract reports8.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Tracking contract status9.00 Ratings6.20 Ratings
Compliance check10.00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Contract Management
Comparison of Contract Management features of Product A and Product B
DocuSign CLM
8.2
Ratings
6% above category average
Icertis
-
Ratings
Contract Storage8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced Search and Filtering8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Contract Templates8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Acceleration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
E-Signatures9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Reminders and Alerts8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with other Systems8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
DocuSign CLMIcertis
Small Businesses
airSlate WorkFlow
airSlate WorkFlow
Score 7.5 out of 10
airSlate WorkFlow
airSlate WorkFlow
Score 7.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
PandaDoc
PandaDoc
Score 9.0 out of 10
PandaDoc
PandaDoc
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Conga CLM
Conga CLM
Score 8.8 out of 10
Conga CLM
Conga CLM
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DocuSign CLMIcertis
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(0 ratings)
6.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
4.1
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
2.7
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DocuSign CLMIcertis
Likelihood to Recommend
DocuSign is useful for collecting electronic signatures on isolated documents and packets that are administered separately or integrated into another system. DocuSign is integrated into our onboarding system, Paylocity, which is where the employee completes all onboarding tasks required for employment. Integrating DocuSign with Paylocity allows us to send documents that require more than one signature along with other onboarding tasks, which makes for a less confusing onboarding experience for the worker. DocuSign also allows us to automatically run E-Verify from the integrated Form I-9 Document, which saves us lots of time onboarding each employee.
Read full review
Icertis is a great partner in managing contractual obligations and commitments ! The benefit really comes from the real-time integrations the ICI platform is able to partner with . We are able to save the company time, money, and resources by just knowing what credits are owed in real-time! Before we had the Obligation Management app, the process for tracking SLAs was really clunky and details were often missed. Now, it's a breeze!
Read full review
Pros
  • Alerts when documents are signed
  • Notifications if customers don't complete any or all of their required tasks
  • Showing clients exactly where to sign
  • Making signing easy and fast
Read full review
  • Contract Creation and Management: Icertis excels at streamlining the contract creation process. It allows users to easily create and manage contracts using pre-approved templates, which can be customized as needed. The platform also includes built-in e-signature capabilities, making it easy for all parties to sign and execute contracts electronically. This has greatly reduced the time and resources needed for contract management, and has enabled our organization to be more efficient in the contract creation process.
  • Contract Compliance: Icertis helps organizations stay compliant with regulatory requirements by providing real-time tracking and alerts for contract expiration dates, renewal dates, and other important dates. This feature has been particularly useful for our organization, allowing us to avoid costly contract renewals and stay compliant with legal requirements.
  • Analytics and Reporting: Icertis provides powerful analytics and reporting capabilities that allow organizations to gain valuable insights into their contract portfolio. These analytics and reports can be used to identify trends, track performance, and make more informed business decisions. This has been particularly beneficial for our organization, allowing us to better understand the performance of our contracts and make more strategic decisions.
Read full review
Cons
  • Increase sending limit for initial plans
  • Faster return for client service requests
  • When correcting a document, no new email is sent for notification of an update. The clients have to go back to the old document, and it feels uncomfortable for them.
Read full review
  • Some features are unnecessarily limiting. For example, the inability to delete records or change fields later if it turns out there has been a mistake in how the contract was entered or the term was described. The Icertis form fields are NOT the contract record that is required to be kept. If someone makes an error, they should be able to fix it. The contract itself doesn't change, and that is the business record.
  • Too much is built on the assumption that the person requesting the contract is the one with the control or ownership of the contract. It would be better if the person to whom the contract is submitted for review was the owner in the system.
  • Not all requests will in fact end with a contract. Sometimes requests are started and the project is abandoned or put on hold for a period of time. More status fields that reflect the reality of contracting would be helpful.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Some functionality could be achieved with less clicking, the change management could be done a bit a better for deployments
Read full review
Support Rating
I am constantly experiencing issues with SpringCM.
Read full review
super dependent on how much money you want to pay. The general regular support can usually take around one to two weeks to get an answer and sometimes that issue is fixed but the underlying issue is not addressed even if you call out that it is a repeated issue. It appears that sometimes support is not really trained in how your instance is set up so there can be a bit of back and forth just to be able to get the appropriate support.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
DocuSign CLM has a much improved user experience compared to similar products we have used. The streamlining of templates and traceability through the signing process are huge benefits, and better than competitors. The ability to set up designated templates for different use-case scenarios, and roll out efficient documents for signing, is invaluable, as well as other functions like Bulk Send and PowerForms.
Read full review
In our organization, we chose Icertis over Ariba Contracts because of its comprehensive feature set and its advanced contract analytics capabilities. We found that Icertis provided us with more flexibility and customization options, which was important for our organization's specific needs. Additionally, the AI-driven contract insights provided by Icertis have been extremely helpful in helping us optimize business decisions and realize the full potential of our contracts.Another important factor is that Icertis is industry agnostic, while Ariba Contracts has a stronger presence in specific industries. Icertis is more suitable for a wider range of organizations and that's why in our fictional organization we selected it.Overall, both Icertis and Ariba Contracts are powerful contract management software solutions, but Icertis's advanced contract analytics and its flexibility and industry agnostic approach make it a better fit for our fictional organization.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Made our sales process faster and client teams could start implementation faster than increased revenues
  • Our lives are easier as a team when we use e-signatures, saving time, paper, and protecting the environment
  • DocuSign is a well-known brand so that increase our company's value in the eye of clients and makes us look PRO
Read full review
  • Since implementing the platform, we have seen a significant reduction in the time and resources spent on contract management. This has allowed us to reallocate these resources to other areas of the business, resulting in increased revenue.
  • Additionally, Icertis has helped us to improve our entitlement and obligations management, allowing us to better track and manage our contract expiration dates, renewals, and other important dates. This has helped us to avoid costly contract renewals and stay compliant with regulatory requirements, thereby protecting us against noncompliance and penalties.
  • The platform's built-in analytics and reporting capabilities have also been valuable in helping us to gain valuable insights into our contract portfolio, allowing us to make more informed business decisions. Additionally, the platform's contract intelligence has helped us to shorten our sales cycles, which has enabled us to close more deals in less time.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Icertis Screenshots

Screenshot of Intelligent Contract Set-up: Intelligent Contract Setup: Personalized, role-based experience for any type of user with flexibility models for complex organizationsScreenshot of Contract Operations: Self-service contracting with intelligent contract negotiations and bulk processing for quick responsesScreenshot of Governance Risk & Compliance: Enables users to proactively identify, assess and manage all contract risks and ensure the fulfillment of contractual obligations based on proactive insights from ICI’s compliance tools.Screenshot of Reporting & Dashboards: Improves visibility to reduces contract cycle times improve negotiation outcomes with dashboards and reportsScreenshot of Analyze Obligations: Obligations and fulfilments can be viewed from customized reports- across users, contract types, and statusScreenshot of Obligation Dashboard: Provides a 360-degree view of compliances with micro-actionable insights to the level of individual agreements