DocuSign CLM vs. INHUBBER

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
DocuSign CLM
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
DocuSign CLM, formerly SpringCM, is a cloud-based platform that can be used to manage documents, contracts and related collateral. The solution includes workflows that can be tailored to an organization's business processes. It is also designed to accelerate team collaboration. SpringCM was acquired by DocuSign in the summer of 2018.
$15
per month
INHUBBER
Score 9.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Contract lifecycle management platform with cloud security, digital signature and AI-powered document management. AI helps customers simplify contract management by making it understandable, interactive and automated. Digital signature signs any file format along with text and images.N/A
Pricing
DocuSign CLMINHUBBER
Editions & Modules
Personal
$15
per month
Real Estate Starter
$15
per month
DocuSign for Realtors
$35
per user/per month
Standard
$40
per user/per month
Business Pro
$60
per user/per month
Starter
$75
per month
Intermediate
$450
per month
Advanced Solutions
Contact sales team
Real Estate Plus, Broker Edition
Contact sales team
Sandbox Account
Free
Enterprise Offerings
Contact sales team
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DocuSign CLMINHUBBER
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DocuSign CLMINHUBBER
Considered Both Products
DocuSign CLM
Chose DocuSign CLM
DocuSign CLM has a much improved user experience compared to similar products we have used. The streamlining of templates and traceability through the signing process are huge benefits, and better than competitors. The ability to set up designated templates for different …
Chose DocuSign CLM
DocuSign CLM is the only product that we've used for signing contracts digitally.
Chose DocuSign CLM
Adobe Acrobat sign was a more confusing process compared to DocuSign CLM. Acrobat presented signature abilities, yet sometimes this was electronic and sometimes this was done manually. Additionally, it is difficult to send and track the document when it goes to more than one …
Chose DocuSign CLM
This was the first software of this kind I had found and couldn't be happier. It had resolved the majority of our problems and we do not see the need of looking for another option at all.
Chose DocuSign CLM
The reason I have chosen DocuSign is because it is the most common app that will pop up (especially when opening something in Gmail or Google Drive) to let you sign a document. I do not necessarily want to use DocuSign, and I don't always use it, but sometimes it is just easier …
Chose DocuSign CLM
Hands down the best platform out there - easy to use, safe and secure, and compatible across multiple devices from the computer, tablet, and phone.
Chose DocuSign CLM
Because of all the options, we found in the market, this one was the most suitable for our needs. The price and the functionality were correct. We wanted a user-friendly tool to replace quickly and in an easy way, the handwriting sign-off and this was the best option we had.
Chose DocuSign CLM
N/A. Havent used a similar product.
Chose DocuSign CLM
I've used DocuSign CLM because that is what my employer usually sends me. I think DocuSign CLM is straight to the point and easy to upload and send back to my employer. Adobe Acrobat has more features when it comes to other actions.
Chose DocuSign CLM
Pandadoc seems to be a better option for small businesses.
Chose DocuSign CLM
- Docusign has better integration and flexibility.
- Docusign costs $10 a month for an individual compared to $14.99 for Adobe.
- 30 days free trial in DocuSign vs 14 days in adobe sign.
Chose DocuSign CLM
DocuSign was the more secure and accepted signature platform. A lot of our vendors would actually require we use it and initially would send the document over already signed by them with DocuSign.
Chose DocuSign CLM
I haven't evaluated other products similar to DocuSign. I have used Adobe Sign once but I am not in a position to review it against DocuSign since I only used Adobe Sign once.
Chose DocuSign CLM
I used it for documentation while joining my organization. It was used during the HR process. I had to upload all the documents on the portal and sign it and it was just a few clicks away and the entire process was done in a few clicks. This helped the HR and the BCG team to …
Chose DocuSign CLM
I have used Adobe's version and it does not do a better job. DocuSign is much easier to navigate/use. DocuSign has more options to edit and highlight parts that need to be signed. It has better signature options and you can resize them to make it look clean. Adobe doesn't …
Chose DocuSign CLM
I wanted a contract system to review and assess for the volume of contracts I was sending out. This was one of the first programs to review.
Chose DocuSign CLM
We did not consider an alternative to DocuSign. The reputation and ease of use was enough to make the purchasing decision and begin using it internally and with customers.
Chose DocuSign CLM
I like DocuSign a lot better than Adobe Acrobat Sign....just easier to maneuver and save signatures and copies of the paperwork (contract) to forward to the next person.
Chose DocuSign CLM
DocuSign CLM, formerly SpringCM, was a superior solution when I purchased it two years ago. It is still driving improvements for the company (as of last night's check-in with my old team).
Chose DocuSign CLM
I was not apart of the decision-making process for SpringCM. My assumption is that it does not stack well up against Apptus.
INHUBBER
Chose INHUBBER
Conga CLM (Conga Contracts), Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management, SAP Ariba Contract Management, Juro and PandaDoc
Chose INHUBBER
PandaDoc, Juro, ContractWorks, Adobe Sign, DocuSign CLM, formerly SpringCM and Apptus eSales
Chose INHUBBER
Conga CPQ (formerly Apttus CPQ), ContractWorks, Juro, DocuSign, Adobe Sign, DocuSign CLM and formerly SpringCM
Chose INHUBBER
PandaDoc, Juro, ContractWorks, Kdan Mobile DottedSign, DocuSign CLM, formerly SpringCM and Adobe Sign
Features
DocuSign CLMINHUBBER
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Product A and Product B
DocuSign CLM
7.5
Ratings
6% below category average
INHUBBER
8.7
Ratings
9% above category average
Contract creation8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract templates8.00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Guided logic6.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
DocuSign CLM
7.6
Ratings
9% below category average
INHUBBER
9.2
Ratings
10% above category average
Contract sharing8.00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Contract editing8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Approval process8.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Interdepartmental workflows7.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
DocuSign CLM
8.3
Ratings
0% above category average
INHUBBER
9.3
Ratings
12% above category average
Contract database8.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Contract search7.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts8.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Custom contract reports8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Tracking contract status9.00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Compliance check10.00 Ratings9.20 Ratings
Contract Management
Comparison of Contract Management features of Product A and Product B
DocuSign CLM
8.2
Ratings
6% above category average
INHUBBER
-
Ratings
Contract Storage8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced Search and Filtering8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable Contract Templates8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Acceleration9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
E-Signatures9.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Reminders and Alerts8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with other Systems8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
DocuSign CLMINHUBBER
Small Businesses
airSlate WorkFlow
airSlate WorkFlow
Score 7.5 out of 10
airSlate WorkFlow
airSlate WorkFlow
Score 7.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
PandaDoc
PandaDoc
Score 9.0 out of 10
PandaDoc
PandaDoc
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Conga CLM
Conga CLM
Score 8.8 out of 10
Conga CLM
Conga CLM
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DocuSign CLMINHUBBER
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DocuSign CLMINHUBBER
Likelihood to Recommend
DocuSign is useful for collecting electronic signatures on isolated documents and packets that are administered separately or integrated into another system. DocuSign is integrated into our onboarding system, Paylocity, which is where the employee completes all onboarding tasks required for employment. Integrating DocuSign with Paylocity allows us to send documents that require more than one signature along with other onboarding tasks, which makes for a less confusing onboarding experience for the worker. DocuSign also allows us to automatically run E-Verify from the integrated Form I-9 Document, which saves us lots of time onboarding each employee.
Read full review
Organize large volumes of contracts with attachments. Reduce the number of copies and versions of documents. To keep documents in a location that is searchable and provides an overview of what the contracts are intended to accomplish. To stay up to date on the terms and conditions of documents and take advantage of opportunities such as volume discounts accordingly.
Read full review
Pros
  • Alerts when documents are signed
  • Notifications if customers don't complete any or all of their required tasks
  • Showing clients exactly where to sign
  • Making signing easy and fast
Read full review
  • It tracks contract expiration dates, renewal periods, etc.
  • Automates and manages approvals and helps maintain order in contract management.
  • Keeps contracts in a secure location and supports version control.
  • Saves time by extracting useful data, e.g. deadlines.
  • Provides a very handy reminder management system.
Read full review
Cons
  • Increase sending limit for initial plans
  • Faster return for client service requests
  • When correcting a document, no new email is sent for notification of an update. The clients have to go back to the old document, and it feels uncomfortable for them.
Read full review
  • If you just want to quickly look something up the tool can feel a bit overloaded like it's trying to do everything at once.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
The platform helps you to get your things done. It is designed the way so that user spends as little time as possible on dealing with low-value activities like labeling, structuring, signing and focuses more on the things that will determine how much you will get out of the contract, like setting reminders for the deliverables, extracting the key information, etc.
Read full review
Support Rating
I am constantly experiencing issues with SpringCM.
Read full review
It's easy to understand and to use, though I still recommend asking a colleague or contacting support to get a quick tutorial for first-time users.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
DocuSign CLM has a much improved user experience compared to similar products we have used. The streamlining of templates and traceability through the signing process are huge benefits, and better than competitors. The ability to set up designated templates for different use-case scenarios, and roll out efficient documents for signing, is invaluable, as well as other functions like Bulk Send and PowerForms.
Read full review
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Made our sales process faster and client teams could start implementation faster than increased revenues
  • Our lives are easier as a team when we use e-signatures, saving time, paper, and protecting the environment
  • DocuSign is a well-known brand so that increase our company's value in the eye of clients and makes us look PRO
Read full review
  • It saves time by replacing channels for document encryption. No need for emails; makes work safer and easier to figure out what document the team is working on.
  • No need to switch between the platforms to sign documents.
  • No need to read the whole document; just the places AI highlighted.
Read full review
ScreenShots

INHUBBER Screenshots

Screenshot of Manage contracts quickly and efficiently.  Create, sign and store contracts securely. Automated document analysis and deadline control. Free digital signature. Start immediately. No installation or onboarding costs.  All contract management tools.Screenshot of All contract management tools in one place. Contract repository: Fast signing: Security agreements: Document analysis: Workflows: Workspaces:Screenshot of Suitable tools for every sector. Streamline your contract management and give your customer the best digital signature experience. Start immediately without time-consuming training. - Real Estate - Procurement - Sales - PersonnelScreenshot of ◦ Reduce costs:     ➪ Up to 50%: Reduction in annual contract management costs.     ➪ Up to 10%: Save your total annual income with effective contract management  ◦ Save time: Up to 20%:     ➪ Faster contract approval times with our digital signatureScreenshot of ◦ Security and Transparency:     ➪ All data and communication are End-to-End encrypted. Secure access with two factor authentification. Hosted on German servers.  ◦ Artificial Intelligence:     ➪ Automated data and deadline extraction within seconds.Screenshot of Every transaction with a contract is recorded using Blockchain technology for tamper-proof, transparent tracking. The contracts are stored in a structured manner and can be downloaded in the same structure at any time if required.