Dreamdata vs. Metadata.io

I am quite likely to recommend Dreamdata to a colleague or connection in a number of scenarios, in particular I have found it to be appropriate for the tracking of Marketing multi touch attribution across all our activities and where we have impacted lead, handraiser and client journeys with our various different marketing materials.

Incentivized

Metadata is well suited when you have a really large ad budget (>50k per month at least). This is because the power of metadata lies in the ability to quickly set up and run a large number of experiments (combinations of channel, audience, creative, and conversion assets). To evaluate these variations, all of them need a large number of impressions, clicks, and conversions to be statistically relevant. If your budget is smaller, you will either have a very small number of experiments (not fully utilizing the power of metadata), or your experiments will not have enough clicks to make informed decisions. We had expected a better explanation of this from metadata before signing up.

Incentivized

• Multi touch attribution
• Visualisation of brands
• Visualisation of data

Incentivized

• Best paid ops tool I've ever used (and I've used a lot): we can launch a new LinkedIn & Facebook campaign in minutes.
• Lead gen ops: no more dealing with broken zapier zaps, we are able to automate pushing native lead gen leads directly to our CRM.
• Attribution: see influenced & triggered opportunities/CW deals
• Multivariate testing: Metadata scales audience, ad, creative testing so you learn what performs much faster than manual process

Incentivized

• Condensed overview
• Quicker loading data

Incentivized

• It was difficult to set goals on the individual campaign level vs. all ad campaigns
• It seems like the automation in-platform is better than what Metadata provides so you can have better results running ads natively.
• They have some work to do to improve the user experience for running experiments because it is one of their best features but it's hard to use.

Incentivized

Dream data has a really user friendly user experience and user interface - I like the colours, the logos make things a lot easier to read and navigate between, and it is a generally intuitive experience. It is easy to find your way to the data that you need to see

Incentivized

Metadata's customer support is a difference-maker! They really do care how well your campaigns perform and will help you improve them.

Incentivized

These aren't apples-to-apples comparisons: I used Triblio at a previous company. Triblio is primarily for ABM display and you can have smaller audience pools (to the company level). Metadata has a display ad component that I am not currently licensed for. Triblio has added ABM features like personalized landing pages and resource hubs specific to target companies which have the potential to be really effective. I evaluated Influ2. They seem to be really great at targeting a person level across channels. So you can run a campaign to an audience as small as 1-5 people at a specific company using various targeting methods including email upload. Metadata can't get this granular.

Incentivized

• Ability to prove marketing spend worth
• Ability to track multi touch attribution
• Deeper understanding of client journeys in order to optimize funnel

Incentivized

• Huge decrease in CPLs, CPMQL and Cost Per Opportunity
• Big improvement in MQL to SQL rates
• 90%+ of our leads from paid social now have valid business emails, before it was like 30%
• Saving us hundreds of hours over the course of the next year doing daily manual optimization and budget management tasks for us so we can focus on strategy and testing new things

Incentivized