TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Drupal

    Score6.9 out of 10
    N/ADrupal is a free, open-source content management system written in PHP that competes primarily with Joomla and Plone. The standard release of Drupal, known as Drupal core, contains basic features such as account and menu management, RSS feeds, page layout customization, and system administration.N/A

    ExpressionEngine

    Score10 out of 10
    N/AExpressionEngine is a content management system from EllisLab in 2002, a successor to pMachine Pro, a blogging system, which is written in object-oriented PHP and uses MySQL for data storage. ExpressionEngine is their flagship Content Delivery Platform.

    $249

    per year

    Pricing
    DrupalExpressionEngine
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    License
    $299.00
    One Time Fee
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    DrupalExpressionEngine
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    DrupalExpressionEngine
    Considered Both Products
    Drupal.org
    Chose Drupal
    We have used many content management systems — WordPress, Wix, Squarespace, ExpressionEngine, and more. Drupal is more powerful and flexible than most.
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    WordPress would be the best alternative to Drupal that I've seen, but in my experience, Drupal is better at complex websites that need a lot of customization. WordPress would be much better suited for a blog than Drupal.

    I only briefly looked at Joomla, and I wasn't impressed.
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    WordPress, Joomla, Expression Engine, Umbraco, Rails.
    Incentivized
    Open Source
    Chose ExpressionEngine
    I feel ExpressionEngine is on par with the major CMS systems, WordPress, Drupal, and Craft. It's used by many companies exclusively and is trustworthy. Lately, I've been building more sites with WordPress and still prefer how ExpressionEngine handles certain aspects, such as …
    Incentivized
    Chose ExpressionEngine
    wordpress, drupal
    Incentivized
    Chose ExpressionEngine
    The learning curve on EE was less intense than those for Zend Framework, drupal or WordPress. Setup and config for highly-custom sites is quicker and quite simple. Having the ability to quickly make the control panel UI look nice for end-users is a huge plus and is often …
    Chose ExpressionEngine
    Before using EE, I had experience with WordPress and Acquia Drupal. ExpressionEngine, in my opinion, is easier to learn and use than Drupal, but not more than WordPress. Additionally, it is more secure than either of the other two. However, I also found it less well documented …
    Chose ExpressionEngine
    Looking at Drupal (as an open source alternative), we felt it was too constrained in its templates. We know that you can build any sort of site with Drupal, but out of the box, it felt like we were being shoved into various blocks in the pages, and we didn't like that.
    Chose ExpressionEngine
    EE has a very basic setup, where as wordpress and drupal, you're working to fit your design in the structure, EE lets you fit the CMS in your design.
    Chose ExpressionEngine
    It would be my third option
    Incentivized
    Chose ExpressionEngine
    As previously mentioned, the UI/UX of EE is leagues beyond any other CMS I have used before. This is essential for client use.
    Incentivized
    Chose ExpressionEngine
    ExpressionEngine was selected prior to my hiring. We are likely switching from ExpresionEngine to WordPress or Drupal in the near future to save money on custom modules.
    Incentivized
    Chose ExpressionEngine
    Before finding ExpressionEngine, I'd always been frustrated by the shoddy, convoluted front-end code created by other content manage systems or their plugins. ExpressionEngine does a fantastic job in separating the content from the code, allowing you to build custom templates …
    Incentivized
    Chose ExpressionEngine
    WordPress: When I bought Expression Engine, WordPress didn't have the member management features of EE. They've now caught up on that score. EE still beats WP on templating and design options. WordPress has a much strong community. WordPress is more likely to be a hacking …
    Chose ExpressionEngine
    ExpressionEngine is great from easy of use, I feel like there is functionality from member groups that it could really benefit from.
    Chose ExpressionEngine
    As stated previously, EE allows you to fully customize the structure of your site and CMS. WordPress comes with more built-in functionality out of the box, while Drupal is somewhere in between the two.
    Chose ExpressionEngine
    While other options can be cheap or free, EE costs a bit. However, it isn't as expensive as a product like Sitefinity. It's secure. Reliable. Stable. Has a very supportive and talented community of developers and designers. And it's very scalable. I call it the Honda of content …
    Chose ExpressionEngine
    Wordpress - back end CMS coding in EE is much nicer than the Wordpress. It is not a system to build layouts - something like Drupal might work better. Define the editable regions beforehand - customers wanting to design their own site within the CMS might need to look elsewhere.
    Chose ExpressionEngine
    I would recommend it over let's say:

    • Simple
    Chose ExpressionEngine
    I've used WordPress for much smaller sites with a very limited budget and fast turn-around time. WordPress does well at installing, adding a theme, minor customizations and launch in a very fast timeframe. This can all be realistically done in a single sitting. ExpressionEngine …
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    DrupalExpressionEngine
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Drupal and ExpressionEngine
    Feature
    Drupal
    2.0
    66 Ratings
    ExpressionEngine
    10.0
    35 Ratings
    Role-based user permissions2.066 Ratings10.035 Ratings
    Platform & Infrastructure
    Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Drupal and ExpressionEngine
    Feature
    Drupal
    7.7
    63 Ratings
    ExpressionEngine
    9.4
    28 Ratings
    API9.358 Ratings9.024 Ratings
    Internationalization / multi-language6.054 Ratings9.722 Ratings
    Web Content Creation
    Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Drupal and ExpressionEngine
    Feature
    Drupal
    5.3
    69 Ratings
    ExpressionEngine
    8.9
    35 Ratings
    WYSIWYG editor1.062 Ratings9.132 Ratings
    Code quality / cleanliness9.366 Ratings10.034 Ratings
    Admin section3.069 Ratings9.134 Ratings
    Page templates4.068 Ratings8.129 Ratings
    Library of website themes3.059 Ratings7.011 Ratings
    Mobile optimization / responsive design10.063 Ratings9.917 Ratings
    Publishing workflow9.367 Ratings9.027 Ratings
    Form generator3.064 Ratings9.420 Ratings
    Web Content Management
    Comparison of Web Content Management features of Drupal and ExpressionEngine
    Feature
    Drupal
    5.0
    68 Ratings
    ExpressionEngine
    9.4
    35 Ratings
    Content taxonomy10.063 Ratings10.027 Ratings
    SEO support1.063 Ratings10.027 Ratings
    Bulk management10.059 Ratings9.129 Ratings
    Availability / breadth of extensions2.062 Ratings8.034 Ratings
    Community / comment management2.062 Ratings9.931 Ratings
    User Ratings
    DrupalExpressionEngine
    Likelihood to Recommend
    2.0
    (78 ratings)
    10.0
    (63 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.2
    (18 ratings)
    9.2
    (36 ratings)
    Usability
    3.0
    (10 ratings)
    5.3
    (6 ratings)
    Availability
    9.7
    (3 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    8.9
    (2 ratings)
    2.8
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.0
    (4 ratings)
    6.2
    (4 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    5.1
    (4 ratings)
    6.9
    (3 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)