Drupal vs. Sitecore Digital Experience Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Drupal
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Drupal is a free, open-source content management system written in PHP that competes primarily with Joomla and Plone. The standard release of Drupal, known as Drupal core, contains basic features such as account and menu management, RSS feeds, page layout customization, and system administration.N/A
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
The Sitecore Experience Platform (Sitecore XP) is a digital experience platform used to build websites and create customer experiences online. The solution boasts fast content authoring, built-in personalization features, testing and other optimizations, as well as analytics and marketing features.N/A
Pricing
DrupalSitecore Digital Experience Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DrupalSitecore Digital Experience Platform
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DrupalSitecore Digital Experience Platform
Considered Both Products
Drupal
Chose Drupal
Drupal excels at allowing seasoned programmers to really get creative with marketing initiatives in terms of working with a theme and the core code. That being said, it is definitely much more challenging for average developers and front-end builders to use, especially at …
Chose Drupal
Drupal has some advantages and disadvantages when stacked up against Wordpress,, including that Wordpress is easier to user for beginners and requires less training to get started. I noticed that while using Drupal, more help and assistance was needed from developers to make …
Chose Drupal
Drupal can be more complex to learn, but it offers a much wider range of applications. Drupal’s front and backend can be customized from design to functionality to allow for a wide range of uses. If someone wants to create something more complex than a simple site or blog, …
Chose Drupal
I inherited Drupal from a developer who made the website for our nonprofit many years ago. It was increasingly obvious that it wasn't a fit for our organization, which has multiple staff and volunteers who need to edit or update the website but don't have coding experience. Wix …
Chose Drupal
Drupal requires less to no coding abilities to spin up sites.
Even if someone is preparing to develop sites that require technical know how then Drupal provides role based systems to seperate developers from content writers.
Drupal 8 and 9 now have a vast array of plugins. Now …
Chose Drupal
WordPress for sure has a bigger community, a lot of paid extensions which sometimes is easier to purchase and get started, a lot of pre-designed templates to get you going, but nowadays with the scale of the projects we've been working with, and the need for custom-tailored …
Chose Drupal
Drupal's commerce module features custom e-commerce functionality, allowing for customization that fits our commercial enterprise model.
Chose Drupal
We use both, for different projects (Joomla and Drupal). Drupal proved to be more robust, more secure and more integrable with PHP applications.
Drupal requires a more senior technical team but allows for more complex activities. It's great if you have a medium to a large …
Chose Drupal
We first had a WordPress-based website, that evolved to a custom third-party developed content management system. In both cases, that involved additional costs for any change request, any security or any scalability need.
WordPress didn't meet enterprise requirements. That also …
Chose Drupal
Drupal is community-backed making it more accessible and growing at a faster rate than Sitefinity which is a proprietary product built on .NET. Drupal is PHP-based using some but not all Symphony codebase. Updates for Drupal are frequent and so are feature adds.
Chose Drupal
Drupal is far more usable and stable than Joomla!, and the developer community support is significantly stronger. While Drupal is often compared to WordPress, they are fundamentally different platforms, and in most projects, it's very clear when the requirements are beyond what …
Chose Drupal
We were looking for an open source CMS. WordPress wasn't powerful enough for our needs. Joomla was too difficult for our team to use.
Chose Drupal
We have used many content management systems — WordPress, Wix, Squarespace, ExpressionEngine, and more. Drupal is more powerful and flexible than most.
Chose Drupal
We did a comparison of Drupal against Joomla, WordPress, and Ingeniux. We found that its multiple themes available for web pages, user management, comment management, and form generation stands apart from its competitors.
Chose Drupal
I've used Wordpress sparingly when helping a client with an existing website. I find it much less powerful and robust, and frankly confusing. The way Wordpress websites are set up in the backend doesn't make sense to me after getting used to how Drupal is set up. They're …
Chose Drupal
Drupal is really the only well-supported open-source CMS that is designed for large, data-rich websites. There just really weren't any good alternatives. There are plenty of CMSs that excel at small to medium-sized websites. But for a large website with lots of structured data, …
Chose Drupal
Although Drupal is not the most used, it has great performance and is more used in professional projects. It allows us to expand without starting from scratch.
Chose Drupal
Security-wise and traffic-wise Drupal is built to handle a lot. While the other platforms mentioned ( mainly Wordpress ) are great and have a large community, I would only use Drupal for an Enterprise level platform to build a website on. I first learned about Drupal about 10 …
Chose Drupal
Drupal supports lots of devices like Mac, Windows, Linux etc. easily, and it is an open source product so there's no cost required. Lots of other products require purchasing, costing a high amount. The support system of Drupal is also good in comparison to other products. The …
Chose Drupal
Drupal is certainly a more complex animal, comparatively. But its power lies in its flexibility, extensibility, and stability. And the API is fantastic. There's really nothing else like it.
Chose Drupal
I selected Drupal because of the simplicity upon going live. "Simple" is not the word I would use prior to the site going live though. I have used Jumla (which I believe was part of Drupal as one CMS about 12 or 15 years ago). Jumla is almost identical in capabilities to …
Chose Drupal
In my mind, Drupal and WordPress are the top open source CMSes, and I rarely recommend not going with an open source CMS. WordPress can be great, especially for single developers, but I find that the code structure and extensibility of Drupal makes it superior for many use …
Chose Drupal
I've used Squarespace and Wordpress for other businesses, and Drupal was honestly selected due to cost. It does a good job of scaling across our organization - and many units have benefited from having a space to provide content. Squarespace is more modern, and Wordpress may …
Chose Drupal
Drupal has strong role-based permissions for users, powerful content blocks for editing, and granular customizing options in their views. For a company or organization requiring a lot of customization, Drupal can be a really powerful tool. However, Drupal does require …
Chose Drupal
We've used ION and WordPress. However, Drupal tends to be more customizable, secure, and overall more professional in the website-building business.
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
The XM cloud technology stack is ahead of the platforms and its data structure is easier to learn.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Adobe Marketo Engage is a fantastic product for managing campaigns and audience segmentations syncing with Adobe Audience Manager. It also has OOTB connectivity to very popular CRM platforms. Adobe Analytics and Adobe Target are pretty similar to Sitecore CDP/Personalize. Any …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Other tools lack one or the other and fail to provide a comprehensive best experience for everyone - content authors, marketers and developers. Sitecore comes with out of the box authoring host, best content authoring and WYSIWYG editing experience and much more.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Really the only comparable product to Sitecore DXP is Adobe Experience Manager. Both are very well established and robust content management platforms. Products like Contentful and Contentstack are very lightweight and do not have as many built-in features like DXP, so it is …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Its is simply by far the most advanced system. Using other CMS you will soon be blocked with advanced customizations specially to their back office but Sitecore enables you to do whatever you want and hook into the pipelines and embed your own code/business logic.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
I haven't used other DXPs in that great detail to provide a holistic comparison between it and Sitecore. Overall, I feel every product has its pros and cons. With Sitecore, I feel they are always innovating and coming up with new solutions to help the partners deliver the best …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Adobe Experience Manager, Acquia Digital Experience Platform, Optimizely Content Management System, WordPress and Kentico Xperience
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
We experienced issues with this CMS and thus switched from Sitecore Experience Platform to AEM and both of them have their own pro and cons.
While Sitecore Experience Platform provides flexibility to copy properties from one page to other, AEM doesnot allow that.. we need to …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
The main reason to use Sitecore Experience Manager is if you want to develop something completely custom. Sitecore is best suited for very robust, multi-page websites. If you need to build out a website that supports multiple product lines, Sitecore could be a good option.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
All of these platforms have their pros and cons. Selecting the best fit is a matter aligning corporate need vs features provided. Have a .NET shop with an advanced marketing team looking to push UX forward and willing to pay a premium, then Sitecore may be the right fit. …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
After evaluating OpenText, we found that Sitecore has stronger capabilities to utilize the content for personalization and contextual marketing. We also favored Sitecore's user permissions, roles, and content creation processes out of the box.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Sitecore was evaluated by our practice next to two other Content management systems 4 years ago. Sitecore scored the highest following a series of questions related to product stability, scalability, ease of use, and a host of other categories.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
WordPress and Wix are great solutions for a small business or a solopreneur who's just looking to get a simple website up and running. For larger businesses with more robust content, I think Sitecore offers a bit more flexibility. Wix and Wordpress are both really simple to get …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Sitecore provides and enterprise grade CMS over Wordpress and allow us to do the customization we need for our unique environment. Optimizely might be better for AB testing.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Wordpress is easier than Sitecore. Drupal has more functionality and more support. Joomla also has more support.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Sitefinity is improving but at the time of decision making it had nothing that could compare with the A/B testing and personalisation features that Sitecore offers. This was a key differentiator and ultimately ensured Sitecore was purchased. Wordpress isn't really comparable …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Launchrock, Webdam, eZ, crownpeak, SignalMind
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Based on my perspective these are the main reasons for choosing Sitecore over others.
  • It is a one-stop shop for all customer engagement platforms with a lot of developer communities over the web.
  • It is a .NET based platform as there are a lot of .Net developers in the market.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
The decision to select Sitecore was not ultimately mine, but the fact that we were able to leverage in-house Microsoft .Net (C#) experience on a platform that had a library of extensions, but also allowed us to customize and keep private our confidential IP has been a big help. …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Of all the competitors listed above, Sitecore owned, by far, the best combination of power, easy-of-use, and extensibility. It easily outperformed the other paid-for CMS systems. Its power is especially noticeable in its ability to handle very complex workflows, security …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Even though sitecore is not an open source program it's offering was valuable enough to make us choose it.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
I have used an in-house CMS and the Amaxus CMS. Sitecore is a great balance of these two. The in-house CMS was VERY user friendly, for the least technical client. It showed the actual page you were editing and allowed you to basically edit the text on the page, no HTML …
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
Every product has a cost window it fits in. Umbraco is perfect for small to mid-enterprise implementations. However Sitecore is more stable from a developement standpoint.
Chose Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
For us, Sitecore was all about the integration possibilities and a CMS that empowered our staff to get their information published online in a timely fashion. At the time SiteFinity was still early in its development. Sitecore was a more mature product with many more features.
Features
DrupalSitecore Digital Experience Platform
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Drupal
2.0
Ratings
121% below category average
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
9.8
Ratings
18% above category average
Role-based user permissions2.00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Drupal
7.7
Ratings
1% above category average
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
9.7
Ratings
15% above category average
API9.30 Ratings9.90 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language6.00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Drupal
5.3
Ratings
37% below category average
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
8.9
Ratings
15% above category average
WYSIWYG editor1.00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness9.30 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Admin section3.00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Page templates4.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Library of website themes3.00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design10.00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Publishing workflow9.30 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Form generator3.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Drupal
5.0
Ratings
38% below category average
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
9.2
Ratings
24% above category average
Content taxonomy10.00 Ratings9.40 Ratings
SEO support1.00 Ratings9.30 Ratings
Bulk management10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions2.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Community / comment management2.00 Ratings9.60 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Drupal
-
Ratings
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
7.5
Ratings
13% below category average
Conversion tracking00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Test reporting00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Funnel Analysis00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
User Segmentation00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Digital Experience Platform
Comparison of Digital Experience Platform features of Product A and Product B
Drupal
-
Ratings
Sitecore Digital Experience Platform
8.0
Ratings
14% below category average
Campaign management00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Cloud enablement00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Content aggregation00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Content classification00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Multi-channel content personalization00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customer data analytics00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
DXP Third-Party Integrations00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Multi-website management00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Digital asset management00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Editorial workflows and task management00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Best Alternatives
DrupalSitecore Digital Experience Platform
Small Businesses
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
RWS Tridion Sites
RWS Tridion Sites
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DrupalSitecore Digital Experience Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
2.0
(0 ratings)
9.4
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
3.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
6.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
5.1
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DrupalSitecore Digital Experience Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
We developed a corporate website using Drupal, which features a large number of static pages and several dynamic functions, including a contact us form, location finder, and job posting. We utilized Drupal with some customization to achieve the desired functionalities. We have also worked on e-commerce sites using Drupal, and there is a scope for improvements, specifically in cataloging.
Read full review
Having worked with other DXP platforms, I find Sitecore to be the most suitable for enterprise-level clients. The platform is highly flexible - both customizable and extendable - making it adaptable to any customer needs or requirements. The platform focuses on the success of both marketing and technical teams, which I don't see on other platforms.
Read full review
Pros
  • Content Types... these are amazing. Whereas a more simplistic CMS like Wordpress will basically allow you to make posts and build pages, Drupal 8 gives you the ability to define different types of content that behave differently, and are served up differently in different areas of the website.
  • Extensibility... it scales, ohhhh does it scale. They've really figured out server-side caching, and it makes all the difference. Once a page has been cached, it's available instantly to all users worldwide; and when coupled with AWS, global redundancy and localization mean that no matter where you're accessing the site, it always loads fast and crisp.
  • Workflows... you have the ability to define very specific roles and/or user-based editorial workflows, allowing for as many touchpoints and reviews between content creation and publication as you'll require.
Read full review
  • Customer Profiles - the ability to identify key features on the site and flag those interactions to tie customer visits back to specific persona types.
  • Lead Scoring - the ability to establish a funnel for leads and use this funnel to assign a score or qualification within the sales funnel.
  • Personalization - the ability to tailor experiences to unique customer segments based on their needs, identifiying and optimizing the experience in real-time.
Read full review
Cons
  • Security and new release notifications are a hassle as they happen too often
  • Allowing them to write PHP modules is a big advantage, but sometimes integrating them is a small challenge due to the version the developer is working on.
  • Steep learning curve, but worth it
Read full review
  • Sitecore is complicated. Software developers need (costly) training to get the most value out of it and business users do not find it intuitive to use. Concepts like the content tree can be difficult for the business users to grasp.
  • Despite everything being possible in Sitecore, virtually nothing comes out of the box - you need to develop every component and do so within a defined process and framework, which can be a fairly big development overhead.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I really like Drupal, and besides the one major issue with not being able to update from version 6 to version 7 and I am happy to continuing using it. Hopefully as time goes on they will make it easier to upgrade or provide better tools for mid-level web designers like myself to build out new sites without the help of expensive 3rd party's.
Read full review
Sitecore has proven that it can deliver on its promise of a robust, reliable enterprise CMS solution with plenty of features. Also, they keep updating it with more and better features. Now that we are highly trained on it we have started on getting the most out of it and we plan to keep doing more of that in the future.
Read full review
Usability
It has a very steep learning curve. When starting with Drupal, the functionality and setup have to be learned, which is complex in comparison to tools like WordPress. Drupal is more powerful and can create a wider range of applications, but it definitely has a learning curve. I would recommend it to anyone who wants to make a dynamic web application bigger than the scale of a WordPress blog.
Read full review
Once you learn how to use the platform and can put a solid strategy in place to manage it long-term, it becomes a lot easier to use. The tricky part is working with resources who are familiar with the platform to navigate some of the common implementation and configuration pitfalls. Although Sitecore has worked very hard to overcome some of these from their earlier product versions by creating wizards and improving their support documentation, at the end of the day it is still a very complex and powerful system that needs to be implemented carefully in order to foster the best possible user experience for authors. So it could be rated very usable or not usable at all based on how much planning took place and the quality of the implementation.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Drupal itself does not tend to have bugs that cause sporadic outages. When deployed on a well-configured LAMP stack, deployment and maintenance problems are minimal, and in general no exotic tuning or configuration is required. For highest uptime, putting a caching proxy like Varnish in front of Drupal (or a CDN that supports dynamic applications).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Drupal page loads can be slow, as a great many database calls may be required to generate a page. It is highly recommended to use caching systems, both built-in and external to lessen such database loads and improve performance. I haven't had any problems with behind-the-scenes integrations with external systems.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
As noted earlier, the support of the community can be rather variable, with some modules attracting more attraction and action in their issue queues, but overall, the development community for Drupal is second to none. It probably the single greatest aspect of being involved in this open-source project.
Read full review
1. Customized software development & maintenance. 2. Technology Consulting - Consulting-based services for technology solutions data engineering or cloud solutions. 3. Used for tapping into multiple data sources such as CRM and marketing automation systems and, creating automated data extracts with a high-end visual representation of data. 4. Implemented for scheduling an existing report to automatically refresh and be delivered to specific users at a specific regular interval.
Read full review
In-Person Training
I was part of the team that conducted the training. Our training was fine, but we could have been better informed on Drupal before we started providing it. If we did not have answers to tough questions, we had more technical staff we could consult with. We did provide hands-on practice time for the learners, which I would always recommend. That is where the best learning occurred.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
The on-line training was not as ideal as the face-to-face training. It was done remotely and only allowed for the trainers to present information to the learners and demonstrate the platform online. There was not a good way to allow for the learners to practice, ask questions and have them answered all in the same session.
Read full review
Sitecore captures and remembers every single interaction your customers and prospects have in any part of the system, allowing you to build comprehensive, ever-learning profiles of each individual. From email marketing, to social media, to online shopping, Sitecore remembers where each interaction left off so you can automatically continue the conversation. Sitecore helps you manage your content for each and every experience your customers enjoy. Customize what content you want and the system will take care of how it's displayed.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Plan ahead as much you can. You really need to know how to build what you want with the modules available to you, or that you might need to code yourself, in order to make the best use of Drupal. I recommend you analyze the most technically difficult workflows and other aspects of your implementation, and try building some test versions of those first. Get feedback from stakeholders early and often, because you can easily find yourself in a situation where your implementation does 90% of what you want, but, due to something you didn't plan for, foresee, or know about, there's no feasible way to get past the last 10%
Read full review
We implemented Sitecore on an Agile project team, which worked very well. We worked closely with the stakeholders for each feature and all features and user stories were prioritized outside of the development team. Anyone trying to implement a website of this magnitude should definitely attempt to do so in as much an Agile fashion as possible.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Drupal's capabilities outpace WordPress by miles. Drupal is more customizable, scales better for larger companies and has advanced content types. If you own a small business or work at a startup company, I would recommend WordPress but if your firm is trying to scale and you have more than 50 employees I would recommend Drupal.
Read full review
Adobe Marketo Engage is a fantastic product for managing campaigns and audience segmentations syncing with Adobe Audience Manager. It also has OOTB connectivity to very popular CRM platforms. Adobe Analytics and Adobe Target are pretty similar to Sitecore CDP/Personalize. Any custom/extension implementation required in the Adobe space has the same complexity as Sitecore.
Read full review
Scalability
Drupal is well known to be scalable, although it requires solid knowledge of MySQL best practices, caching mechanisms, and other server-level best practices. I have never personally dealt with an especially large site, so I can speak well to the issues associated with Drupal scaling.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Drupal helped us launch a creative, marketing- and product-focused website with custom coding integrations tailored to our goals.
  • Drupal allows us to rely on secure and consistently updated core code.
  • Drupal's code taxing on the server does start to get a bit heavy as you go along with customizations, so at some point, we decided to stop. We want to ensure our Google Page Score remains high, including paying close attention to page load speed.
Read full review
  • Headless capabilities have enabled us to use our favorite frontend framework for rapid development and faster feature rollouts.
  • Our team's productivity have improved significantly and we have no hassle to deploy new features.
  • We are able to extend the feature set as per our own needs which gives us great flexibility and competitive advantage.
Read full review
ScreenShots