EARLY vs. Timely

Really focused on using within a desktop environment rather than on the road (although there is a mobile app to use as an alternate). The tangible feel of the device on the desk makes it really easy to switch between tracking activities without interfering with your ongoing work. You need to carefully consider what activities to track as there are only 8 options.

Incentivized

Timely is suited for organizations that prefer time tracking on remote workers. Timely is not suitable for organizations where the majority of the employees are in office.

Incentivized

• Very easy to switch between activities
• Immediate availability of dashboard data
• Avoids the clutter of more pc based programmes

Incentivized

• Clear visualization of tasks and contribution.
• Clear deadlines for each step of the project.
• Transparency and communication.

Incentivized

• Greater range of reusable activity icon stickers

Incentivized

• I have to manually add the hex# for colors every time I add a new sub item to a client (that is so annoying)
• The general UX/UI for admin is rough

Incentivized

For admin its not great but for the team it is fairly straight forward I think. The reports are clunky at times, if I have something pulled up on a tab then go into a different tab and back into the Timely tab, whatever I had up is gone, etc.

Incentivized

I have tried pc based software equivalents including Toggl but managing it on the pc workstation makes it just another software item. I selected Timeular because it is a tangible item on my desk. This "breaks" the connection with the PC and means I am far less likely to track my activity throughout the day.

Incentivized

Timely does not provide recurring event tracking.

Incentivized

• Positive improvement in my time management
• Makes it easier to work in bitesize chunks
• Helps with focus on specific activiries

Incentivized

• Productivity increase
• Team and personal accountability

Incentivized