Ebbot vs. Genesys DX (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Ebbot
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
Ebbot, headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden, offers their chatbot designed to support the customer support experience by understanding customer questions with natural language processing and AI.
$590
per month per user
Genesys DX (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Genesys DX was a live chat engagement and chatbot AI solution based on Bold360, acquired by Genesys. It is no longer available.N/A
Pricing
EbbotGenesys DX (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
Starter
590 kr
per month per user
Professional
890 kr
per month per user
Enterprise
Custom
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
EbbotGenesys DX (discontinued)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
EbbotGenesys DX (discontinued)
Considered Both Products
Ebbot

No answer on this topic

Genesys DX (discontinued)
Chose Genesys DX (discontinued)
When comparing against other chat bot providers, we found the Bold360 user interface to be more user friendly on both the setup and customer facing sides.
Chose Genesys DX (discontinued)
Bold360 offers an increased level of customization in the following areas for almost the same price:
  • Reporting
  • Channeling to different agent groups
Chose Genesys DX (discontinued)
Userlike was a live-chat-only product, which we replaced with Bold360 because of the additional possibility of a pre-activated bot. When using live chat only, Userlike is as good as Bold360.
Chose Genesys DX (discontinued)
Oracle | IBM | Adobe
Chose Genesys DX (discontinued)
Each is unique in [its] own way but we wanted something powerful and easy for the people performing day-to-day tasks within it. We didn't want to always have to rely on IT to not only develop but also maintain the solution and therefore adding an unnecessary dependency on the …
Chose Genesys DX (discontinued)
Bold360 is flexible, fairly easy to integrate, and very much aimed at customer service, which made it an ideal fit.
Many other vendors don't have the customer-facing functionality of Bold360.
Chose Genesys DX (discontinued)
Increased our potential for scale and improved analytics, which helped drive more customer focus within our business.
Chose Genesys DX (discontinued)
Zendesk Explore, Zendesk Chat (formerly Zopim), Zendesk Guide and Zendesk Talk
Chose Genesys DX (discontinued)
I used LivePerson in my previous company. It was the same as BoldChat in terms of being a standalone chat application. But when I started using Bold360, for the very first time I felt I'd found a tool that made chat a really good channel for communications.
Chose Genesys DX (discontinued)
Bold360 is very comfortable to use and the look of the software always make us fresh and feel good to work.
Chose Genesys DX (discontinued)
I have not used other products.
Chose Genesys DX (discontinued)
We went with Bold360 because it fit our needs best, the cost was right, and the ease of use and implementation looked better to all of us than the competition. The web team knew of Bold360 by reputation. I liked the ease of use and the low time investment from an admin point …
Chose Genesys DX (discontinued)
Boldchat has a lot more options thus making Boldchat more complicated to use than Bold360. But since Bold360 is a simpler system, it cannot do all the things that Boldchat can use. That is why we have not stopped using Boldchat. Our lesser experienced and part-time reps use the …
Chose Genesys DX (discontinued)
Ihelp was used prior to Bold360. Prior to Bold360 Frontier Communications utilized Bold for the past 2 years. Frontier Communications was a test center for Bold 360 December 2018 and were rewarded by being able to test and provide feedback prior to 360 activations. Management …
Chose Genesys DX (discontinued)
Bold360 ranks as easy to use, and provides instant communication.
Chose Genesys DX (discontinued)
We used Orcale prior to switching to the BoldChat Desktop Application Operator Client and then to Bold360. I have no other experience and can say that the BoldChat Desktop Application Operator Client although was tough to get used to, has become a comprehensive tool which I …
Chose Genesys DX (discontinued)
None that I can think of.
Chose Genesys DX (discontinued)
Zendesk was selected after Bold360 for another segment of our websites. At the moment when we evaluated chat providers we had some basic chat needs/functions:
  • Reliability
  • Custom design options for chat windows/chat buttons
Best Alternatives
EbbotGenesys DX (discontinued)
Small Businesses
Front
Front
Score 7.1 out of 10
Gist
Gist
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Genesys DX (discontinued)
Genesys DX (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Olark
Olark
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Genesys DX (discontinued)
Genesys DX (discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Front
Front
Score 7.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
EbbotGenesys DX (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
EbbotGenesys DX (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
The relationship building with the entire team at LMI from Sales, to the Account Manager to our Customer Relationship manager and their product Bold360 was excellent. They were always willing to listen to different ideas and try to make them work for us
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • We’ve built our environment to scale globally and currently leveraging the platform in U.S., LATAM, BRAZIL, APAC, and EMEA.
  • Email integration with Outlook has helped channel emails to agents by skill set.
  • The knowledgebase has shared global articles, which are auto-translated to our fans who engage our brands based on their questions.
  • I want to add kudos to the support received from our Customer Success Manager and Technical Account Manager.
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Reporting capabilities. I think the dashboard and reporting tool could contain more details in terms of what data is visible and available to the user/administrator.
  • Native mobile applications to provide added support.
  • Improving the beta testing program to use new features before understanding whether the update can be pushed out without causing issues with the end-user.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Day-to-day use of Bold360 AI (chatbot) use (reviewing new questions, adding new responses, tagging, etc.) is fairly simple, but utilizing more advanced features and custom channeling, etc. typically require escalation to developers and may require additional costs if you want help to implement
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
The Bold360 team has been supportive throughout the process. My reason for providing the 8 rating is due to the training curriculum. I believe Bold should work closely with the client to determine what training would best support the customer's needs.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
Each is unique in [its] own way but we wanted something powerful and easy for the people performing day-to-day tasks within it. We didn't want to always have to rely on IT to not only develop but also maintain the solution and therefore adding an unnecessary dependency on the opportunity the platform can provide to its users. We also wanted a native live chat platform within it, rather [than] further customization to integrate with another solution provider.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Considerable saving on ticket deflection so return on investment
  • Saved on extra support engineer recruitment through self service
  • Enabled support engineers to concentrate on more complex customer issues as simple and semi-complex issues are generally dealt with through self service--so better quality of service for customers
Read full review
ScreenShots