Edgenexus Load Balancer/ADC vs. HAProxy Community Edition

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Edgenexus Load Balancer/ADC
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$1,942.50
one-time fee
HAProxy Community Edition
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
HAProxy Community Edition is a free, open source reverse-proxy offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications. It is presented as suited for very high traffic web sites.N/A
Pricing
Edgenexus Load Balancer/ADCHAProxy Community Edition
Editions & Modules
Basic
$1,942.50
one-time fee
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Edgenexus Load Balancer/ADCHAProxy Community Edition
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Edgenexus Load Balancer/ADCHAProxy Community Edition
User Ratings
Edgenexus Load Balancer/ADCHAProxy Community Edition
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Edgenexus Load Balancer/ADCHAProxy Community Edition
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
It prevents a single server failure from being a downtime event by adding redundancy to every layer of your architecture. A load balancer facilitates redundancy for the backend layer (web/app servers), but for a true high availability setup, you need to have redundant load balancers as well. So it is well suited for all production related servers and less suited for individual servers that do not require redundancy.
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • Allow traffic to systems to be distributed evenly, providing high availability
  • Allow restrictions to resources using OAuth tokens
  • Allow load balancing of databases
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • My understanding is a lack of support for UDP traffic
  • One mistake in the haproxy.cfg prevents the entire thing from starting rather than only affecting the part of the config file that may have a typo of some other syntax problem.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
It is very easy to use. I was able to find a lot of documents for it on the internet. Very good community support. There are lots of examples available to try. We mostly use a command-line user interface to interact with it. The CLI is also super easy to use and very easy to interact with
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
We haven't used customer support. We mostly used the community version. We build a multi-node HAProxy cluster with HA to the proxy itself using opensource plugins available. With the support available on the internet and the documents available we don't need to use much customer support.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
We chose HA Proxy because it is cheaper than a hardware balancer, it is an open-source solution with a large community behind it and with constant updates. It also allows custom scripts according to needs.HA Proxy is a solution used in many internet sites like GitHub, Reddit, Twitter, and Tuenti.
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Significantly lower investment vs competitors. In the case of F5s we have Virtual Editions so we're paying for the hardware to run it on top of the several thousand dollar licenses that are required for each pair and we currently have a pair of F5s per client so there's a huge potential for cost savings there.
  • Requires our network engineers to learn a new skill or our Systems engineers to take on the responsibility of managing the load balancers. It's not a huge difference either way, but it does impact the way we have done business in the past.
Read full review
ScreenShots