Elasticsearch

Elasticsearch

208 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Elasticsearch	Score8.6 out of 10	N/A	Elasticsearch is an enterprise search tool from Elastic in Mountain View, California.	$16 per month

Pricing

Elasticsearch

Standard: $16.00
per month
Gold: $19.00
per month
Platinum: $22.00
per month
Enterprise: Contact Sales

Pricing Offerings
Elasticsearch
Free Trial
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No

No setup fee

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Elasticsearch
Considered Both Products	Elastic Verified User Chose Elasticsearch Elasticsearch has a steep learning curve, but it is the best in terms of customization and use cases it can cover most of the business needs. The other tools might be easier to integrate with and start seeing results, but you will end up having issues when you need customized … Incentivized Helpful? Julie Zhong Data analytics in Engineering at Netnordic (Information Technology & Services, 201-500 employees) Chose Elasticsearch Elasticsearch is relatedly cheaper the splunk. OpenSearch is good and we migrated some data into it but the critical data stays in elasticsearch as it has formal support. Incentivized Helpful? John Anderson Lead Application Engineer IV in Information Technology at Cox Communications (Telecommunications, 10,001+ employees) Chose Elasticsearch They all have their specific pros and cons. Elastic was actually initially brought in to provide less expensive functionality to Splunk, and Splunk use cases. Grafana was brought in to provide less expensive visualizations compared to Splunk and Elastic...I would recommend … Incentivized Helpful? Borislav Traykov DevOps Team Leader in Engineering at Cognyte (Information Technology & Services, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Elasticsearch Elasticsearch is the most well-known and supported free data platform that we identified. We are taking advantage of community knowledge and practices. In terms of flexibility and breadth of use cases no other competitor came close to Elasticsearch. We've tried Solr in the past … Incentivized Helpful? Oscar Narváez Del Rio Tools & Analytic Monitoring Leader in Information Technology at Entel (Telecommunications, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose Elasticsearch Elasticsearch brings the capacity to grow data ingest and provides 24/7 visibility into critical services across IT and Business teams. With Elasticsarch, specialized support teams can easily view all the relevant information by using real-time dashboards, and can immediately … Incentivized Helpful? Keith Lubell Chief Technology Officer in Information Technology at Berkery, Noyes & Co., LLC (Financial Services, 51-200 employees) Chose Elasticsearch Elasticsearch and Solr are both based on Lucene, but the user community for Elasticsearch is much stronger, and setting up a cluster is easier. Splunk is very well suited for Log indexing and searching but is not nearly as flexible as Elasticsearch. Couchbase is a great NoSQL … Incentivized Helpful? Swastik Nath Data Scientist in Information Technology at Intelligent Retail Pvt. Ltd. (Retail, 51-200 employees) Chose Elasticsearch Search and analytics capabilities of Elasticsearch are superior to its competitors. Being open source, it is a cheaper and faster solution than other competitors. Installation is straightforward and it can be potentially deployed anywhere and everywhere! There is no need for … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Elasticsearch Faster, better, more efficient. There was no comparison in Elasticsearch vs LEM. AlienVault was decent but too expensive for what it does compared to Elastic. The only competitor I'd consider as in the same ballpark in the SIEM world is Splunk. Save yourself the money and get a … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Elasticsearch I think Elasticseach works less great compared to Splunk. Mainly the way the Splunk search head works is vastly superior to the way the Elasticsearch query language works. Furthermore, the Splunk architecture is in my opinion easier to roll out and scale-up. Splunk also has a … Incentivized Helpful? Maria Sousa Managing Engineer in Engineering at Carrilho Engineering (Telecommunications, 11-50 employees) Chose Elasticsearch Elasticsearch is very well packed in a broad set of features, ranging from customization capabilities to security and add-ons, and also comes with a great visualization tool named Kibana. Most of the competitors are strong in some of these areas, but I know of no other that's … Incentivized Helpful? Mark Freeman, MBA Director Enterprise Architectures in Information Technology at DTCC (Financial Services, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Elasticsearch SharePoint seems antiquated. Amazon Elastic File System is hard to find things. Google Search Appliance does ranking poorly. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Elasticsearch Elasticsearch is more expensive, especially on disk storage. In terms of functionality and ease of use, it's better than most solutions out there. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Elasticsearch Almost no one uses Solr anymore--most have migrated to Elasticsearch. I've never tried it myself but I heard Solr is much more difficult to configure and because it doesn't use a REST API, it locks you into Java and XML. XML--ick! Lucene: Elasticsearch is built using Lucene … Incentivized Helpful? Erlon Sousa Pinheiro Senior Devops Engineer in Information Technology at SOTI (Computer & Network Security, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Elasticsearch From my perspective, there is nothing currently on the marker better than Datadog, but unfortunately, that's a pricey product, Elasticsearch deliver us part of Datadog functionalities being cheaper. Fluentd as a service (provided by the company behind Fluentd) looks like a … Incentivized Helpful? Gary Davis Director in Information Technology at Webguild (Computer Software, 1-10 employees) Chose Elasticsearch Previously, we used Microsoft SQL Server's full-text search. Elasticsearch is faster and that includes searching and indexing and re-indexing the catalog of products. Incentivized Helpful? Gedson Silva Senior Production Engineer in Engineering at Carrilho Engineering (Telecommunications, 11-50 employees) Chose Elasticsearch Elasticsearch is much easier to set up and maintain. It provides better distributed architecture and fault tolerance, and is much faster searching. Incentivized Helpful? Jose Adan Ortiz Sales Engineer in Sales at Mainsoft S.A. (Information Technology and Services, 51-200 employees) Chose Elasticsearch With Elasticsearch you can integrate a lot of data sources. It can act as a small DataLake where you can put different kinds of data and extract important insights. With Splunk, additional to elevated costs of licensing and hardware, you need to have expert engineers to address … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Elasticsearch All database systems have things they are good at, and things they aren't as good at. Riak/SOLR is great as a K/V store, but SOLR cannot handle requests as fast as ElasticSearch. In fact, SOLR is the reason we had to migrate to ElasticSearch. Redis is great at SET operations … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Elasticsearch ES does not compete with the above packages but compliments them. By automating and mining logs, you are able to get a sense of the business process, marketing data or whatever else you need to capture and mine. The potential energy stored within Elasticsearch makes it a great … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Elasticsearch Elasticsearch is the most powerful and easy to use platform in this market. It's open source which makes enhancements very possible and also makes customization something that is commonplace. We're able to create custom modules to pull data from both log and config files, which … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Elasticsearch As far as we are concerned, Elasticsearch is the gold standard and we have barely evaluated any alternatives. You could consider it an alternative to a relational or NoSQL database, so in cases where those suffice, you don't need Elasticsearch. But if you want powerful … Incentivized Helpful? Anatoly Geyfman Founder & CEO in Information Technology at Carevoyance (Health, Wellness and Fitness, 1-10 employees) Chose Elasticsearch When we first evaluated Elasticsearch, we compared it with alternatives like traditional RDBMS products (Postgres, MySQL) as well as other noSQL solutions like Cassandra & MongoDB. For our use case, Elasticsearch delivered on two fronts. First, we got a world-class search … Incentivized Helpful? Tarun Mangukiya Co-Founder in Information Technology at Iconscout (Design, 1-10 employees) Chose Elasticsearch We've not tried any other products as Elasticsearch is the best fit for our requirements. Incentivized Helpful? Josh Kramer Senior Software Engineer in Research & Development at Octiv (Computer Software, 51-200 employees) Chose Elasticsearch Power and simplicity along with performance. Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic

User Ratings
	Elasticsearch
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (48 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	10.0 (1 ratings)
Usability	10.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	7.8 (9 ratings)
Implementation Rating	9.0 (1 ratings)