Entrinsik Informer vs. ibi WebFOCUS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Entrinsik Informer
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Entrinsik Informer is a web-based reporting and business intelligence application popular in the higher education vertical market. It helps organizations transform real-time data into actionable information by delivering ad-hoc reporting, data analysis, and interactive dashboards.N/A
ibi WebFOCUS
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
The ibi™ WebFOCUS® product is an enterprise business intelligence and analytics solution equipped with data management, visual discovery, predictive analytics, and visualizations. Combining these capabilities and data science in one unified containerized platform, the WebFOCUS® solution can be used to make data-driven decisions across the enterprise and provide reports, dashboards, and customer-facing applications at scale.N/A
Pricing
Entrinsik Informeribi WebFOCUS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Entrinsik Informeribi WebFOCUS
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Entrinsik Informeribi WebFOCUS
Considered Both Products
Entrinsik Informer
Chose Entrinsik Informer
Our organization used to use the built in reporting tool for Datatel, but it required more knowledge about SQL so only a handful of users could actually use it. There was no customization of the output or ability to schedule the queries. If you wanted something more complex …
Chose Entrinsik Informer
As an independent consultant, I've never been in a position to influence the actual selection of EI. I do, however, recommend it to all my clients primarily based on its price point and on its accessibility by a greater number of staff members.
Chose Entrinsik Informer
I really liked using the Query Builder that was once part of our Colleague system; however, it really relied on power users to provide the information to the campus. As Query Builder was phased out, our campus moved to Informer. The switch over was very successful. For most end …
Chose Entrinsik Informer
Very cheap solution with 90% same features as top software solutions
Chose Entrinsik Informer
Informer is much better than the old QueryBuilder tool that was a part of the Colleague interface. Schools using SQL Server for the back end may want to weigh the pros and cons between Informer and SSRS (Sql Server Reporting Services) since SSRS comes with no extra costs in …
Chose Entrinsik Informer
We needed to implement a new reporting tool due to Query Builder being eliminated. We went with Entrinsik Informer because it was already being used at some other Colleges that were also using Datatel/Ellucian Colleague, and the reviews from those Colleges were very positive. A …
Chose Entrinsik Informer
I have experience with Advizor AnalystX, and it was just awful. It is advertised as an interactive reporting tool, in which you can use your mouse to select and segment constituents by where they live (by clicking on a map), how much they've given to your institution, when they …
Chose Entrinsik Informer
As stated it works well for extractions, but lacks report design capability. One other thing it does well is query multiple database platforms at the same time. E.g. mysql and unidata.
Chose Entrinsik Informer
Entrinsik Informer was chosen because of it's real-time reporting capability from Unidata.
Chose Entrinsik Informer
My OIT office hasn't provided any other similar tool. Prior to Intrinsik, we typed script into the interface!

Any reports were custom programmed by the programmers in OIT.
Chose Entrinsik Informer
Easily Informer is one the most valuable reporting tools available in higher education.
Chose Entrinsik Informer
We use Informer with Ellucian Colleague instead of Ellucian's solutions which were substandard when we implemented Informer and remain unattractive for a variety of reasons with the standouts being cost and support. Informer is a fraction of the cost and the admin …
Chose Entrinsik Informer
Informer is not as advanced as Business Objects or Tableau, and we have had to use Tableau at times with reports that used a lot of aggregation, but the simplicity is often a strong suit of Informer, allowing users without programming experience the ability to create simple …
Chose Entrinsik Informer
The closet thing we had to Informer before was something called Query Builder. However, unless you were really good at coding and technology, it was like reading greek to the basic user of our system. Informer provides such an easy user experience that most people who were …
Chose Entrinsik Informer
Informer is more cost effective and easier to teach end users to write their own reports, but it still provides just as much functionality as the other products I've used. Informer is easy to manage and administer with a small number of IT employees per number of end users.
Chose Entrinsik Informer
We have not evaluated any other products. Previously we simply used Unidata to create report.
Chose Entrinsik Informer
Informer does more and Informer is easier to use.
Chose Entrinsik Informer
I feel Informer is more user friendly and more easily adaptable for our needs in higher education.
Chose Entrinsik Informer
Before purchasing Entrinsik Informer we used Query Builder or Excel via an odbc driver to access and report of off Unidata. Both of these other products only allowed us to report off of one table at a time. If you wanted data from multiple tables that had to be done with some …
Chose Entrinsik Informer
Crystal Reports with UniDATA ODBC. This works quite well but is cumbersome to set up and maintain. This required several steps outside the UniDATA database as well as setting up security views and a variety of processes that have to be monitored more closely. No other systems …
Chose Entrinsik Informer
We have implemented Blackboard for use by faculty with their students, for posting classroom materials and for interaction in many ways, but we have not used it for reporting purposes. We have allowed querying directly from Ellucian Colleague in the past, but that was not as …
Chose Entrinsik Informer
Query builder, and UniQuery
Chose Entrinsik Informer
Informer is a complete solution.
ibi WebFOCUS
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
Above average. Feature wise [Information Builders WebFOCUS] stands out. User friendliness is OK. It can handle the most complex tasks and its extensions with for example R make it extremely versatile. Support is lagging in western Europe, although i am more than happy with …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
We've looked at Tableau as an alternative and the visuals are good in Tableau. One way that WebFOCUS beats Tableau is it doesn't have any issues with a set number of columns in a report. When you need to have an Excel output, which happens, WebFOCUS is far superior. The …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
Webfocus handles the side of our business that is involved with our catalogs. Our catalogs is a huge revenue driver for us and this tool has been extremely useful with planning feature catalogs. Tableau is used more for marketing and merchandising purchases since we can filter …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
No comparison. Both have their strengths, but WebFocus comes out on top as the clear winner because it is so easy to use and understand for power users. Crystal Reports, like most BI tools, requires more extensive training and is not as easy or user friendly. It is more …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
WebFOCUS has a mature and tested product that speaks well to internal personnel who rely on legacy data systems for day-to-day operations and business processes. It is apparent some newer products provide flexibility in user access with limited previous knowledge or experience …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
I've used a few other development frameworks, but the desition of the company to use WF was not mine. I came and WF is the tool that the company uses.
I think that WF is a very important framework to achieve the goals of the company and I would like this technology to become the …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
WebFOCUS is more visual and easier to build for a non-programming user, where with little knowledge on data management and dedication to learn it, you can easily start creating very well presented reporting that is automated. With the Report Caster system it allows you to fully …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
Years ago I developed in Business Objects and when it came down to a decision to go with WebFOCUS it was a pretty easy choice. There is really nothing you can't do with the platform given all of the available options to develop the solutions with - HTML pages, parameterized …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
I like the ease of development best on webfocus. As compared to Qlikview, it is better at handling large amounts of data and the data access process is much easier in WebFOCUS ( very manual in Qlik). Qlik is better for ad hoc drill through and it is nice how a selector easily …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
Business Objects -WebFOCUS is more centered towards the user accessing data without an administrator setting up reporting objects or setting rules on data access. Access is more free form and allows the user more freedom (for better or worse) to design and create the report …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
I found WebFOCUS a great tool for reporting purposes as I have used it for a long time. They should compare themselves with new reporting tools like Tableau and Splunk. Tableau's interface is mind blowing. IBI should learn from Tableau and how they have penetrated the big data …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
The reason we chose WebFOCUS is because it seemed the easiest to use to create great reporting products. Also, we really liked that the code is transparent and readily available. We were confident in Information Builder's longevity and believed that ultimately, our staff would …
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
Haven't used any and not even think of using any. We are very much satisfied with WebFocus.
Chose ibi WebFOCUS
WebFOCUS was selected because of the rich data interface/adapter
Features
Entrinsik Informeribi WebFOCUS
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Entrinsik Informer
7.3
Ratings
11% below category average
ibi WebFOCUS
7.7
Ratings
6% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports5.50 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards9.10 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.50 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Entrinsik Informer
8.6
Ratings
7% above category average
ibi WebFOCUS
9.3
Ratings
14% above category average
Drill-down analysis9.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities8.20 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages8.20 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration9.10 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Entrinsik Informer
9.1
Ratings
9% above category average
ibi WebFOCUS
8.2
Ratings
1% below category average
Publish to Web9.10 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Publish to PDF9.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Report Versioning9.10 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling9.10 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Delivery to Remote Servers9.10 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Entrinsik Informer
7.3
Ratings
9% below category average
ibi WebFOCUS
6.3
Ratings
23% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.30 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.30 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Entrinsik Informer
9.1
Ratings
7% above category average
ibi WebFOCUS
9.0
Ratings
6% above category average
Multi-User Support (named login)9.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.10 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.10 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Entrinsik Informer
9.1
Ratings
15% above category average
ibi WebFOCUS
5.9
Ratings
28% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access9.10 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile9.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Mobile Application00 Ratings3.30 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Product A and Product B
Entrinsik Informer
8.2
Ratings
5% above category average
ibi WebFOCUS
8.6
Ratings
10% above category average
REST API8.20 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Javascript API00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
iFrames00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Themeable User Interface (UI)00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Customizable Platform (Open Source)00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Entrinsik Informeribi WebFOCUS
Small Businesses
BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 9.1 out of 10
BrightGauge
BrightGauge
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Score 9.9 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Kyvos Semantic Intelligence Layer
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Entrinsik Informeribi WebFOCUS
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.7
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.3
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
7.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Entrinsik Informeribi WebFOCUS
Likelihood to Recommend
Most schools that use Colleague (the Student Information System) have either UniData or SQL Server as the back-end database. If a school is currently a UniData school but has plans to move to SQL Server in the relatively near future then I'd advise against moving forward with Informer until after the conversion to SQL Server. There is a tool that will convert some reports, but there are many instances where the tool won't successfully convert the report and it will need to be re-written.
Read full review
WebFOCUS is a good comprehensive tool for BI for companies. I feel that scenarios where you want the user to interact and be able to ingest data in different formats would be a good use of the tool. Performing data discovery is easier with InfoAssist, especially the most recent versions, and allows users to customize their views and provide comments.
Read full review
Pros
  • Informer is pretty user-friendly. When teaching other employees how to use Informer, I typically don't have to repeat any steps or further explain how to do certain tasks because of how user-friendly it is.
  • Reports in Informer are kept in a list that can be filtered by user, specific tags, or even by how recent the report was made or run. This makes it very quick and easy to find and run a specific report.
  • Informer has many options for downloading the report output, including text (txt), comma separated values (csv), and even PDF.
Read full review
  • Webfocus reports all have the option to export to Excel. The excel spreadsheet is always very organized and clean, and the information is very easy to read.
  • Webfocus is able to maintain data from years prior. We can look up what we featured in catalogs and all the sales history attached with it.
  • Webfocus is able to provide support to a variety of departments. For example, our buying team uses it for planning in advance and our marketing team uses the tool to see how categories and products as the selling
Read full review
Cons
  • Informer needs more predefined date formats in its Column Display Editor. The existing 5 do not meet everyone's needs.
  • It's a minor UI issue, but Informer's Edit Columns view stutters and displays empty space when scrolling left or right. It may be because I'm using Safari on Mac OS X, and Informer isn't designed for input devices that scroll with "momentum" (as Apple calls it).
  • The Reports Listing takes longer to load reports than I believe it should. At least a progress bar displays to tell you when it's complete.
Read full review
  • The Developer Studio has some bugs. I've faced errors where swapping between our DEV and PROD servers causes that the software stops responding.
  • Easy to find documentation and examples. WebFOCUS has some help with this but it'd be better to provide more real life examples.
  • Sometimes it's harder to code the graphical interface of the report because of the HTML styling.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Informer has been handily meeting most of our reporting needs, and we've created a library of hundreds of reports that are used every day. They have a terrific support service to help when you have questions, and I've found them to be great at listening to what customers would like and adding new features. They are a small company that really listens and really cares, and I've been very pleased over the past few years getting to know them.
Read full review
This software is deeply engrained with my organization and has become a tool that would not easily be replaced without spending more money and resources to get the same results. License cost is comparable to other report writing tools and the capabilities are greater than the competition without having to buy multiple apps to do the same thing.
Read full review
Usability
Since I don't know code, there are sometimes calculations that are beyond my knowledge to create. It would also be great to be able to format multiple columns at once (center, for instance), rather than having to format them individually.
Read full review
Best BI tool/product I have used. The others don't compare overall. Some can look fancier, but when you actually use them with large data and data from numerous systems/sources that is where most of the competition falls away. I also don't like downtime. I have basically none for a large user base with WebFocus. Even SAP Crystal Reports went down for 4 days once - 4 days because the admin password got locked out due to a glitch and we had zero reports for 4 days. WebFocus has never had more than a few minutes of downtime. It's like a tank that just keeps rolling. There is no other choice for reliable BI.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
We have 10 concurrent licenses and we average between 6-8 at any given time during the day; and we host the application.
Read full review
Tracking availability formally for almost two years and we are at 99.8%
Read full review
Support Rating
Always able to get acceptable solutions in reasonable time from friendly support staff. Initial contact is always with knowledgeable person - not someone reading from a script trying to screen calls. Thanks Entrinsik for being in tune with my needs.
Read full review
They have extremely knowledgeable techs that I have worked with over the years. Some have actually become really good friends of mine. I see them often at local user groups and when we show them how we are using their tools to save millions of dollars throughout the company
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
It's hit and miss, the last class was overcrowded and people were having trouble connecting which took up much of the time. Instructors vary
Read full review
Implementation Rating
We bought the product on a Thursday morning, and we were writing reports on Friday afternoon. We did take about a month to manage the Mapping, Linking and Security to allow us to open it up across campus. We are now mapping from as many third-party vendors as we can to enable the creation of more ad-hoc reporting.
Read full review
Plan ahead on what data will be accessible and the type of security required on the database and if you will want to use security that is built into the software. It is worth consulting with the vendor on what your plan is and how they recommend you proceed in order to get results you are happy with.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Our organization used to use the built in reporting tool for Datatel, but it required more knowledge about SQL so only a handful of users could actually use it. There was no customization of the output or ability to schedule the queries. If you wanted something more complex than what was available, then the programmers needed to write an extraction program to pull the data you needed
Read full review
Above average. Feature wise [Information Builders WebFOCUS] stands out. User friendliness is OK. It can handle the most complex tasks and its extensions with for example R make it extremely versatile. Support is lagging in western Europe, although i am more than happy with current level. With takeover by tipco it remains to be seen how European strategy will evolve
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We have definitely improved customer service due to better reporting using Informer. All departments are better empowered to help our students in a more timely and accurate manner.
  • Using Informer has given us the ability to eliminate functionality within our ERP system and offload reporting to a data store instead of the transactional system. This has resulted in successfully upgrading our core systems and improved response times.
Read full review
  • We are not yet a success story. Though we've been implementing WebFOCUS for over a year, we have very few products in our Production portal. Of course, this is not all the responsibility of Information Builders, but we were ill-advised by our 'training coordinator' in our training of staff and coming up to speed with the tools has been very slow.
  • Once skilled analysts and professional IT staff achieve a grasp of the products, they are able to very quickly create polished and well-received products.
  • The DW/BI project has helped us to establish standards and protocols of communication that will allow us to more quickly meet knowledge transfer requirements
Read full review
ScreenShots

Entrinsik Informer Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of