Epic vs. TriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Epic
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
Epic offers a suite of medical practice management and EHR software.N/A
TriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
The TriZetto Core Administration platform aims to provide the flexibility, automation and configurability needed to boost payer efficiency and launch new business models. Cognizant’s line of TriZetto Healthcare Products provides enterprise-wide core administration solutions. Editions include Facets®, QNXT™ and QicLink™. These aim to enable organizations to conduct core administrative tasks with the ability to anticipate tomorrow’s healthcare industry with additional functionality and product…N/A
Pricing
EpicTriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
EpicTriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
EpicTriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)
Features
EpicTriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)
Billing and Claims Management
Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of Product A and Product B
Epic
9.0
Ratings
18% above category average
TriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)
-
Ratings
Real-time eligibility verification9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Claims management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Coding9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Patient billing9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial Reporting9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Patient Scheduling
Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Epic
9.7
Ratings
20% above category average
TriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)
-
Ratings
Rule-based scheduling10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated appointment reminders10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated patient check-in10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-location support10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Calendar interface8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Product A and Product B
Epic
9.9
Ratings
31% above category average
TriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)
-
Ratings
Charting / document management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Templates10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Patient portal10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile/tablet support10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Fax integration10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow automation10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Speech recognition10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customization9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
E-prescribing10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Product A and Product B
Epic
10.0
Ratings
18% above category average
TriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)
-
Ratings
HIPAA compliance10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-based permission levels10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of Product A and Product B
Epic
9.3
Ratings
20% above category average
TriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)
-
Ratings
Task tracking9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Specialty-specific workflows9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
User Ratings
EpicTriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
EpicTriZetto Core Administration (Facets, QNXT and QicLink)
Likelihood to Recommend
Epic is very good on the medical side and continues improving mental health and dental care. Having integrated telehealth via Zoom was a game-changer. During COVID, it was vital to have telehealth options and to ensure it was completely HIPAA Compliant and easy to document inside their health record.
Read full review
It's all about the knowledge base and talents of the end user. Trizetto performs well with most users, it performs extremely well in the hands of top talent.
Read full review
Pros
  • Updated technology. Epic consistently stays up to date and advances their technology and features.
  • Shortcuts, templates, and smart phrases help to make using the software easier and faster with accuracy.
  • Intuitive user interface. Epic has put a lot of thought into the design and function of the software and has ensured that it is user friendly.
Read full review
  • Reduced claims errors and quick reprocessing
  • Easily monitor a 6-7 figure AR
  • View productivity across multiple departments
Read full review
Cons
  • Difficult to find what you need.
  • Almost impossible to correct mistakes.
  • Multiple screens must be navigated to get to what you want.
Read full review
  • Customer service is exceptional, no issues here
  • Web portal is easy to use, again very satisfied
  • I would like to see more opportunites for training videos/ best use training
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
It is beyond measure the best EHR on the market.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
My organization has been using the Epic platform for 10 years and counting! Epic has continuously improved and updated the system to align with current best practices and meet the needs of members and their patients. As an FQHC, we provide medical, dental, and mental health services, and it is essential to have access to all the patients' health information in one place. Integrating Care Everywhere and Telehealth options embedded directly in the EHR has greatly improved our ability to take the best care of each patient who walks through our doors.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
A dedicated support staff for each module/area is provided by Epic. This is beneficial for points of contact, however, not all support staff are created equal, and there seems to be high turnover in these roles(staff seems to turn over every 1-2 years). This can make it challenging for continuity and quick support resolution as new staff are not as familiar with organization-specific needs, environments, and/or questions.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
Well-vetted lesson plans that teach you what you need to know for success.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
While not as effective as in-person training, it is still adequate.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Epic has a regimented implementation process that ensures a successful go-live.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Epic has more features and seems to be used by most hospital systems, which means information can be shared between systems. It is not compatible with Cerner, McKesson, or any other of the less commonly used products and we cannot view information from such facilities. I believe Epic has the most features. It automatically saves entries, unlike Quadrimed, for example, which does not save and if you accidentally get logged out you lose your information.
Read full review
There are a number of other offers, but you will find the robust nature of facets and ease of use - an easy decision to make.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Improved Customer Satisfaction: After the initial implementation phase, I have seen increases in patient satisfaction. This is due to the increased transparency regarding their care as well as an increase in paid claims.
  • Increased Revenue: In some cases I have seen Medicare denial rates drop from high 80's and 90's down to single digits. I have seen incredible jumps in the time payment is received from an approved claim.
Read full review
  • Combined with Clear Healthcare Estimates HCT, we have a collections of patient responsibility that exceed 96%. Industry average is less than 55%.
  • Our ROI increased modestly with this service, although our team performs quite well with previous product
Read full review
ScreenShots